Skip to main content

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Erasmus MC heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van Erasmus MC, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van Erasmus MC.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Top
Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2011

Laparoscopische pyelumplastiek bij kinderen vanaf 3 jaar: onze nieuwe standaardbehandeling

Auteurs: drs. F. van der Toorn, Dr. J. R Scheepe, drs. K. P. Wolffenbuttel, drs. J. van den Hoek

Gepubliceerd in: Tijdschrift voor Urologie | Uitgave 4/2011

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Samenvatting

Introductie: Om de laparoscopische pyelumplastiek (LP) in onze kliniek te accepteren als nieuwe behandeling voor UPJ-stenose bij kinderen, moeten de resultaten ervan minstens gelijkwaardig zijn aan die van de conventionele open pyelumplastiek (OP), met een duidelijk korte opname. Het doel van deze studie is het vergelijken van onze resultaten van de LP bij kinderen vanaf 3 jaar met die van de OP en de resultaten van de LP zoals beschreven in de literatuur.
Materiaal en methoden: In de periode van april 2006 t/m september 2010 werden in totaal 51 keer een LP transperitoneaal verricht bij kinderen vanaf de leeftijd van 3 jaar. De historische controlegroep bestond uit de patiënten vanaf de leeftijd van 3 jaar die van 1998 t/m 2005 een OP (n = 80) ondergingen. Een succesvolle pyelumplastiek is gedefinieerd als: symptoomvrij, geen conversie of re-operatie/-interventie, een echografisch verbeterde dilatatie en/of een renografisch verbeterde afvloed.
Resultaten: De gemiddelde operatieduur in de LP-groep was significant langer dan in de OP-groep (176 vs 113 minuten; p< 0,001). In de LP-groep was geen conversie. De gemiddelde opname in de LP-groep duurde significant korter dan in de OP-groep (1,2 vs 6,7 dagen; p< 0,001). In de LP-groep bleek de renografische afvloed vaker verbeterd dan in de OPgroep (98% vs 86%; p= 0,019). Een succesvol resultaat werd gezien bij 50 patiënten in de LP-groep en bij 77 patiënten in de OP-groep (98% vs 96%; p= 0,55). Onze LP toonde duidelijk een korte opname en een zeer hoge succeskans in vergelijking met de in de literatuur beschreven resultaten.
Conclusie: In vergelijking met de OP heeft de LP een langere operatieduur, vaker een verbeterde renografische afvloed, en is de behandeling minstens even succesvol. Daarnaast gaat onze LP gepaard met een duidelijk korte opname en zeer gunstige uitkomsten in vergelijking met de literatuur. Gezien deze gunstige resultaten beschouwen wij de LP als onze standaardbehandeling van UPJ-stenose bij kinderen vanaf 3 jaar.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Carr MC, El-Ghoneimi A. Anomalies and surgery of the ureteropelvic junction. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, et al. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007. Carr MC, El-Ghoneimi A. Anomalies and surgery of the ureteropelvic junction. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, et al. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007.
2.
go back to reference Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter: a case diagnosed preoperatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol. 1949;21:209–14.PubMedCrossRef Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter: a case diagnosed preoperatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol. 1949;21:209–14.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bonnard A, Fouquet V, Carricaburu E, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005;173(5):1710–3.PubMedCrossRef Bonnard A, Fouquet V, Carricaburu E, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005;173(5):1710–3.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Yee DS, Shanberg AM, Duel BP, et al. Initial comparison of roboticassisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Urology. 2006;67:599–602.PubMedCrossRef Yee DS, Shanberg AM, Duel BP, et al. Initial comparison of roboticassisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Urology. 2006;67:599–602.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lee RS, Retik AB, Borer JG, et al. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J Urol. 2006;175:683–7.PubMedCrossRef Lee RS, Retik AB, Borer JG, et al. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J Urol. 2006;175:683–7.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chacko JK, Koyle MA, Mingin GC, et al. The minimally invasive open pyeloplasty. J Ped Urol. 2006;2:368–72.CrossRef Chacko JK, Koyle MA, Mingin GC, et al. The minimally invasive open pyeloplasty. J Ped Urol. 2006;2:368–72.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Piedrahita YK, Palmer JS. In one-day hospitalization after open pyeloplasty possible and safe? Urology. 2006;67:181–4.PubMedCrossRef Piedrahita YK, Palmer JS. In one-day hospitalization after open pyeloplasty possible and safe? Urology. 2006;67:181–4.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ravish IR, Nerli RB, Reddy MN, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared with open pyeloplasty in children. J Endourol. 2007;21:897–902.PubMedCrossRef Ravish IR, Nerli RB, Reddy MN, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared with open pyeloplasty in children. J Endourol. 2007;21:897–902.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Piaggio LA, Franc-Guimond J, Noh PH, et al. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children: comparison with open surgery. J Urol. 2007;178:1579–83.PubMedCrossRef Piaggio LA, Franc-Guimond J, Noh PH, et al. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children: comparison with open surgery. J Urol. 2007;178:1579–83.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Braga LHP, Lorenzo AJ, Farhat WA, et al. Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties. J Urol. 2008;180:1693–9.PubMedCrossRef Braga LHP, Lorenzo AJ, Farhat WA, et al. Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties. J Urol. 2008;180:1693–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Valla JS, Breaud J, Griffin SJ, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic vs open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. J Ped Urol. 2009;5:368–73.CrossRef Valla JS, Breaud J, Griffin SJ, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic vs open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. J Ped Urol. 2009;5:368–73.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ninan GK, Sinha C, Patel Ramnik, et al. Dismembered pyeloplasty using double J stent in infants and children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;2:191–4.CrossRef Ninan GK, Sinha C, Patel Ramnik, et al. Dismembered pyeloplasty using double J stent in infants and children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;2:191–4.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Penn HA, Gatti JM, Hoestje SM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: preliminary report of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol. 2010; 184: 690–5.PubMedCrossRef Penn HA, Gatti JM, Hoestje SM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: preliminary report of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol. 2010; 184: 690–5.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Peters CA, Schlussel RN, Retik AB. Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1995;153:1962–5.PubMedCrossRef Peters CA, Schlussel RN, Retik AB. Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1995;153:1962–5.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yeung CK, Tam YH, Sihoe YDY, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in infants and children. BJU Int. 2001;87;509–13.PubMedCrossRef Yeung CK, Tam YH, Sihoe YDY, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in infants and children. BJU Int. 2001;87;509–13.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference El-Ghoneimi A, Farhat W, Bolduc S, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty by a retroperitoneal approach in children. BJU Int. 2003;92:104–8.PubMedCrossRef El-Ghoneimi A, Farhat W, Bolduc S, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty by a retroperitoneal approach in children. BJU Int. 2003;92:104–8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Canon SJ, Jayanthi VR, Lowe GJ. Which is better – Retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2007;178:1791–5.PubMedCrossRef Canon SJ, Jayanthi VR, Lowe GJ. Which is better – Retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2007;178:1791–5.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shoma AM, El Nahas AR, Bazeed MA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a prospective randomized comparison between the transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneoscopy. J Urol. 2007;178:2020–4.PubMedCrossRef Shoma AM, El Nahas AR, Bazeed MA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a prospective randomized comparison between the transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneoscopy. J Urol. 2007;178:2020–4.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Atug F, Woods M, Burgess SV. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005;174;1440–2.PubMedCrossRef Atug F, Woods M, Burgess SV. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005;174;1440–2.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kutikov A, Nguyen M, Guzzo, et al. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant – lessons learned. J Urol. 2006;176:2237–9.PubMedCrossRef Kutikov A, Nguyen M, Guzzo, et al. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant – lessons learned. J Urol. 2006;176:2237–9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Olsen LH, Rawashdeh YF, Jorgensen TM. Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year experience. J Urol. 2007;178:2137–41.PubMedCrossRef Olsen LH, Rawashdeh YF, Jorgensen TM. Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year experience. J Urol. 2007;178:2137–41.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Franco I, Dyer LL, Zelkovic P. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient: hand sewn anastomosis versus robotic assisted anastomosis – is there a difference? J Urol. 2007;178:1483–6.PubMedCrossRef Franco I, Dyer LL, Zelkovic P. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient: hand sewn anastomosis versus robotic assisted anastomosis – is there a difference? J Urol. 2007;178:1483–6.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Najmaldin A, Antao B. Early experience of tele-robotic surgery in children. Int J Med Robot. 2007 Sep;3(3):199–202. Najmaldin A, Antao B. Early experience of tele-robotic surgery in children. Int J Med Robot. 2007 Sep;3(3):199–202.
24.
go back to reference Tan HL. Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 1999;162:1045–7.PubMedCrossRef Tan HL. Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 1999;162:1045–7.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Casale P, Grady RW, Joyner BD, et al. Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient. J Endourol. 2004;18:875–8.PubMedCrossRef Casale P, Grady RW, Joyner BD, et al. Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient. J Endourol. 2004;18:875–8.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Reddy M, Nerli RB, Bashetty R, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005;74:700–2.CrossRef Reddy M, Nerli RB, Bashetty R, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005;74:700–2.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Metzelder ML, Schier F, Petersen C, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal pyeloplasty in children is feasible irrespective of age. J Urol. 2006;175:688–91.PubMedCrossRef Metzelder ML, Schier F, Petersen C, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal pyeloplasty in children is feasible irrespective of age. J Urol. 2006;175:688–91.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kutikov, Resnick M, Casale P. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the infant younger than 6 months – is it technically possible. J Urol. 2006;175:1477–9.PubMedCrossRef Kutikov, Resnick M, Casale P. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the infant younger than 6 months – is it technically possible. J Urol. 2006;175:1477–9.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Singh H, Ganpule A, Malhotra V, et al. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Endourol. 2007;21:1461–6.PubMedCrossRef Singh H, Ganpule A, Malhotra V, et al. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Endourol. 2007;21:1461–6.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Cascio S, Tien A, Chee, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years. J Urol. 2007;177:335–8.PubMedCrossRef Cascio S, Tien A, Chee, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years. J Urol. 2007;177:335–8.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Lam PN, Wong C, Mulholland TL, et al. Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: 4-year experience. J Endourol. 2007;21:1467–71.PubMedCrossRef Lam PN, Wong C, Mulholland TL, et al. Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: 4-year experience. J Endourol. 2007;21:1467–71.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Porpiglia F, Billia M, Volpe A, et al. Transperitoneal left laparoscopic pyeloplasty with transmesocolic access to the pelvi-ureteric junction: technique description and results with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. BJU Int. 2008 Apr;101(8):1024–8. Porpiglia F, Billia M, Volpe A, et al. Transperitoneal left laparoscopic pyeloplasty with transmesocolic access to the pelvi-ureteric junction: technique description and results with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. BJU Int. 2008 Apr;101(8):1024–8.
33.
go back to reference Braga LH, Pippi-Salle J, Lorenzo AJ, et al. Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a referral center: lesson learned. J Endourol. 2007;21:738–42.PubMedCrossRef Braga LH, Pippi-Salle J, Lorenzo AJ, et al. Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a referral center: lesson learned. J Endourol. 2007;21:738–42.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Yucel S, Samuelson ML, Nguyen MT, et al. Usefulness of shortterm retrievable ureteral stent in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2007;177:720–5.PubMedCrossRef Yucel S, Samuelson ML, Nguyen MT, et al. Usefulness of shortterm retrievable ureteral stent in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2007;177:720–5.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Vicentini FC, Denes FT, Borges LL, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: is the outcome different in children under 2 years of age? J Ped Urol. 2008;4:348–51.CrossRef Vicentini FC, Denes FT, Borges LL, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: is the outcome different in children under 2 years of age? J Ped Urol. 2008;4:348–51.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Chacko JK, Piaggio, Neheman A, et al. Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: lessons learned from the first 52 cases. J Endourol 2009; 23:1307–11.PubMed Chacko JK, Piaggio, Neheman A, et al. Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: lessons learned from the first 52 cases. J Endourol 2009; 23:1307–11.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Hadley DA, Wicher C, Wallis MC. Retrograde percutaneous access for kidney internal splint stent catheter placement in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: avoiding stent removal in the operating room. J Endourol. 2009;23:1991–4.PubMedCrossRef Hadley DA, Wicher C, Wallis MC. Retrograde percutaneous access for kidney internal splint stent catheter placement in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: avoiding stent removal in the operating room. J Endourol. 2009;23:1991–4.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Lopez M, Guye E, Becmeur F, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for repair of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Apr;19 Suppl 1:S91–3. Lopez M, Guye E, Becmeur F, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for repair of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Apr;19 Suppl 1:S91–3.
39.
go back to reference Nerli RB, Reddy M, Prabha V, et al. Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009 Apr;25(4):343–7. Nerli RB, Reddy M, Prabha V, et al. Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009 Apr;25(4):343–7.
40.
go back to reference Kojima Y, Sasaki S, Mizuno K, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Int J Urol. 2009;16:472–6.PubMedCrossRef Kojima Y, Sasaki S, Mizuno K, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Int J Urol. 2009;16:472–6.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Szavay PO, Luithle T, Seitz G, et al. Functional outcome after laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2010 Aug;6(4):359–63. Szavay PO, Luithle T, Seitz G, et al. Functional outcome after laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2010 Aug;6(4):359–63.
42.
go back to reference Sedlacek J, Kocvara R, Molcan J, et al. Transmesocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a standard approach for the left side repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2010;6:171–7.CrossRef Sedlacek J, Kocvara R, Molcan J, et al. Transmesocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a standard approach for the left side repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2010;6:171–7.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Braga LHP, Lorenzo AJ, Bagli DJ, et al. Comparison of flank, dorsal lumbotomy and laparoscopic approaches for dismembered pyeloplasty in children older than 3 years with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2010;183:306–11.PubMedCrossRef Braga LHP, Lorenzo AJ, Bagli DJ, et al. Comparison of flank, dorsal lumbotomy and laparoscopic approaches for dismembered pyeloplasty in children older than 3 years with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2010;183:306–11.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Tanaka ST, Grantham JA, Thomas JC, et al. A comparison of open vs laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty using the pediatric health information system database-do benefits of laparoscopic approach recede at younger ages? J Urol. 2008;180:1479–85.PubMedCrossRef Tanaka ST, Grantham JA, Thomas JC, et al. A comparison of open vs laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty using the pediatric health information system database-do benefits of laparoscopic approach recede at younger ages? J Urol. 2008;180:1479–85.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR. Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic chlecystectomy (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. Apr 15;(2):CD006930. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR. Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic chlecystectomy (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. Apr 15;(2):CD006930.
46.
go back to reference Ramsden A, Rainsburry P, Sells H. Defining success in laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Br J Med Surg Urol. 2011;4(3):108–12.CrossRef Ramsden A, Rainsburry P, Sells H. Defining success in laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Br J Med Surg Urol. 2011;4(3):108–12.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Gundeti MS, Reynolds WS, Duffy PG, et al. Further experience with the vascular hitch (laparoscopic transposition of lower pole crossing vessels): an alternate treatment for pediatric ureterovascular ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2008;180:1832–6.PubMedCrossRef Gundeti MS, Reynolds WS, Duffy PG, et al. Further experience with the vascular hitch (laparoscopic transposition of lower pole crossing vessels): an alternate treatment for pediatric ureterovascular ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2008;180:1832–6.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Almodhen F, Jednak R, Capolicchio JP, et al. Is routine renography required after pyeloplasty? J Urol. 2010;184:1128–33.PubMedCrossRef Almodhen F, Jednak R, Capolicchio JP, et al. Is routine renography required after pyeloplasty? J Urol. 2010;184:1128–33.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Laparoscopische pyelumplastiek bij kinderen vanaf 3 jaar: onze nieuwe standaardbehandeling
Auteurs
drs. F. van der Toorn
Dr. J. R Scheepe
drs. K. P. Wolffenbuttel
drs. J. van den Hoek
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2011
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in
Tijdschrift voor Urologie / Uitgave 4/2011
Print ISSN: 2211-3037
Elektronisch ISSN: 2211-4718
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13629-011-0048-z