Top

Gepubliceerd in:

23-10-2024

Zijn we klaar om te luisteren naar de stem van degenen om wie het gaat? Wat we geleerd hebben van het luisteren naar- en betrekken van kinderen bij psychologisch onderzoek met kinderen en gezinnen

Auteurs: Anna Sarkadi, Maria Thell, Karin Fängström, Anton Dahlberg, Anna Fäldt, Anna Pérez-Aronsson, Georgina Warner, Maria Eriksson

Gepubliceerd in: Gezinstherapie Wereldwijd | Uitgave 4/2024

Samenvatting

Een veranderende kijk op kinderen, versneld door the Convention of the Rights of the Child (UN in Convention on the rights of the child, UN Doc. A/RES/44/25, 1989, http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/pdf/crc.pdf), heeft de afgelopen decennia voor een verschuiving gezorgd in het landschap van kinder- en gezinsstudies. Voorheen werden kinderen meestal als weinig geloofwaardig beschouwd en vielen zij daarom buiten het interpretatieve kader van volwassen onderzoekers, maar steeds meer wordt erkend dat het kind-met-rechten niet alleen de capaciteit heeft, maar ook het recht om aan onderzoek deel te nemen. Het was al gebruikelijk dat niet structureel kwetsbare kinderen participeerden in onderzoek, maar de laatste tijd worden kinderen ook betrokken bij de studie-opzet, review, uitvoering en disseminatie. Toch zijn er nog praktische en ethische bezwaren. Kinderen mogen dan wel het recht hebben om deel te nemen aan een studie, maar zij hebben ook het recht op bescherming. In dit commentaar willen we: (i) epistemische, kinderrechtelijke en kindersociologische argumenten geven voor onderzoek over, met en door kinderen en jongeren; (ii) onze eigen ervaringen delen over onderzoek met kinderen en jongeren, om te laten zien welke unieke kennis en inzichten hierdoor verkregen kunnen worden; en (iii) meegeven wat we geleerd hebben over hoe kinderen en jongeren bij onderzoek betrokken kunnen worden, ook structureel kwetsbare kinderen.

vorige artikel Cultureel pragmatisme: op zoek naar een andere manier van denken over culturele competentie in de geestelijke gezondheidszorg

volgende artikel Het bepalen van schermgebruik bij kinderen onder de vijf: aanbevelingen voor de ontwikkeling van opvoedingsinterventies

Åkerström, J. (2014). “Participation is everything”: Young people’s voices on participation in school life. Örebro University.

Baumtrog, M. D., & Peach, H. (2019). They can’t be believed: Children, intersectionality, and epistemic injustice. Journal of Global Ethics, 15(3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2019.1695280.CrossRef

Blackstone, S. W., Williams, M. B., & Wilkins, D. P. (2007). Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC. Augmentative Alternative Communication, 23(3), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701553684.CrossRefPubMed

Bokstrom, P., Fangstrom, K., Calam, R., Lucas, S., & Sarkadi, A. (2016). ‘I felt a little bubbly in my tummy’: Eliciting pre-schoolers’ accounts of their health visit using a computer-assisted interview method. Child: Care, Health and Development, 42(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12293.CrossRefPubMed

Burroughs, M. D., & Tollefsen, D. (2016). Learning to listen: Epistemic injustice and the child. Episteme, 13(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2015.64.CrossRef

Cahill, H., & Dadvand, B. (2018). Re-conceptualising youth participation: A framework to inform action. Children & Youth Services Review, 95, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.001.CrossRef

Carel, H., & Györffy, G. (2014). Seen but not heard: Children and epistemic injustice. The Lancet, 384(9950), 1256–1257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140–6736(14)61759‑1.CrossRef

Cody, C. (2017). ‘We have personal experience to share, it makes it real’: Young people’s views on their role in sexual violence pre-vention efforts. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.015.CrossRef

Dahlberg, A., Salari, R., Fängström, K., Fabian, H., & Sarkadi, A. (2022). Successful implementation of parenting support at pre-school: An evaluation of Triple P in Sweden. PLoS ONE, 17(4), e265589. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265589.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Dindar, K., Lindblom, A., & Kärnä, E. (2017). The construction of communicative (in)competence in autism: A focus on methodological decisions. Disability Society, 32(6), 868–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1329709.CrossRef

Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Phelps, F. G. (2005). Gaze aversion: A response to cognitive or social difficulty? Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 727–733. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195338.CrossRef

ERIC (2016). International charter for ethical research involving children. ERIC Charter. https://childethics.com/charter/

Eriksson, M., & Näsman, E. (2008). Participation in family law proceedings for children whose father is violent to their mother. Childhood, 15(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568207088426.CrossRef

Eriksson, M., & Näsman, E. (2012). Interviews with children exposed to violence. Children & Society, 26(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2010.00322.x.CrossRef

Eriksson, M., Broberg, A. G., Hultmann, O., Chawinga, E., & Axberg, U. (2022). Safeguarding children subjected to violence in the family: Child-centered risk assessments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 13779. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113779.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Facca, D., Gladstone, B., & Teachman, G. (2020). Working the limits of “giving voice” to children: A critical conceptual review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920933391.CrossRef

Fäldt, A., Klint, F., Warner, G., & Sarkadi, A. (2022). Experiences of children with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden: A qualitative interview study. BMJ Paediatrics Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001398.CrossRefPubMed

Fängström, K., & Eriksson, M. (2020). The feasibility of the In My Shoes computer assisted interview for eliciting evaluative content in interviews with young children. Children and Youth Services Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105522.CrossRef

Fängström, K., Bokstrom, P., Dahlberg, A., Calam, R., Lucas, S., & Sarkadi, A. (2016). In My shoes—Validation of a computer assisted approach for interviewing children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 58, 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.06.022.CrossRefPubMed

Fängström, K., Salari, R., Eriksson, M., & Sarkadi, A. (2017a). The computer-assisted interview In My Shoes can benefit shy pre- school children’s communication. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182978.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fängström, K., Sarkadi, A., Lucas, S., Calam, R., & Eriksson, M. (2017b). “And they gave me a shot, it really hurt”—Evaluative content in investigative interviews with young children. Children and Youth Services Review, 82, 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.10.017.CrossRef

Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Gräfe, A. W., & Englander, M. (2022). Listening to the social world of the child: A phenomenological proposal. Barn-forskning Om Barn Og Barndom i Norden. https://doi.org/10.23865/barn.v40.5072.CrossRef

Grove, N., Bunning, K., Porter, J., & Olsson, C. (1999). See what I mean: Interpreting the meaning of communication by people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.1999.tb00076.x.CrossRef

Hamond, N. R., & Fivush, R. (1991). Memories of mickey mouse—Young-children recount their trip to Disneyworld. Cognitive Development, 6(4), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(91)90048-I.CrossRef

Hart, R. A. (1992). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citi zenship. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/childrens_participation.pdf

Hart, R. A. (2008). Stepping back from “the ladder”: Reflections on a model of participatory work with children. In B. J. A. Reid, J. Nikel & V. Simovska (red.), Participation and learning (pag. 19–31). Springer.CrossRef

Heimer, M., Näsman, E., & Palme, J. (2018). Vulnerable children’s rights to participation, protection, and provision: The process of defining the problem in Swedish child and family welfare. Child & Family Social Work, 23(2), 316–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12424.CrossRef

Horgan, D., & Martin, S. (2021). Children’s research advisory groups: Moving from adult-research agendas to co-creation with children. In Child and youth participation in policy, practice and research (pag. 168–181). Routledge.CrossRef

Houghton, C. (2015). Young people’s perspectives on participatory ethics: Agency, power and impact in domestic abuse research and policy-making. Child Abuse Review, 24(4), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2407.CrossRef

Houghton, C. (2018). Voice, agency, power: A framework for young survivors’ participation in national domestic abuse policy-making. In S. Holt, C. Øverlien & J. Devaney (red.), Responding to domestic violence: Emerging challenges for policy, practice and research in Europe (band 1, pag. 77–96). Jessica Kingsley.

Iversen, C. (2012). Recordability: Resistance and collusion in psychometric interviews with children. Discourse Studies, 14(6), 691–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612456997.CrossRef

Iversen, C. (2019). Beyond accessing information: Claiming to understand in child social welfare interviews. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(3), 550–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12289.CrossRefPubMed

James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. In C. Jenks (red.), Childhood: Critical concepts in sociology (pag. 195–218). Polity Press.

Kaminski, J. W., Valle, L. A., Filene, J. H., & Boyle, C. L. (2008). A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(4), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9201-9.CrossRefPubMed

Kaplan, K. (2017). Facilitating an effective design studio workshop. Nielsen Norman Group.

Kay, E., & Tisdall, M. (2012). The challenge and challenging of childhood studies? Learning from disability studies and research with disabled children. Children & Society, 26(3), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2012.00431.x.CrossRef

Kellett, M. (2005). How to develop children as researchers. SAGE.

Kellett, M. (2010). Rethinking children and research: Attitudes in contemporary society. Bloomsbury Publishing.CrossRef

Kellett, M., Forrest, R., Dent, N., & Ward, S. (2004). ‘Just teach us the skills please, we’ll do the rest’: Empowering ten-year-olds as active researchers. Children & Society, 18(5), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.807.CrossRef

Kennan, D., Brady, B., & Forkan, C. (2019). Space, voice, audience and influence: The Lundy model of participation (2007) in child welfare practice. Practice, 31(3), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2018.1483494.CrossRef

Larsson, I., Staland-Nyman, C., Svedberg, P., Nygren, J. M., & Carlsson, I.-M. (2018). Children and young people’s participation in developing interventions in health and well-being: A scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3219-2.CrossRef

Liabo, K., Ingold, A., & Roberts, H. (2018). Co-production with “vulnerable” groups: Balancing protection and participation. Health Science Reports, 1(3), e19. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.19.CrossRefPubMed

Lundy, L. (2007). ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising article 12 of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033.CrossRef

Lundy, L., & McEvoy, L. (2017). Children’s rights and research processes: Assisting children to (in)formed view. In U. Kilkelly & L. Lundy (red.), Children’s rights (pag. 525–540). Routledge.

Lygnegård, F., Thell, M., & Sarkadi, A. (2023). Adolescent co-researchers identified the central role of social media for young people during the pandemic. Acta Paediatrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.16670.CrossRefPubMed

McMellon, C., & Tisdall, E. K. M. (2020). Children and young people’s participation rights: Looking backwards and moving forwards. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 28(1), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02801002.CrossRef

Motta, R. W. (2008). Secondary trauma. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 10, 291–298.PubMed

Mullender, A., Hague, G., Imam, U., Kelly, L., Malos, E., & Regan, L. (2002). Children’s perspectives on domestic violence. SAGE.CrossRef

National Children’s Advocacy Center (2019). National Children’s Advocacy Center’s child forensic interview structure. National Children’s Advocacy Center.

Pérez-Aronsson, A., Thell, M., Lampa, E., Löfving, S. G., Tökés, A., Torakai, N., Ibrahim, K., Aljeshy, R., & Warner, G. (2022). Adaptation of the trauma group intervention ‘Teaching Recovery Techniques’ for online delivery: A participatory design and usability study. Internet Interventions, 30, 100589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2022.100589.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Preston, J., Stones, S. R., Davies, H., Preston, J., & Phillips, B. (2019). How to involve children and young people in what is, after all, their research. Archive of Disease in Childhood, 104(5), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-315118.CrossRef

Prout, A., & James, A. (2015). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems. In A. James & A. Prout (red.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood (pag. 6–28). Routledge.CrossRef

Rahmqvist, J., Wells, M., & Sarkadi, A. (2013). Conscious parenting: A qualitative study on Swedish parents’ motives to participate in Triple P, the Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 934–944.CrossRef

Robinson, L., Adair, P., Coffey, M., Harris, R., & Burnside, G. (2016). Identifying the participant characteristics that predict recruitment and retention of participants to randomised controlled tri- als involving children: A systematic review. Trials, 17(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1415-0.CrossRef

Salari, R., Wells, M. B., & Sarkadi, A. (2014). Child behaviour problems, parenting behaviours and parental adjustment in mothers and fathers in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 42(7), 547–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494814541595.CrossRefPubMed

Sammons, H. M., Wright, K., Young, B., & Farsides, B. (2016). Research with children and young people: Not on them. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 101(12), 1086–1089.CrossRefPubMed

Sampaio, F., Sarkadi, A., Salari, R., Zethraeus, N., & Feldman, I. (2015). Cost and effects of a universal parenting programme delivered to parents of preschoolers. European Journal of Public Health, 25(6), 1035–1042. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv106.CrossRefPubMed

Sandland, R. (2017). A clash of conventions?: Participation, power and the rights of disabled children. Social Inclusion, 5(3), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v5i3.955.CrossRef

Sarkadi, A., Dahlberg, A., Fängstrom, K., & Warner, G. (2020a). Children want parents to ask for permission before ‘sharenting’. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 56(6), 981–983. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14945.CrossRefPubMed

Sarkadi, A., Warner, G., Salari, R., Fängström, K., Durbeej, N., Lampa, E., Baghdasaryan, Z., Osman, F., Gupta Löfving, S., Perez Aronsson, A., Feldman, I., Ssegonja, R., Calam, R., Bjärtå, A., Leiler, A., Rondung, E., Wasteson, E., Oppedal, B., & Keeshin, B. (2020b). Evaluation of the teaching recovery techniques community-based intervention for unaccompanied refugee youth experiencing post-traumatic stress symptoms (Swedish Unaccom- Panied yOuth Refugee Trial; SUPpORT): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 21(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3814-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sarkadi, A., Sahlin Torp, L., Perez-Aronsson, A., & Warner, G. (2021). Children’s expressions of worry during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 46(8), 939–949. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsab060.CrossRefPubMed

Sarkadi, A., Lampa, E., & Warner, G. (2022). Promoting an understanding of forced migration among host country children and exploring their views on refugee children’s needs. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-022-01395-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sarkadi, A., Thell, M., & Jirblom, K. (2023). Perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic as demonstrated in drawings of Swedish children aged 4–6 years. Acta Paediatrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.16706.CrossRefPubMed

Schwenck, C., Bjorklund, D. F., & Schneider, W. (2009). Developmental and individual differences in young children’s use and maintenance of a selective memory strategy. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 1034–1050. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015597.CrossRefPubMed

Shier, H. (2001). Pathways to participation: Openings, opportunities and obligations. Children & Society, 15(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.617.CrossRef

Shier, H. (2019). An analytical tool to help researchers develop partnerships with children and adolescents. In I. R. Berson, M. J. Berson & C. Gray (red.), Participatory methodologies to elevate children’s voice and agency (pag. 295–315). Information Age.

Skyrme, S. L., & Woods, S. (2018). Researching disabled children and young people’s views on decision-making: Working reflexively to rethink vulnerability. Childhood, 25(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568218769365.CrossRef

Stalker, K. (1998). Some ethical and methodological issues in research with people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society, 13(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599826885.CrossRef

Tager-Flusberg, H., & Kasari, C. (2013). Minimally verbal school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder: The neglected end of the spectrum. Autism Research, 6(6), 468–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1329.CrossRefPubMed

Tisdall, E., & Kay, M. (2012). The challenge and challenging of childhood studies? Learning from disability studies and research with disabled children. Children & Society, 26(3), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2012.00431.x.CrossRef

Tisdall, E., & Kay, M. (2017). Conceptualising children and young people’s participation: Examining vulnerability, social accountability and co-production. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1248125.CrossRef

UN (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. UN Doc. A/ RES/44/25. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/pdf/crc.pdf

Warner, G., Durbeej, N., Salari, R., Fängström, K., Lampa, E., Baghdasaryan, Z., Osman, F., Löfving, S. G., Aronsson, A. P., Feldman, I., Sampaio, F., Ssegonja, R., Bjärtå, A., Rondung, E., Leiler, A., Wasteson, E., Calam, R., Oppedal, B., Keeshin, B., & Sarkadi, A. (2020). Evaluation of the teaching recovery techniques community-based intervention for accompanied refugee children experiencing post-traumatic stress symptoms (Accompanied refugeeS In Sweden Trial; ASsIST): Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal Open, 10(7), e35459. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035459.CrossRef

Wells, M. B., Sarkadi, A., & Salari, R. (2016). Mothers’ and fathers’ attendance in a community-based universally offered parenting program in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 44(3), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494815618841.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Zijn we klaar om te luisteren naar de stem van degenen om wie het gaat? Wat we geleerd hebben van het luisteren naar- en betrekken van kinderen bij psychologisch onderzoek met kinderen en gezinnen
Auteurs: Anna Sarkadi
Maria Thell
Karin Fängström
Anton Dahlberg
Anna Fäldt
Anna Pérez-Aronsson
Georgina Warner
Maria Eriksson
Publicatiedatum: 23-10-2024
Uitgeverij: BSL Media & Learning
Gepubliceerd in: Gezinstherapie Wereldwijd / Uitgave 4/2024
Print ISSN: 1566-0206
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-5874
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12440-024-00232-9

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Zijn we klaar om te luisteren naar de stem van degenen om wie het gaat? Wat we geleerd hebben van het luisteren naar- en betrekken van kinderen bij psychologisch onderzoek met kinderen en gezinnen

Samenvatting

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2024

Het bepalen van schermgebruik bij kinderen onder de vijf: aanbevelingen voor de ontwikkeling van opvoedingsinterventies

Ten geleide

De universele veranderingsdimensies: een systematische evaluatie van relatietechnieken

Cultureel pragmatisme: op zoek naar een andere manier van denken over culturele competentie in de geestelijke gezondheidszorg

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Het bepalen van schermgebruik bij kinderen onder de vijf: aanbevelingen voor de ontwikkeling van opvoedingsinterventies

Ten geleide

De universele veranderingsdimensies: een systematische evaluatie van relatietechnieken

Cultureel pragmatisme: op zoek naar een andere manier van denken over culturele competentie in de geestelijke gezondheidszorg