Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Ga naar:
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
BSL Shop
Inloggen

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Erasmus MC heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

» Andere revante producten voor Erasmus MC studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van Erasmus MC, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van Erasmus MC.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Gepubliceerd in:

01-09-2010

The Psychometric Properties of the Personality Assessment Inventory-Short Form (PAI-SF) in Inpatient Forensic and Civil Samples

Auteurs: Samuel J. Sinclair, Daniel Antonius, Andrew Shiva, Caleb J. Siefert, Kendra Kehl-Fie, Stephanie Lama, Hal S. Shorey, Mark A. Blais

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 3/2010

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Research focusing on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) has increased substantially over the past decade. However, there has been relatively little focus on the PAI short-form (PAISF). The current study evaluated the psychometric characteristics of the PAI-SF clinical scales using participants admitted to a large northeastern hospital under forensic (N = 178) and civil (N = 320) statutes. Results indicate that the internal consistency of the PAI-SF clinical scales is adequate for both the Forensic (range of alphas: 0.74 to 0.88) and Civil (0.79 to 0.91) samples, and assumptions of item-scale convergence and divergence were generally met with some exceptions. Finally, the PAI-SF exhibited strong agreement with the full-form PAI scores overall, and at the upper extreme (T ≥ 70) of the distributions for both samples. The results are discussed in terms of how they extend prior research on the PAI-SF.
vorige artikel A Psychometric Evaluation of the Thought Control Ability Questionnaire (TCAQ) and the Prediction of Cognitive Control
volgende artikel Measurement of Preoperative Anxiety in Young Children: Self-report Versus Observer-rated
Literatuur
Boone, D. (1998). Internal consistency reliability of the Personality Assessment Inventory with psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 839–843.CrossRefPubMed
Braxton, L. E., Calhoun, P. S., Williams, J. E., & Boggs, C. D. (2007). Validity rates of the Personality Assessment Inventory and the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 in a VA medical center setting. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 5–15.CrossRefPubMed
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.CrossRefPubMed
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.CrossRef
Deisinger, J. A. (1995). Exploring the factor structure of the Personality Assessment Inventory. Assessment, 2, 173–179.
Edens, J. F., Cruise, K. R., & Buffington-Vollum, J. K. (2001). Forensic and correctional applications of the Personality Assessment Inventory. Behavioral Science and the Law, 19, 519–543.CrossRef
Frazier, T. W., Naugle, R. I., & Haggerty, K. A. (2006). Psychometric adequacy and comparability of the short and full forms of the Personality Assessment Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 18, 324–333.CrossRefPubMed
Hoelzle, J. B., & Meyer, G. J. (2009). The invariant factor structure of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) full scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 175–186.CrossRefPubMed
Holden, R. (2000). Are there promising MMPI substitutes for assessing psychopathology and personality? Review and prospect. In R. H. Dana (Ed.), Handbook of cross-cultural and multicultural personality assessment (pp. 267–292). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Patrick, C. J., & Iacono, W. G. (2005). Externalizing psychopathology in adulthood: a dimensional-spectrum conceptualization and its implications for DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 537–550.CrossRefPubMed
McGlinchey, J. B., & Zimmerman, M. (2007). Examining a dimensional representation of depression and anxiety disorders’ comorbidity in psychiatric outpatients with item response modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 464–474.CrossRefPubMed
Morey, L. C. (1991). The Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual (2nd ed.). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Morey, L. C., & Hopwood, C. J. (2004). Efficiency of a strategy for detecting back random responding on the Personality Assessment Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 16, 197–200.CrossRefPubMed
Morey, L. C., & Quigley, B. D. (2002). The use of the Personality Assessment Inventory in assessing offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 333–349.CrossRefPubMed
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pryor, L. R., Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., & Harding, H. G. (2009). Pathological personality traits and externalizing behaviour. Personality and Mental Health, 3, 26–40.CrossRef
Sellbom, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2008). Response styles on multi-scale inventories. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intra-class correlations: use in assessing inter-rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.CrossRefPubMed
Siefert, C. J., Kehl-Fie, K. A., & Blais, M. A. (2007). Detecting back irrelevant responding on the personality assessment inventory in a psychiatric inpatient setting. Psychological Assessment, 19, 469–473.CrossRefPubMed
Sinclair, S. J., Siefert, C. J., Shorey, H. S., Antonius, D., Shiva, A., Kehl-Fie, K., et al. (in press). A psychometric evaluation of the Personality Assessment Inventory—short form clinical scales in an inpatient psychiatric sample. Psychiatry Research.
Steiger, J., & Lind, J. (1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
Walters, G. D., & Duncan, S. A. (2005). Use of the PCL-R and PAI to predict release outcome in inmates undergoing forensic evaluation. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 16, 459–476.CrossRef
Walters, G. D., Duncan, S. A., & Geyer, M. D. (2003). Predicting disciplinary adjustment in inmates undergoing forensic evaluation: a direct comparison of the PCL-R and the PAI. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 14, 382–393.CrossRef
Ware, J. E., Harris, W. J., Gandek, B. L., Rogers, B. W., & Reese, P. R. (1997). MAP Multitrait/Multi-item analysis program—revised. Boston: The Health Assessment Lab.
Wolf, E. J., Miller, M. W., Orazem, R. J., Weierich, M. R., Castillo, D. T., Milford, J., et al. (2008). The MMPI–2 restructured clinical scales in the assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid disorders. Psychological Assessment, 20, 327–340.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
The Psychometric Properties of the Personality Assessment Inventory-Short Form (PAI-SF) in Inpatient Forensic and Civil Samples
Auteurs
Samuel J. Sinclair
Daniel Antonius
Andrew Shiva
Caleb J. Siefert
Kendra Kehl-Fie
Stephanie Lama
Hal S. Shorey
Mark A. Blais
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2010
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9165-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2010

Impulsivity and Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder: Subtype Classification Using the UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale

Measurement of Preoperative Anxiety in Young Children: Self-report Versus Observer-rated

Construct Validity of the Relationship Profile Test: Links with Defense Style in Substance Abuse Patients and Comparison with Nonclinical Norms

A Psychometric Evaluation of the Thought Control Ability Questionnaire (TCAQ) and the Prediction of Cognitive Control

Potential Symptoms of ADHD for Emerging Adults

Psychopathy and APD in Non-forensic Patients: Improved Predictions or Disparities in Cut Scores?