Skip to main content

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Erasmus MC heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van Erasmus MC, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van Erasmus MC.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Top

Open Access 16-04-2025

The moderating effect of family socioeconomic status in the relationship between health-related behaviors and quality of life among the Hakka older adults in Fujian, China

Auteurs: Rongrong Liu, Jinghong Huang, Longhua Cai, Wenji Qiu, Xiaojun Liu

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research

share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
insite
ZOEKEN

Abstract

Purpose

This study examined the moderating effect of family socioeconomic status (SES) in the relationship between health-related behaviors and quality of life (QOL) among Hakka older adults from three levels: specific behaviors, the number of healthy behaviors, and behavior patterns.

Methods

A total of 1,262 participants aged 60 years or above were included in this study. The Chinese version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-OLD) with six domains was used to measure the QOL. Two-Step Cluster Analysis (TCA) was employed to determine the health-related behaviors patterns. The generalized linear regression models were utilized to reveal the relationship between specific behaviors, the number of healthy behaviors and behavior patterns, and QOL.

Results

Sleep regularity (β = 2.70, 95%CI 1.68, 3.72), physical exercise (β = 5.61, 95%CI 4.50, 6.72) were associated with higher QOL. Moreover, the higher number of healthy behaviors (from 4 to 5) were more likely to experience higher QOL, the β (95%CI) ranges from 5.08 (3.52, 6.64) to 5.82 (4.07, 7.57). Compared with the moderate-health pattern, risk-selective pattern (β = 7.432, t = 2.343, P < 0.05) and family SES (β = 4.691, t = 6.356, P < 0.001) were positively related to QOL. And the family SES exclusively moderated the risk-selective pattern (β = − 2.552, t = − 2.378 P < 0.05) on QOL.

Conclusion

Maintaining healthy behaviors is closely related to a better QOL. Potential benefits of the active management of healthy behavior may improve the QOL of Hakka older adults.
Opmerkingen
Rongrong Liu and Jinghong Huang have contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Afkortingen
QOL
Quality of life
WHOQOL-OLD
World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Older Adults Module
β
Beta coefficient
CI
Confidence interval
CHRQLS-OA 2018
2018 China Health-related Quality of Life Survey of Older Adults
SAB
Sensory Abilities
AUT
Autonomy
PPF
Past, Present, Future Activities
SOP
Social Participation
DAD
Death and Dying
INT
Intimacy
AHI
Annual household incomes
CNY
China Yuan
PCA
Principal component analysis
BIC
Bayesian criterion
ANOVA
Analysis of variance
SPSS
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
TCA
Two-step cluster analysis
M
Mean
SD
Standard deviation.
n
Subsample
Ref
Reference
CDC
Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention
SDH
Social Determinants of Health

Plain English summary

The quality of life (QOL) serves as a pivotal reference for assessing human health. However, there is a notable dearth of research focusing on the QOL of specific populations, particularly older adults. Prior studies have highlighted the significance of various health-related behaviors in influencing overall well-being and disease prevention. Within the Hakka population in China, different traditions and practices may shape their health-related behaviors, potentially impacting their QOL. In this study, we have explored the relationship between health-related behaviors and QOL among Hakka older adults, considering the moderating effect of family socioeconomic status (SES). This study indicates that specific health-related behaviors, the number of healthy behaviors and behavior patterns are associated with QOL. The insights from this study encourage further research into health-related behaviors approaches in the context of QOL.

Introduction

The global trend of population ageing presents critical challenges worldwide, with China being no exception to this demographic transformation. The projected steep increase in the number of Chinese older adults (aged 60 and above), from 254 million in 2019 to 402 million in 2040, highlights the urgency of this issue. This substantial growth represents a formidable 28% of the total population aged 60 or above [1]. China has already entered an ageing society and will continue to age rapidly in the future [2]. In analogous situations, most developed countries have implemented vigorous measures to address the issues arising from an ageing population. Chinese policymakers and society need to adapt promptly to this demographic shift. The prospect of continued rapid ageing highlights the importance of necessitating preventive actions aimed at safeguarding well-being. The transition from focusing “how to live longer” to prioritizing “how to live better” marks a crucial juncture in the current ageing process in China. Improving the quality of life (QOL) of older adults is of key significance for raising healthy life expectancy [3].
Studies have suggested that the QOL of older adults differs significantly from that of the general population [4], thereby highlighting their unique needs and challenges. Hakka older adults not only face health and QOL challenges similar to those of other aging populations but are also deeply influenced by their unique cultural background and family socioeconomic status (SES). There are approximately 80 million Hakka people worldwide, with 50 million residing in China. The term “Hakka” not only refers to this ethnic group but also represents a rich cultural heritage developed over thousands of years [5], particularly about wine culture. Due to the humid climate of their traditional settlements, Hakka people have developed Hakka wine, which is believed to dispel cold and nourish the blood, making it a common part of daily life. During festivals, wine serves as a customary gift and plays a vital role in honoring gods and ancestors. It is an essential medium for expressing affection and strengthening social bonds. Notably, Hakka older adults place great importance on preserving and practicing this cultural tradition. Despite extensive exploration of QOL dynamics across diverse age groups, including younger [6], children and adolescents [7, 8], and specific special populations [9, 10], a notable gap persists in understanding of QOL specifically among older adults, particularly in the context of family SES. Recognizing the paramount significance and frequently overlooked aspect of QOL deprivation in older adults, it is imperative to delve into the modifiable factors that can positively influence and raise their living standards. Family SES plays a crucial role in shaping health-related behaviors, which contribute significantly to an individual’s overall health status [11, 12]. Moreover, the efficacy of interventions designed to modify these behaviors exhibits a distinct population-specific profile [13, 14], emphasizing the necessity for tailored strategies. Research focusing on older adults has demonstrated that targeted interventions aimed at health-related behaviors can effectively improve their QOL and overall health status [15], thereby underscoring their potential for a positive shift.
Despite extensive inquiry into the individual associations between specific health-related behaviors and QOL, including physical exercise [16], a healthy diet [17], and sleeping [18]. These available studies have focused on the relationship between specific health-related behaviors and QOL, overlooking the comprehensive impact of multiple health-related behaviors on QOL. Importantly, various health-related behaviors are interconnected and mutually influence each other, not occurring in isolation [19].
Therefore, this research endeavors to bridge the existing gaps by meticulously exploring the associations between specific health-related behaviors, the number of healthy behaviors, behavior patterns, and QOL, considering the moderating effect of family SES.

Methods

Design and participants

Participants were recruited from Ninghua, China, where Hakka people gathered, through trained interviewers and the standard questionnaire during the 2018 Spring Festival using convenience sampling. The data collection was nested in a large cross-sectional survey, the 2018 China Health-related Quality of Life Survey of Older Adults (CHRQLS-OA 2018) [20]. The data employed in this study encompassed participants’ social demographic information, health-related behaviors, and QOL. Several inclusion criteria were considered during the implementation of data collection: (1) participants aged 60 years old or above, (2) participants with local household registration, and (3) participants who voluntarily participated in this survey. The following participants were excluded: (1) participants who did not conduct normal conversation due to aphasia, deafness, or other critical body illnesses, (2) participants with severe mental disorders or had been diagnosed with cognitive impairment, and (3) participants who lost their daily living abilities. Consequently, we collected 1,500 questionnaires and 1,262 were valid after controlling data quality, with an effective rate of 84.13%.

Measures

QOL is an individual’s perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and concerning their goals, expectations, standards, and concerns [21]. The assessment of QOL was conducted utilizing the Chinese version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-OLD) [22, 23]. The Chinese version of the WHOQOL-OLD has demonstrated good internal consistency and reliability, as previous research shows [22]. Appendix 1 presents the final version of the WHOQOL-OLD module.
QQL was assessed using the Chinese version of the WHOQOL-OLD is a five-point Likert scale, that consists of 24 items divided into 6 domains (each of the domains has 4 items), including Sensory Abilities (SAB), Autonomy (AUT), Past, Present, Future Activities (PPF), Social Participation (SOP), Death and Dying (DAD), and Intimacy (INT). QQL ranges from 24 to 120, and higher scores suggest better QOL.
Health-related behaviors were considered in three dimensions: specific health-related behaviors, the number of healthy behaviors, and behavior patterns. Specific health-related behaviors included “healthy diet”, “sleep regularity”, “physical exercise”, “smoking”, and “drinking”. The number of healthy behaviors is calculated as the sum of the incidences of “healthy diet”, “regular sleep”, “physical exercise”, “non-smoking”, and “non-drinking”. The number of health-related behaviors with a minimum count of 0 (10.70%) and a maximum count of 5 (16.96%) behaviors per individual. The detailed criteria and results concerning these health-related behaviors have been reported in our prior research [24].

Family socioeconomic status (SES)

Family SES is typically indicated by the education and employment of family members, as well as family income [2527]. In this study, six indicators were selected to assess the family SES of older adults: education level, average annual household incomes (AHI, Chinese Yuan, CNY), current residence, employment before retirement, current employment, and personal savings were considered as confounder factors. Education level was classified as follows: illiterate, literacy class/home school, primary school, and junior high school or above. AHI were categorized as 15,000 or below, 15,001–30,000, 30,001–45,000, 45,001–60,000, and 60,001 or above. Current residence was categorized into village, town, and county. Employment before retirement was categorized as farming and non-farming. Current employment status was categorized as yes and no. Personal savings were categorized as 10,000 or below, 10,001–30,000, 30,001–50,000, 50,001–70,000, and 70,001 or above. Concurrently, the principal component analysis (PCA) method was employed to construct a family SES for a comprehensive evaluation, following established precedents in prior research. The specific family SES variables and their corresponding assignment protocols for this study are outlined in detail in Appendix 2.

Covariates

In this study, age, sex, education level, marital status, current residence, living arrangements, AHI, and current employment status were considered as confounder factors. Age was classified into the following categories: 60–64 years, 65–69 years, 70–74 years, 75–79 years, and 80 years and above. Sex was categorized as male or female. Education level was classified as follows: illiterate, literacy class/home school, primary school, and junior high school or above. Marital status was categorized as married / cohabitation, widowed, and others (unmarried, divorced, separated, etc.). Current residence was categorized into village, town, and county. Living arrangements were categorized as follows: living alone, living with spouse only, living with children, mixed habitation, and others (including living only with grandchildren, living with others, nursing home, etc.). AHI were categorized as 15,000 or below, 15,001–30,000, 30,001–45,000, 45,001–60,000, and 60,001 or above. Current employment status was categorized as yes and no.

Statistical analyses

Categorical variables were described as frequency (proportion). Continuous variables were described as mean (SD) because they are normally distributed. Two-Step Cluster Analysis (TCA) was employed in five health-related behaviors to determine the behavioral patterns among Hakka older adults. The TCA process serves as an exploratory tool that automatically identifies the optimal number of clusters [28]. It consists of two main stages: preclustering and hierarchical clustering, and hierarchical algorithms utilize silhouette width to determine the best clustering number [29]. For measuring clustering distance, the log-likelihood method is employed, while Schwarz’s Bayesian criterion (BIC) serves as the basis for clustering evaluation [28, 29].
We used t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to explore whether participants differed between specific health-related behaviors, the number of healthy behaviors, behavior patterns, and QOL. Generalized linear regression model was used to explore the relationship between specific health-related behaviors, the number of healthy behaviors, behavior patterns, and QOL. Two models were considered. Model 1 was the crude model. Model 2 was adjusted model, adjusted for age, sex, education level, marital status, current residence, living arrangements, AHI, and current employment status. The comprehensive score coefficients of the six items of education level, AHI, current residence, employment before retired, current employment, and personal savings were calculated by the method of principal component analysis, and then normalized as the weight coefficients of each item to construct the family SES (The weights of family SES indicators based on principal component analysis in this study are shown in Appendix 3). The PROCESS macro of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used to analyze the moderation model [30]. Model 1 was used to evaluate whether the family SES played a moderating role between the behavior patterns of Hakka older adults and QOL. All analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 and Mplus (version 8.3). Two-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Scores of QOL of the Hakka older adults

As summarized shown in Table 1, the QOL score ranged from SAB (11.65 ± 2.51) to AUT (12.73 ± 3.06). The total score is 73.52 ± 8.52.
Table 1
QOL scores for Hakka older adults (n = 1262)
Domains
M ± SD
SAB
11.65 ± 2.51
AUT
12.73 ± 3.06
PPF
12.58 ± 2.85
SOP
12.30 ± 2.83
DAD
12.58 ± 2.41
INT
11.68 ± 2.61
Total
73.52 ± 8.52
M mean; SD standard deviation; SAB sensory abilities; AUT autonomy; PPF past, present, and future activities; SOP social participation; DAD death and dying; INT intimacy

QOL among Hakka older adults with health-related behaviors

Table 2 shows that the total score of QOL in healthy diet participants was 75.86 ± 8.61, while the scores of six dimensions of QOL (SAB to INT) were 10.80 ± 2.42 to 12.46 ± 2.22. The total score among non-healthy diet participants was significantly lower than healthy diet participants (P < 0.01). The total score of QOL in sleep regularity participants was 76.92 ± 8.45, while the scores of six dimensions of QOL (SAB to INT) were 10.62 ± 2.43 to 12.73 ± 2.14. The total score among non-sleep regularity participants was significantly lower than sleep regularity participants (P < 0.01). The total score of QOL in physical exercise participants was 78.06 ± 6.53, while the scores of six dimensions of QOL (SAB to INT) were 10.28 ± 2.20 to 13.02 ± 1.89. The total score of QOL in smoking participants was 70.80 ± 7.59, while the scores of six dimensions of QOL (SAB to INT) were 13.05 ± 2.00 to 10.68 ± 2.56. The total score among non-smoking participants was significantly higher than smoking participants (P < 0.01). The SAB to DAD in drinking participants was 11.28 ± 2.76 to 12.53 ± 2.38. The SAB among non-smoking participants was significantly lower than smoking participants (P < 0.001).
Table 2
QOL scores stratified by different health-related behaviors
Domains
SAB
AUT
PPF
SOP
DAD
INT
Total Score
Healthy Diet
       
 No
12.64 ± 2.23
11.65 ± 2.77
11.28 ± 2.43
11.07 ± 2.42
13.42 ± 2.61
10.77 ± 2.74
70.82 ± 7.58
 Yes
10.80 ± 2.42
13.67 ± 2.99
13.72 ± 2.70
13.36 ± 2.72
11.85 ± 1.94
12.46 ± 2.22
75.86 ± 8.61
 t
4.580***
− 12.499**
− 16.918**
− 15.834***
11.967***
− 11.920***
− 11.066**
Sleep Regularity
       
 No
12.94 ± 1.95
10.94 ± 2.31
10.81 ± 2.09
10.53 ± 2.14
13.71 ± 2.49
10.37 ± 2.56
69.31 ± 6.49
 Yes
10.62 ± 2.43
14.18 ± 2.82
14.02 ± 2.56
13.71 ± 2.50
11.66 ± 1.89
12.73 ± 2.14
76.92 ± 8.45
 t
18.806***
− 22.396***
− 24.543***
− 24.373***
16.116***
− 17.437***
− 18.084**
Physical Exercise
       
 No
13.00 ± 2.01
10.79 ± 2.45
10.88 ± 2.29
10.42 ± 2.09
13.63 ± 2.52
10.36 ± 2.55
69.08 ± 7.89
 Yes
10.28 ± 2.20
14.72 ± 2.24
14.33 ± 2.24
14.22 ± 2.09
11.50 ± 1.71
13.02 ± 1.89
78.06 ± 6.53
 t
22.921***
− 29.681
− 27.077
− 32.267
17.625***
− 21.052***
− 22.022
Smoking
       
 No
11.25 ± 2.50
13.09 ± 3.10
12.96 ± 2.86
12.71 ± 2.80
12.33 ± 2.40
11.97 ± 2.56
74.31 ± 8.62
 Yes
13.05 ± 2.00
11.48 ± 2.56
11.30 ± 2.41
10.84 ± 2.41
13.45 ± 2.22
10.68 ± 2.56
70.80 ± 7.59
 t
− 12.512***
8.858***
9.736***
11.067***
− 7.029
7.456
6.631**
Drinking
       
 No
11.94 ± 2.26
12.55 ± 2.96
12.50 ± 2.75
12.27 ± 2.75
12.61 ± 2.43
11.58 ± 2.62
73.46 ± 8.10
 Yes
11.28 ± 2.76
12.96 ± 3.18
12.69 ± 2.98
12.33 ± 2.93
12.53 ± 2.38
11.80 ± 2.60
73.60 ± 9.05
 t
4.580***
− 2.349***
− 1.136*
− 0.350***
0.557*
− 1.518
− 0.288
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
SAB sensory abilities; AUT autonomy; PPF past, present, and future activities; SOP social participation; DAD death and dying; INT intimacy
As demonstrated in Table 3, in the total score, the scores of 5 healthy behaviors were statistically higher than those from 0 to 4 healthy behaviors. The mean values of the total score were significantly different in all domains and the overall level among individuals with different number of healthy behaviors (P < 0.001). Moreover, the lowest scores of SAB, AUT, and SOP were observed in 2 healthy behaviors, the lowest scores of DAD and INT were observed in 0 healthy behaviors, while the highest scores in all domains were found in 5 healthy behaviors.
Table 3
QOL scores stratified by the number of healthy behaviors
Number
SAB
AUT
PPF
SOP
DAD
INT
Total Score
0
13.41 ± 2.27
11.16 ± 2.31
10.84 ± 2.25
10.38 ± 2.19
14.19 ± 2.21
10.07 ± 2.52
70.06 ± 7.49
1
13.08 ± 1.63
10.65 ± 2.03
10.40 ± 2.00
10.29 ± 1.67
13.46 ± 2.35
10.34 ± 2.51
68.21 ± 5.38
2
12.99 ± 1.79
10.61 ± 2.54
10.60 ± 2.11
10.19 ± 1.97
14.14 ± 2.42
10.24 ± 2.85
68.76 ± 6.99
3
11.57 ± 2.51
12.26 ± 2.94
12.31 ± 2.55
11.81 ± 2.66
12.16 ± 2.43
11.57 ± 2.07
71.68 ± 9.30
4
10.53 ± 2.29
14.56 ± 2.53
14.10 ± 2.34
14.08 ± 2.20
11.51 ± 1.95
12.94 ± 2.08
77.72 ± 7.37
5
10.15 ± 2.21
14.88 ± 2.16
14.99 ± 2.01
14.68 ± 1.75
11.49 ± 1.28
13.16 ± 1.84
79.35 ± 5.80
F
91.558***
146.076 ***
172.921 ***
229.209 ***
79.096 ***
75.432 ***
114.866
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
SAB sensory abilities; AUT autonomy; PPF past, present, and future activities; SOP social participation; DAD death and dying; INT intimacy

Relationship between QOL and health-related behavior among Hakka older adults

Table 4 shows healthy diet was significantly associated with SAB, PPF, SOP, DAD, and INT, the adjusted β (95% CI) from − 0.62 (− 0.87, − 0.37) for DAD to 0.75 (0.51, 0.99) for PPF, except for AUT and total score. Sleep regularity was significantly associated with QOL, the adjusted β (95% CI) from − 0.63 (− 0.94, − 0.33) for DAD to 2.70 (1.68, 3.72) for total score, except for SAB. Physical exercise was significantly associated with QOL, the adjusted β (95% CI) from − 0.62 (− 0.95, − 0.28) for DAD to 5.61 (4.50, 6.72) for total score, except for SAB. Smoking was only positively associated with SAB (β = 1.01,95%CI 0.76, 1.26). Drinking was only negatively associated with SAB (β = − 0.66,95%CI − 0.85, − 0.46).
Table 4
The relationship between specific health-related behavior and QOL in Hakka older adults (Reference = No)
 
SAB
AUT
PPF
SOP
DAD
INT
Total Score
β (95%CI)
Model 1
       
 Healthy Diet
− 0.76 (− 1.00, − 0.52)***
0.48 (0.20, 0.76)**
1.08 (0.82, 1.33)***
0.83 (0.59, 1.07)***
− 0.71 (− 0.96, − 0.45)***
0.64 (0.37, 0.90)***
1.55 (0.68, 2.42)**
 Sleep Regularity
− 0.77 (− 1.05, − 0.48)***
1.35 (1.03, 1.67)***
1.49 (1.19, 1.79)***
1.20 (0.92, 1.48)***
− 0.99 (− 1.28, − 0.69)***
1.02 (0.71, 1.33)***
3.30 (2.29, 4.32)***
 Physical Exercise
− 1.75 (− 2.03, − 1.48)***
3.03 (2.72, 3.35)***
2.27 (1.98, 2.56)***
2.82 (2.55, 3.09)***
− 1.32 (− 1.61, − 1.03)***
1.84 (1.54, 2.15)***
6.89 (5.91, 7.87)***
 Smoking
1.02 (0.71, 1.32)***
0.10 (− 0.25, 0.45)
0.05 (− 0.28, 0.37)
− 0.08 (− 0.38, 0.23)
0.06 (− 0.27, 0.39)
− 0.09 (− 0.43, 0.25)
1.06 (− 0.04, 2.16)
 Drinking
− 1.07 (− 1.31, − 0.83)***
0.51 (0.24, 0.79)***
0.32 (0.07, 0.57)*
0.21 (− 0.03, 0.45)
− 0.19 (− 0.45, 0.06)
0.36 (0.10, 0.62)**
0.14 (− 0.71, 1.00)
Model 2
       
 Healthy Diet
− 0.36 (− 0.55, − 0.17)***
0.08 (− 0.18, 0.33)
0.75 (0.51, 0.99)***
0.49 (0.28, 0.71)***
− 0.62 (− 0.87, − 0.37)***
0.43 (0.17, 0.68)**
0.77 (− 0.06, 1.60)
 Sleep Regularity
− 0.14 (− 0.38, 0.09)
0.82 (0.51, 1.13)***
1.08 (0.79, 1.38)***
0.75 (0.48, 1.02)***
− 0.63 (− 0.94, − 0.33)***
0.82 (0.51, 1.13)***
2.70 (1.68, 3.72)***
 Physical Exercise
− 0.23 (− 0.48, 0.03)
1.99 (1.65, 2.33)***
1.38 (1.06, 1.70)***
1.80 (1.51, 2.09)***
− 0.62 (− 0.95, − 0.28)***
1.28 (0.94, 1.62)***
5.61 (4.50, 6.72)***
 Smoking
1.01 (0.76, 1.26)***
0.19 (− 0.15, 0.52)
− 0.01 (− 0.32, 0.31)
− 0.12 (− 0.40, 0.17)
0.13 (− 0.19, 0.46)
− 0.22 (− 0.55, 0.11)
0.99 (− 0.10, 2.07)
 Drinking
− 0.66 (− 0.85, − 0.46)***
0.21 (-0.05, 0.48)
0.17 (− 0.08, 0.41)
0.09 (− 0.13, 0.32)
− 0.04 (− 0.30, 0.22)
0.00 (− 0.26, 0.26)
− 0.23 (− 1.08, 0.63)
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
Model 1: Crude model
Model 2: Adjusted model, including age, sex, education level, marital status, current residence, living arrangements, average annual household incomes (AHI), and current employment
As shown in Table 5, participants with three healthy behaviors were at higher SAB (β = − 0.82, 95% CI − 1.18, − 0.47), PPF (β = 0.71, 95% CI 0.27, 1.14), SOP (β = 0.58, 95% CI 0.19, 0.98), DAD (β = − 1.38, 95% CI − 1.82, − 0.94), INT (β = 0.95, 95% CI 0.50, 1.40), except for AUT and total score. Participants with four healthy behaviors were more likely to experience QOL, the β (95%CI) ranges from − 1.79 (− 2.25, − 1.33) for DAD to 5.08 (3.52, 6.64) for total score. Participants with five healthy behaviors were more likely to experience QOL, the β (95%CI) ranges from − 1.67 (− 2.19, − 1.15) for DAD to 5.82 (4.07, 7.57) for total score.
Table 5
The relationship between the number of healthy behaviors and QOL in Hakka older adults (Reference = 0)
 
SAB
AUT
PPF
SOP
DAD
INT
Total Score
β (95%CI)
Model 1
       
 1
− 0.34 (− 0.88, 0.21)
− 0.52 (− 1.14, 0.11)
− 0.45 (− 1.01, 0.12)
− 0.09 (− 0.62, 0.45)
− 0.73 (− 1.25, − 0.20)**
0.26 (− 0.31, 0.84)
− 1.85 (− 3.68, − 0.01)*
 2
− 0.43 (− 0.89, 0.04)
− 0.56 (− 1.09, − 0.03)*
− 0.25 (− 0.73, 0.23)
− 0.19 (− 0.64, 0.26)
− 0.05 (− 0.50, 0.40)
0.17 (− 0.32, 0.66)
− 1.30 (− 2.86, 0.26)
 3
− 1.84 (− 2.30, − 1.38)***
1.10 (0.57, 1.62)***
1.47 (0.99, 1.94)***
1.43 (0.98, 1.88)***
− 2.02 (− 2.47, − 1.58)***
1.49 (1.01, 1.98)***
1.62 (0.07, 3.17)*
 4
− 2.89 (− 3.32, − 2.45)***
3.40 (2.90, 3.90)***
3.26 (2.81, 3.71)***
3.70 (3.27, 4.13)***
− 2.68 (− 3.10, − 2.25)***
2.86 (2.40, 3.32)***
7.66 (6.19, 9.13)***
 5
− 3.26 (− 3.73, − 2.79)***
3.72 (3.18, 4.25)***
4.14 (3.66, 4.63)***
4.30 (3.84, 4.76)***
− 2.69 (− 3.15, − 2.24)***
3.09 (2.60, 3.58)***
9.29 (7.71, 10.87)***
Model 2
       
 1
0.09 (− 0.31, 0.48)
− 0.68 (− 1.20, − 0.15)*
− 0.49 (− 0.98, 0.00)*
− 0.17 (− 0.61, 0.28)
− 0.66 (− 1.15, − 0.16)*
0.25 (− 0.26, 0.77)
− 1.65 (− 3.34, 0.04)
 2
− 0.45 (− 0.79, − 0.10)*
− 0.55 (− 1.01, − 0.10)*
− 0.10 (− 0.53, 0.32)
− 0.09 (− 0.47, 0.30)
− 0.23 (− 0.66, 0.20)
0.41 (− 0.03, 0.85)
− 1.00 (− 2.47, 0.46)
 3
− 0.82 (− 1.18, − 0.47)***
0.04 (− 0.42, 0.50)
0.71 (0.27, 1.14)**
0.58 (0.19, 0.98)**
− 1.38 (− 1.82, − 0.94)***
0.95 (0.50, 1.40)***
0.08 (− 1.42, 1.57)
 4
− 1.05 (− 1.42, − 0.68)***
1.59 (1.10, 2.07)***
1.99 (1.54, 2.45)***
2.21 (1.80, 2.63)***
− 1.79 (− 2.25, − 1.33)***
2.13 (1.65, 2.60)***
5.08 (3.52, 6.64)***
 5
− 0.75 (− 1.16, − 0.34)***
1.33 (0.78, 1.87)***
2.34 (1.84, 2.85)***
2.23 (1.77, 2.70)***
− 1.67 (− 2.19, − 1.15)***
2.33 (1.81, 2.86)***
5.82 (4.07, 7.57)***
Notes: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
Model 1: Crude model
Model 2: Adjusted model, including age, sex, education level, marital status, current residence, living arrangements, average annual household incomes (AHI), and current employment

Cluster analysis of behavior patterns

In the two-step cluster analysis (TCA), 32 clustering variables were entered to identify the subjects’ behavior patterns, and the better models were finally determined as 3 clusters, which exhibited good-quality clustering (Fig. 1). The 3 clusters are presented in Fig. 2 and Table 6. Cluster 1 demonstrated a moderate level of engagement in various health-related behaviors. Notably, this cluster reported no smoking or drinking. Consequently, cluster 1 is named the “moderate-health pattern” and accounted 17.0% of the total sample. Cluster 2 showed lower engagement in health-related behaviors, except for drinking. This cluster reported a significant proportion of drinking (with 0% smoking). The drinking stands out as a distinctive feature, suggesting selective adoption of health-related behaviors. Consequently, cluster 2 is named the “risk-selective pattern,” accounting 13.2% of the total sample. Cluster 3 exhibited a paradoxical behavior pattern, characterized by universal smoking and involvement in various health-related behaviors. Despite some positive behaviors, smoking and drinking dominated, categorizing it as a high-risk cluster. It is named the “paradoxical-health pattern” and accounts 69.8% of the total sample.
Table 6
The distribution of specific behaviors across three clusters (n, %)
Cluster
Healthy diet (%)
Regular sleep (%)
Physical exercise (%)
Smoking (%)
Drinking (%)
1
214 (31.66)
214 (30.62)
214 (34.29)
0 (0.00)
0 (0.00)
2
167 (24.70)
167 (23.89)
167 (26.76)
0 (0.00)
167 (30.20)
3
295 (43.64)
318 (45.49)
243 (38.94)
282 (100.00)
386 (69.80)
Total
676 (53.57)
699 (55.39)
613 (49.45)
282 (22.35)
553 (43.82)

The moderating effect of family SES on the relationship between behavior patterns and QOL

Risk-selective pattern (β = − 3.005, t = − 4.045, P < 0.001) and family SES (β = − 2.048, t = − 11.848, P < 0.001) were negatively related to SAB. The interaction effect of risk-selective pattern and family SES (β = 0.751, t = 2.987, P < 0.01) was significant on SAB. Risk-selective pattern (β = 2.427, t = 2.547, P < 0.05) and family SES (β = 1.817, t = 8.197, P < 0.001) were positively related to AUT. Paradoxical-health pattern (β = − 1.921, t = − 2.900, P < 0.01) was negatively related to AUT. However, the interaction effect was not significant.
Risk-selective pattern (β = 3.844, t = 4.291, P < 0.001) and family SES (β = 1.952, t = 9.365, P < 0.001) were positively related to PPF. The interaction effects of the risk-selective pattern and family SES (β = − 1.316, t = − 4.343, P < 0.001) was also affect PPF. In addition, the interaction effect of paradoxical-health pattern and family SES on PPF was not significant. Looking at the moderating effect of the describing, risk-selective pattern (β = 1.958, t = 2.357, P < 0.05) and family SES (β = 1.776, t = 9.191, P < 0.001) were positively related to SOP. However, paradoxical-health pattern (β = − 1.950, t = − 3.377, P < 0.001) was negatively related to SOP. Furthermore, the interaction effect between risk-selective pattern and family SES (β = − 0.609, t = − 2.167, P < 0.05) was negatively related to SOP. The interaction effect of paradoxical-health pattern and family SES on SOP was not significant.
Risk-selective pattern (β = − 2.450, t = − 2.536, P < 0.05) was negatively related to DAD. In addition, the interaction effect of paradoxical-health pattern and family SES on DAD (β = − 1.344, t = − 5.544, P < 0.001) was significant. However, the paradoxical-health pattern (β = 4.098, t = 6.101, P < 0.001) was positively related to DAD, so was the interaction effect of risk-selective pattern and family SES (β = 0.675, t = 2.066, P < 0.05) on DAD.
Risk-selective pattern (β = 4.659, t = 4.811, P < 0.001) and family SES (β = 1.105, t = 4.904, P < 0.001) were positively related to INT. In addition, the interaction effect of the risk-selective pattern and family SES (β = − 1.461, t = − 4.461, P < 0.001) also affected INT. The paradoxical-health pattern (β = − 1.931, t = − 2.867, P < 0.01) was negatively related to INT. Furthermore, the interaction effect of the paradoxical-health pattern and family SES (β = 0.500, t = 2.056, P < 0.05) also affected INT.
Risk-selective pattern (β = 7.432, t = 2.343, P < 0.05) and family SES (β = 4.691, t = 6.356, P < 0.001) were positively related to Total Score. The interaction effect between risk-selective pattern and family SES (β = − 2.552, t = -2.378, P < 0.05) was negatively related to Total Score. However, the interaction effect between paradoxical-health pattern and family SES was not significant. The results are presented in Table 7.
Table 7
The moderating effect of family SES score on behavior patterns and QOL scores
Domains
Predictors
β
SE
t
R2
SAB
Risk-selective pattern
− 3.005
0.743
− 4.045***
0.590
Paradoxical− health pattern
0.001
0.517
0.001
Family SES
− 2.048
0.173
− 11.848***
Risk-selective pattern × Family SES
0.751
0.251
2.987**
Paradoxical-health pattern × Family SES
0.102
0.187
0.549
AUT
Risk-selective pattern
2.427
0.953
2.547*
0.547
Paradoxical-health pattern
− 1.921
0.663
− 2.900**
Family SES
1.817
0.222
8.197***
Risk-selective pattern × Family SES
− 0.592
0.322
− 1.837
Paradoxical-health pattern × Family SES
0.341
0.239
1.425
PPF
Risk-selective pattern
3.844
0.896
4.291***
0.538
Paradoxical-health pattern
− 1.180
0.623
− 1.894
Family SES
1.952
0.208
9.365***
Risk-selective pattern × Family SES
− 1.316
0.303
− 4.343***
Paradoxical-health pattern × Family SES
− 0.134
0.225
− 0.594
SOP
Risk-selective pattern
1.958
0.831
2.357*
0.596
Paradoxical-health pattern
− 1.950
0.578
− 3.377**
Family SES
1.776
0.193
9.191***
Risk-selective pattern × Family SES
− 0.609
0.281
− 2.167*
Paradoxical-health pattern × Family SES
0.196
0.209
0.942
DAD
Risk-selective pattern
− 2.450
0.966
− 2.536*
0.246
Paradoxical-health pattern
4.098
0.672
6.101***
Family SES
0.090
0.225
0.400
Risk-selective pattern × Family SES
0.675
0.327
2.066*
Paradoxical-health pattern × Family SES
− 1.344
0.242
− 5.544***
INT
Risk-selective pattern
4.659
0.968
4.811***
0.358
Paradoxical-health pattern
− 1.931
0.673
− 2.867**
Family SES
1.105
0.225
4.904***
Risk-selective pattern × Family SES
− 1.461
0.328
− 4.461***
Paradoxical-health pattern × Family SES
0.500
0.243
2.056*
Total Score
Risk-selective pattern
7.432
3.172
2.343*
0.352
Paradoxical-health pattern
− 2.884
2.206
− 1.307
Family SES
4.691
0.738
6.356***
Risk-selective pattern × Family SES
− 2.552
1.073
− 2.378*
Paradoxical-health pattern × Family SES
− 0.339
0.797
− 0.425
Using cluster 1 moderate-health pattern as a reference; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
SES socioeconomic status; SAB sensory abilities; AUT autonomy; PPF past, present, and future activities; SOP social participation; DAD death and dying; INT intimacy

Discussion

In this study, the association between specific health-related behaviors, the number of healthy behaviors, and behavior patterns and QOL were examined in Hakka older adults (aged 60 +). Sleep regularity and physical exercise were positively associated with QOL. The number of healthy behaviors (from 4 to 5) served as a protective factor for QOL. Compared with the moderate-health pattern, the risk-selective pattern and family SES were positively related to QOL. And the family SES exclusively moderated the risk-selective pattern on QOL.
Healthy diet [17], sleep regularity [31], and physical exercise [32] significantly improve QOL among older adults. Prior research found a positive correlation between healthy dietary patterns and QOL [33]. Dietary patterns of healthful plant-based food were considered a protective factor for cognitive ability [34]. Sleep may positively influence QOL among older adults with type 2 diabetes [35]. Light physical activity has been associated with improved overall cognitive function among older adults, particularly in domains such as orientation, attention, concentration, and language abilities [36], and is beneficial to older adults’ physical well-being [37]. Importantly, our findings showed the accumulation of health-related behaviors was positively correlated with higher QOL. Interaction roles in multiple health-related behaviors, affecting each other, not isolation [19]. For example, eating habits influence sleep quality [38], such as the Mediterranean diet, a widely acknowledged beneficial dietary pattern [39, 40], has been associated with high-quality sleep [41]. The combination of healthy eating and physical activity exhibits a preventive effect against certain diseases [42, 43]. Meanwhile, appropriate physical exercise has been demonstrated to improve sleep quality [44], leading to a higher QOL [45]. The findings of this study were also confirmed in the Hakka older adults: participants with a higher number of healthy behaviors scored higher on the QOL domain (from 3.13 ± 0.32 to 3.74 ± 0.78), and were more likely to develop higher QOL (P < 0.05).
In this study, there was no significant correlation between smoking and QOL, but it is worth noting that there was a significant positive correlation between smoking and SAB in QOL among Hakka older adults, which is consistent with previous studies [46]. The age-related physical limitations in smokers are more pronounced compared to those in non-smokers, and the disparity increases with age [47]. Notably, drinking was negatively related to with SAB in QOL. That is, the lower the probability of drinking, the more sensory abilities is affected, which is consistent with previous research [48, 49]. Some studies also reported health benefits of moderate drinking [50, 51], this notion remains controversial in the global literature [52]. For example, drinking has been linked to improved mental health [53], especially among those experiencing anxiety. On the other hand, excessive drinking has been associated with significant health risks, including higher alcohol consumption, episodic binge drinking, and the intake of high-alcohol-content beverages, all of which have been linked to increased mortality rates [54]. In China, alcohol (such as Chinese Baijiu, Huangjiu, and Rice wine) plays a unique cultural role. In the cultural context, individuals tend to drink to alleviate their anxiety [55]. In Hakka areas, in which malaria prevalence contributes to the custom of wine-making and medicinal ingestion. Moreover, health policies in China do not prohibit drinking, and the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicates that moderate drinking (1–2 standard drinks/day) may confer health benefits, including a reduced risk of ischemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus, among adults (aged 40 +). In summary, this policy framework aligns with our findings, which indicate a positive relationship between drinking and higher QOL, supporting the notion that moderate alcohol consumption may have health-promoting effects. When formulating drinking-related policies, it is essential to enhance public awareness by promoting moderate drinking. Additionally, improving the packaging and labeling of alcoholic beverages with clear guidelines on responsible consumption can help mitigate risks. Lastly, preserving local and traditional drinking cultures while balancing public health concerns is crucial. Policymakers should consider regional and ethnic drinking customs to ensure that regulations both protect public health and respect cultural heritage.
In SAB, family SES significantly buffered the negative impact of risk-selective pattern. These results align with previous research suggesting that higher SES can buffer the adverse consequences of health-risk behaviors through resource accumulation [56, 57]. Our results suggest that family SES negatively moderated the positive effect of risk-selective pattern on PPF. The rewarding effect of alcohol temporarily enhances an individual’s sense of self-affirmation, especially when recognized as a “drinker status” in social interactions [58]. A large number of studies have also demonstrated the positive effects of alcohol on mental health [59, 60]. The negative moderating effect of family SES can be thought of as an alternative reward mechanism in social learning theory [61], whereby high SES groups derive satisfaction from occupational achievements, social activities, etc., thus reducing alcohol dependence [62].
In this study, family SES negatively moderated the positive effect of risk-selective pattern on SOP as well as INT, and past research suggests that alcohol consumption may act as a social enjoyment good that enhances social ties and interactions among people [63]. Individuals who also had regular drinking places had more emotionally supportive friends and a stronger sense of community belonging [64]. These findings are consistent with our findings. High SES individuals typically have broader and more diverse social networks that include not only family and friends, but also community leaders, educational institutions, and business executives, etc., and as a result, they show higher levels of motivation in social participation [65]. Drinking behaviors high SES individuals are perceived negatively in some settings, which can reduce their effective participation and exert a negative effect [66].On the other hand, our study showed that family SES buffered the negative effect of paradoxical-health pattern on INT. Consistent with our results, it has been shown that individuals who smoking and drinking for a long period of time have a higher rate of chronic diseases, require frequent medical or home recuperation, and have fewer opportunities to socialize [66]. In contrast, high SES individuals often have access to higher quality healthcare services, including more advanced medical equipment, more professional healthcare teams, and more comprehensive treatment plans [67], which can provide physiological safeguards for sustained social participation.
The results of this study suggest that family SES negatively moderated the positive effect of risk-selective pattern on DAD. Individuals with higher family SES who engage in smoking and drinking may mitigate the physical damage caused by these habits through access to better medical treatment [68]. Consequently, despite these bad habits, their fear of death may not be significantly diminished [69]. For total score, family SES primarily functioned as a risk buffer rather than a health amplifier, further reinforcing its role as a “buffer” against risky behaviors rather than an “amplifier” for health behaviors. This finding is consistent with the core mind of the Social Determinants of Health (SDH) theory which posits that SES improves overall well-being by reducing health disparities [70]. The nonsignificant moderation of the paradoxical-health pattern implies that socioeconomic resources alone cannot resolve intrinsic behavioral contradictions.

Strengths and limitations

This study explored health-related behaviors and QOL among Hakka older adults. TCA was used to identify the behavior patterns, which overcomes the limitations of traditional analytical approaches. Combined with regression analysis, this approach provides valuable insights for future studies. However, this study had some limitations: (1) omission of social or health security factors: key determinants like health insurance coverage and healthcare infrastructure were not rigorously analyzed, limiting insights into systemic drivers of health disparities. (2) methodological constraints: the cross-sectional design precluded causal inference, while convenience sampling within a single region reduced generalizability. Additionally, the use of a self-administered questionnaire may have introduced response bias, potentially leading to inaccurate data. Misinterpretations of questions could further compromise the reliability of the findings. (3) incomplete health metrics: critical indicators (e.g., body weight, hygiene) were absent, potentially obscuring biopsychosocial pathways linking behaviors to quality of life. (4) age categorization granularity: broad age intervals may mask nuanced lifespan variations and restricts the ability to conduct more detailed age-specific analyses. Therefore, the conclusions of this study should be used with caution.

Conclusion

This study examined the relationship between health-related behaviors and QOL among Hakka older adults. Our findings showed that specific health-related behaviors were associated with QOL, with a higher number of healthy behaviors corresponding to a higher QOL score. Notably, compared with the moderate-health pattern, risk-selective pattern and family SES were positively related to QOL. And the family SES exclusively moderated the risk-selective pattern on QOL. These findings underscore the importance of promoting health-related behavior to enhance QOL in older adults, particularly when considering multiple health-related behaviors simultaneously. To support this, we recommend the following strategies: (1) developing community-based health promotion programs: implement targeted initiatives that encourage healthy behaviors among older adults, fostering a supportive environment for positive lifestyle changes; (2) conducting personalized health assessments: provide individualized health assessments to tailor interventions based on specific needs, thereby enhancing their effectiveness; (3) implementing education and awareness campaigns: increase public awareness about the impact of healthy lifestyles on QOL through structured educational initiatives; (4) integrating health services: expand health promotion efforts to include mental health support, such as stress management programs and coping strategies, ensuring a more comprehensive approach to well-being.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the Hakka older adults for their cooperation during the study and to the local residents who generously facilitated the research process.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of School of Health Science and Faculty of Medical Sciences, Wuhan University (IRB Number: 2019YF2050). Informed consent information was included with each paper questionnaire and introduced before the surveys. The participants were guaranteed no risk being involved in participating in the survey, and only those who agreed to participate were interviewed.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Not applicable.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc-nd/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Bijlagen

Appendix 1

WHOQOL-OLD
The final version of the WHOQOL-OLD module is presented in Table, which shows the six facets and their constituent items. The Cronbach alpha values show an acceptable range from 0.72 to 0.88 for each facet.
Dimension
No
Items
Sensory Abilities
1
Impairments to senses affect daily life
2
Rate sensory functioning
10
Loss of sensory abilities affect participation in activities
20
Problems with sensory functioning affect ability to interact
Autonomy
3
Freedom to make own decisions
4
Feel in control of your future
5
Able to do things you’d like to
11
People around you are respectful of your freedom
Past, Present and Future Activities
12
Happy with things to look forward to
13
Satisfied with opportunities to continue achieving
15
Received the recognition you deserve in life
19
Satisfied with what you’ve achieved in life
Social Participation
14
Satisfied with the way you use your time
16
Satisfied with level of activity
17
Have enough to do each day
18
Satisfied with opportunity to participate in community
Death and Dying
6
Concerned about the way you will die
7
Afraid of not being able to control death
8
Scared of dying
9
Fear pain before death
Intimacy
21
Feel a sense of companionship in life
22
Experience love in your life
23
Opportunities to love
24
Opportunities to be loved

Appendix 2

Family socioeconomic status was included in this study, and their assignment description.
Variables
Description of categorical variable assignment
Educational level
1 = illiterate; 2 = literacy class/home school; 3 = primary school; 4 = junior high school or above
AHI
1 = 15,000 or below; 2 = 15,001–30,000; 3 = 30,001–45,00; 4 = 45,001–60,000; 5 = 60,001 or above
Current residence
1 = Village; 2 = Town; 3 = County
Employment before retired
1 = Farming; 2 = Non-farming
Current employment
1 = Yes; 2 = No
Personal savings
1 = 10,000 or below; 2 = 10,001–30,000; 3 = 30,001–50,000; 4 = 50,001–7000; 5 = 70,001 or above
AHI average annual household incomes

Appendix 3

The weights of family SES indicators based on principal component analysis.
 
F1
F2
Score coefficient
Weight coefficient
Eigenvalues
3.471
1.098
\
\
Variance explanation rate
57.851
18.305
Educational level
0.421
0.275
0.390
0.209
AHI
0.432
− 0.007
0.339
0.182
Current residence
0.431
− 0.184
0.301
0.161
Employment before retired
0.460
0.011
0.365
0.196
Current employment
− 0.174
0.906
0.055
0.029
Personal savings
0.456
0.262
0.415
0.223
AHI average annual household incomes
Literatuur
8.
go back to reference Stokoe, M., Zwicker, H. M., Forbes, C., Abu-Saris, N., Fay-McClymont, T. B., Désiré, N., Guilcher, G. M. T., Singh, G., Leaker, M., Yeates, K. O., Russell, K. B., Cho, S., Carrels, T., Rahamatullah, I., Henry, B., Dunnewold, N., & Schulte, F. S. M. (2022). Health related quality of life in children with sickle cell disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Reviews, 56, 100982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.blre.2022.100982CrossRefPubMed Stokoe, M., Zwicker, H. M., Forbes, C., Abu-Saris, N., Fay-McClymont, T. B., Désiré, N., Guilcher, G. M. T., Singh, G., Leaker, M., Yeates, K. O., Russell, K. B., Cho, S., Carrels, T., Rahamatullah, I., Henry, B., Dunnewold, N., & Schulte, F. S. M. (2022). Health related quality of life in children with sickle cell disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Reviews, 56, 100982. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​blre.​2022.​100982CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Singh, R., Wilborn, D., Lintzeri, D. A., & Blume-Peytavi, U. (2023). Health-related quality of life (hrQoL) among patients with primary cicatricial alopecia (PCA): A systematic review. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 37(12), 2462–2473. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.19381CrossRefPubMed Singh, R., Wilborn, D., Lintzeri, D. A., & Blume-Peytavi, U. (2023). Health-related quality of life (hrQoL) among patients with primary cicatricial alopecia (PCA): A systematic review. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 37(12), 2462–2473. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jdv.​19381CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Addison, S., Shirima, D., Aboagye-Mensah, E. B., Dunovan, S. G., Pascal, E. Y., Lustberg, M. B., Arthur, E. K., & Nolan, T. S. (2022). Effects of tandem cognitive behavioral therapy and healthy lifestyle interventions on health-related outcomes in cancer survivors: A systematic review. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 16(5), 1023–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01094-8CrossRefPubMed Addison, S., Shirima, D., Aboagye-Mensah, E. B., Dunovan, S. G., Pascal, E. Y., Lustberg, M. B., Arthur, E. K., & Nolan, T. S. (2022). Effects of tandem cognitive behavioral therapy and healthy lifestyle interventions on health-related outcomes in cancer survivors: A systematic review. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 16(5), 1023–1046. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11764-021-01094-8CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Liang, W., Duan, Y., Wang, Y., Lippke, S., Shang, B., Lin, Z., Wulff, H., & Baker, J. S. (2022). Psychosocial mediators of web-based interventions for promoting a healthy lifestyle among Chinese college students: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(9), e37563. https://doi.org/10.2196/37563CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liang, W., Duan, Y., Wang, Y., Lippke, S., Shang, B., Lin, Z., Wulff, H., & Baker, J. S. (2022). Psychosocial mediators of web-based interventions for promoting a healthy lifestyle among Chinese college students: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(9), e37563. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2196/​37563CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Reina-Gutiérrez, S., Cavero-Redondo, I., Martínez-Vizcaíno, V., Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo, S., López-Muñoz, P., Álvarez-Bueno, C., Guzmán-Pavón, M. J., & Torres-Costoso, A. (2022). The type of exercise most beneficial for quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis: A network meta-analysis. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 65(3), 101578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101578CrossRefPubMed Reina-Gutiérrez, S., Cavero-Redondo, I., Martínez-Vizcaíno, V., Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo, S., López-Muñoz, P., Álvarez-Bueno, C., Guzmán-Pavón, M. J., & Torres-Costoso, A. (2022). The type of exercise most beneficial for quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis: A network meta-analysis. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 65(3), 101578. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​rehab.​2021.​101578CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
31.
37.
go back to reference Campbell, E. B., Delgadillo, M., Lazzeroni, L. C., Louras, P. N., Myers, J., Yesavage, J., & Fairchild, J. K. (2023). Cognitive improvement following physical exercise and cognitive training intervention for older adults with MCI. Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 78(3), 554–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glac189CrossRefPubMed Campbell, E. B., Delgadillo, M., Lazzeroni, L. C., Louras, P. N., Myers, J., Yesavage, J., & Fairchild, J. K. (2023). Cognitive improvement following physical exercise and cognitive training intervention for older adults with MCI. Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 78(3), 554–560. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​gerona/​glac189CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Agarwal, K., Luk, J. W., Manza, P., McDuffie, C., To, L., Jaime-Lara, R. B., Stangl, B. L., Schwandt, M. L., Momenan, R., Goldman, D., Diazgranados, N., Ramchandani, V. A., & Joseph, P. V. (2023). Chemosensory alterations and impact on quality of life in persistent alcohol drinkers. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 58(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agac047CrossRefPubMed Agarwal, K., Luk, J. W., Manza, P., McDuffie, C., To, L., Jaime-Lara, R. B., Stangl, B. L., Schwandt, M. L., Momenan, R., Goldman, D., Diazgranados, N., Ramchandani, V. A., & Joseph, P. V. (2023). Chemosensory alterations and impact on quality of life in persistent alcohol drinkers. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 58(1), 84–92. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​alcalc/​agac047CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Trichia, E., Alegre-Díaz, J., Aguilar-Ramirez, D., Ramirez-Reyes, R., Garcilazo-Ávila, A., González-Carballo, C., Bragg, F., Friedrichs, L. G., Herrington, W. G., Holland, L., Torres, J., Wade, R., Collins, R., Peto, R., Berumen, J., Tapia-Conyer, R., Kuri-Morales, P., & Emberson, J. R. (2024). Alcohol and mortality in Mexico: Prospective study of 150 000 adults. The Lancet Public Health, 9(11), e907–e915. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00228-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Trichia, E., Alegre-Díaz, J., Aguilar-Ramirez, D., Ramirez-Reyes, R., Garcilazo-Ávila, A., González-Carballo, C., Bragg, F., Friedrichs, L. G., Herrington, W. G., Holland, L., Torres, J., Wade, R., Collins, R., Peto, R., Berumen, J., Tapia-Conyer, R., Kuri-Morales, P., & Emberson, J. R. (2024). Alcohol and mortality in Mexico: Prospective study of 150 000 adults. The Lancet Public Health, 9(11), e907–e915. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S2468-2667(24)00228-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
65.
go back to reference Andrew, A., Attanasio, O., Augsburg, B., Behrman, J., Day, M., Jervis, P., Meghir, C., & Phimister, A. (2024). Mothers’ social networks and socioeconomic gradients of isolation. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 73(1), 487–522. https://doi.org/10.1086/727807CrossRef Andrew, A., Attanasio, O., Augsburg, B., Behrman, J., Day, M., Jervis, P., Meghir, C., & Phimister, A. (2024). Mothers’ social networks and socioeconomic gradients of isolation. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 73(1), 487–522. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1086/​727807CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Hildebrand, J., Maycock, B., Burns, S., Zhao, Y., Allsop, S., Howat, P., & Lobo, R. (2013). Design of an instrument to measure alcohol-related psychosocial influences in the development of norms among 13-year-old to 17-year-old adolescents. British Medical Journal Open, 3(8), e003571. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003571CrossRef Hildebrand, J., Maycock, B., Burns, S., Zhao, Y., Allsop, S., Howat, P., & Lobo, R. (2013). Design of an instrument to measure alcohol-related psychosocial influences in the development of norms among 13-year-old to 17-year-old adolescents. British Medical Journal Open, 3(8), e003571. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmjopen-2013-003571CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Brennan, S., Stanford, T., Wluka, A., Page, R., Graves, S., Kotowicz, M., Nicholson, G., & Pasco, J. (2012). Utilisation of primary total knee joint replacements across socioeconomic status in the Barwon Statistical Division, Australia, 2006–2007: A cross-sectional study. British Medical Journal Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001310CrossRef Brennan, S., Stanford, T., Wluka, A., Page, R., Graves, S., Kotowicz, M., Nicholson, G., & Pasco, J. (2012). Utilisation of primary total knee joint replacements across socioeconomic status in the Barwon Statistical Division, Australia, 2006–2007: A cross-sectional study. British Medical Journal Open. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmjopen-2012-001310CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The moderating effect of family socioeconomic status in the relationship between health-related behaviors and quality of life among the Hakka older adults in Fujian, China
Auteurs
Rongrong Liu
Jinghong Huang
Longhua Cai
Wenji Qiu
Xiaojun Liu
Publicatiedatum
16-04-2025
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-03973-4