Top

22-01-2025 | Empirical Research

The Longitudinal Relationship between Adolescents’ Prosocial Behavior and Well-Being: A Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analysis

Auteurs: Enxia Ju, Huaiyuan Qi, Linyao Zhao, Yangmei Luo, Ying Li, Xuqun You

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Despite extensive research on the relationship between adolescents’ prosocial behavior and well-being, few studies have examined the relationships between prosocial acts towards different targets (family, friends, and strangers) and both hedonic and eudaimonic well-being over time, especially within the cultural context of China, where relational closeness are highly emphasized. To address this research gap, the present study conducted a longitudinal investigation involving 514 Chinese adolescents (M = 13.75 years, SD = 1.46; 57.2% female) across three time points, each separated by six-month intervals. Cross-lagged panel network analyses revealed the reciprocal relationships between prosocial behavior and well-being, moderated by the relational closeness to the prosocial target. Specifically, the results showed a positive and reciprocal relationships between helping family members and both forms of well-being, as well as between helping friends and eudaimonic well-being. In contrast, while helping strangers did not exhibit a direct reciprocal relationship with well-being, both hedonic and eudaimonic well-being were predictive of prosocial behavior towards strangers. Furthermore, the mediation path analysis elucidated distinct mechanisms: helping family and strangers satisfied autonomy needs, contributing to well-being, whereas helping friends fulfilled relational needs. These findings highlight the mutual interplay between adolescents’ prosocial behavior, particularly towards close relations, and their well-being.

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., Kemeza, I., Nyende, P., Ashton-James, C. E., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031578.CrossRefPubMed

Aknin, L. B., Van De Vondervoort, J. W., & Hamlin, J. K. (2018). Positive feelings reward and promote prosocial behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.017.CrossRefPubMed

Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458. https://doi.org/10.1086/261662.CrossRef

Boenigk, S., & Mayr, M. L. (2016). The happiness of giving: Evidence from the German socioeconomic panel that happier people are more generous. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(5), 1825–1846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9672-2.CrossRef

Braams, B. R., & Crone, E. A. (2017). Peers and parents: A comparison between neural activation when winning for friends and mothers in adolescence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(3), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw136.CrossRefPubMed

Breslin, G., Nevill, A. M., Donnelly, P., & Murphy, M. H. (2013). Socio-demographic and behavioural differences and associations with happiness for those who are in good and poor health. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(2), 142–154.CrossRef

Carlo, G., & Padilla-Walker, L. (2020). Adolescents’ prosocial behaviors through a multidimensional and multicultural lens. Child Development Perspectives, 14(4), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12391.CrossRef

Carlson, M., Charlin, V., & Miller, N. (1988). Positive mood and helping behavior: A test of six hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.211.CrossRefPubMed

Chen, F. F., & West, S. G. (2008). Measuring individualism and collectivism: The importance of considering differential components, reference groups, and measurement invariance. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(2), 259–294.CrossRef

Curry, O. S., Rowland, L. A., Van Lissa, C. J., Zlotowitz, S., McAlaney, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2018). Happy to help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.014.CrossRef

Dakin, B. C., Tan, N. P., Conner, T. S., & Bastian, B. (2022). The relationship between prosociality, meaning, and happiness in everyday life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(6), 2787–2804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00526-1.CrossRef

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.CrossRef

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.CrossRefPubMed

Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. NY: Guilford Press.

Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., & Fried, E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1.CrossRefPubMed

Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D., & Borsboom, D. (2012). Qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i04

Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2018). Feel good, do good online? Spillover and crossover effects of happiness on adolescents’ online prosocial behavior. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20, 1241–1258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0003-2.CrossRef

Fei, X. (1947/1992). From the soil: The foundation of Chinese society. University of California Press.

Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Funkhouser, C. J., Chacko, A. A., Correa, K. A., Kaiser, A. J. E., & Shankman, S. A. (2021). Unique longitudinal relationships between symptoms of psychopathology in youth: A cross‐lagged panel network analysis in the ABCD Study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13256.CrossRefPubMed

Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025007614869.CrossRef

Gregori, F., López‐Pérez, B., Manfredi, L., Eisenberg, N., Lundie, D., Lee, S., Gerbino, M., Pastorelli, C., & Zuffianò, A. (2024). The relations among prosocial behavior, hedonic, and eudaimonic well‐being in everyday life. Journal of Personality, jopy.12937. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12937

Hui, B. P. H. (2022). Prosocial behavior and well-being: Shifting from the ‘chicken and egg’ to positive feedback loop. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.017.CrossRefPubMed

Hui, B. P. H., & Kogan, A. (2018). Daily ups and downs: An event-sampling study of the mediated moderation of prosocial engagement on well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(6), 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617722197.CrossRef

Hui, B. P. H., Ng, J. C. K., Berzaghi, E., Cunningham-Amos, L. A., & Kogan, A. (2020). Rewards of Kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 146(12), 1084–1116. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000298.CrossRefPubMed

Hwang, K. (2000). Chinese relationalism: Theoretical construction and methodological considerations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00124.CrossRef

Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420.CrossRef

Jia, J., Tong, W., Wang, X., & Fang, X. (2024). The comorbidity mechanism of problematic internet use and depression among Chinese college students: A cross-lagged panel network analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 156, 108057 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108057.CrossRefPubMed

Jones, P. J., Mair, P., & McNally, R. J. (2018). Visualizing psychological networks: A tutorial in R. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1742.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Li, Y., Kang, Y., Zhu, L., Yuan, M., Li, Y., Xu, B., Zhang, X., Wang, G., & Su, P. (2023). Longitudinal correlates of bullying victimization among Chinese early adolescents: A cross-lagged panel network analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 339, 203–210.CrossRefPubMed

Liu, J., Lin, L., Lv, Y., Wei, C., Zhou, Y., & Chen, X. (2013). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Basic Psychological Needs Scale. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 27(10), 791–795.

Lu, C., Liang, L., Chen, W., & Bian, Y. (2021). Do gifts of roses have a lingering fragrance? Evidence from altruistic interventions into adolescents’ subjective well-being. Journal of Adolescence, 86, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.11.007.CrossRefPubMed

Luo, Y., Qi, S., Chen, X., You, X., Huang, X., & Yang, Z. (2017). Pleasure attainment or self-realization: The balance between two forms of well-beings are encoded in default mode network. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(10), 1678–1686. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx078.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). The benefits of benevolence: Basic psychological needs, beneficence, and the enhancement of well-being. Journal of Personality, 84(6), 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12215.CrossRefPubMed

Newsom, J. T. (2015). Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling: A Comprehensive Introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRef

Padilla-Walker, L. M., Carlo, G., & Memmott-Elison, M. K. (2018). Longitudinal change in adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 28(3), 698–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12362.CrossRefPubMed

Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365–392. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141.CrossRefPubMed

Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association/Oxford University Press.

Qiu, L., Zheng, X., & Yanfei, W. (2008). Revision of the positive affect and negative affect scale. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 14(3), 249–254.

Qu, D., Liu, B., Jia, L., Zhang, X., Chen, D., Zhang, Q., Feng, Y., & Chen, R. (2024). The longitudinal relationships between short video addiction and depressive symptoms: A cross-lagged panel network analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 152, 108059 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108059.CrossRef

Qu, G., Ju, E., Qin, G., Chen, X., & Luo, Y. (2023). Profiles of volunteers’ motivations and positive experiences relate to their sustained volunteering during the 19 pandemic. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), e2748 https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2748.CrossRef

Robinaugh, D. J., Millner, A. J., & McNally, R. J. (2016). Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(6), 747–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000181.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.CrossRefPubMed

Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719.CrossRefPubMed

Schwartz, C. E., Keyl, P. M., Marcum, J. P., & Bode, R. (2009). Helping others shows differential benefits on health and well-being for male and female teens. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9098-1.CrossRef

Selig, J. P., & Little, T. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265–278). The Guilford Press.

Snippe, E., Jeronimus, B. F., Aan Het Rot, M., Bos, E. H., De Jonge, P., & Wichers, M. (2018). The reciprocity of prosocial behavior and positive affect in daily life. Journal of Personality, 86(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12299.CrossRefPubMed

Son, J., & Wilson, J. (2012). Volunteer work and hedonic, eudemonic, and social well‐being. Sociological Forum, 27(3), 658–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2012.01340.x.CrossRef

Tashjian, S. M., Rahal, D., Karan, M., Eisenberger, N., Galván, A., Cole, S. W., & Fuligni, A. J. (2021). Evidence from a randomized controlled trial that altruism moderates the effect of prosocial acts on adolescent well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01362-3.CrossRefPubMed

Van der Graaff, J., Carlo, G., Crocetti, E., Koot, H., & Branje, S. (2018). Prosocial behavior in adolescence: gender differences in development and links with empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 1086–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1.CrossRefPubMed

Vélez-Agosto, N. M., Soto-Crespo, J. G., Vizcarrondo-Oppenheimer, M., Vega-Molina, S., & García Coll, C. (2017). Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory revision: Moving culture from the macro into the micro. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 900–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617704397.CrossRefPubMed

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefPubMed

Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984.CrossRefPubMed

Xiong, Y., Chen, J., Yang, L., Guo, X., & Ren, P. (2023). Does being prosocial pay off? Testing positive developmental cascades of prosocial behavior, social preference, and subjective well-being in Chinese adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(9), 1983–1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01809-3.CrossRefPubMed

Yang, Z., Fu, X., Yu, X., & Lv, Y. (2018). Longitudinal relations between adolescents’ materialism and prosocial behavior toward family, friends, and strangers. Journal of Adolescence, 62, 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.11.013.CrossRefPubMed

Zhang, Z., Lv, J., Jiang, T., Chen, X., & Luo, Y. (2024). Motivation matters: Autonomous motivation sustains the happiness from prosocial behavior. Motivation Science, 10(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000319.CrossRef

Titel: The Longitudinal Relationship between Adolescents’ Prosocial Behavior and Well-Being: A Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analysis
Auteurs: Enxia Ju
Huaiyuan Qi
Linyao Zhao
Yangmei Luo
Ying Li
Xuqun You
Publicatiedatum: 22-01-2025
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02137-4

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

The Longitudinal Relationship between Adolescents’ Prosocial Behavior and Well-Being: A Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analysis

Abstract

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen