Skip to main content

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Erasmus MC heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van Erasmus MC, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van Erasmus MC.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Top

Open Access 10-12-2024 | Research

Self-Rated Symptoms of Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in a Clinical Sample of Adolescents

Auteurs: Simon Klos, Ann-Kathrin Thöne, Manfred Döpfner, Anja Görtz-Dorten

Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

This study examined the psychometric properties of self-rated symptoms of oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder (CD). We analyzed symptom ratings from a clinical outpatient sample of 658 adolescents aged 11;0–17;11 years diagnosed with ODD/CD and/or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. In two steps, we examined the factor structure of ODD models and an additional CD symptom dimension using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). Our preferred three-factor CFA and ESEM models (CFI = 0.937–0.975, TLI = 0.926–0.962, RMSEA = 0.049–0.068, SRMR = 0.045–0.070) demonstrated scalar measurement invariance across age groups (≥ 14;0 years) and metric measurement invariance across informants (parents, teachers). With exceptions, the self-rated symptom scales showed acceptable internal consistencies (α = 0.68–0.84). Convergent (r =.27–.65) and divergent validity (r =.13–.41) were supported using Achenbach’s Youth Self Report Form. Our results provide implications for using self-rated ODD/CD symptoms in clinical practice and research.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
Detailed instructions can be found on the IBM SPSS STATISTICS support homepage (https://​www.​ibm.​com/​support/​pages/​testing-differences-between-dependent-correlations).
 
Literatuur
4.
go back to reference de Los Reyes A, Epkins CC, Asmundson GJG et al (2023) Editorial Statement about JCCAP’s 2023 special issue on informant discrepancies in Youth Mental Health assessments: observations, guidelines, and future directions grounded in 60 years of Research. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 52:147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2022.2158842CrossRef de Los Reyes A, Epkins CC, Asmundson GJG et al (2023) Editorial Statement about JCCAP’s 2023 special issue on informant discrepancies in Youth Mental Health assessments: observations, guidelines, and future directions grounded in 60 years of Research. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 52:147–158. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​15374416.​2022.​2158842CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Matthys W, Powell NP (2018) Problem-solving structure of Assessment. In: Lochman JE, Matthys W (eds) The Wiley Handbook of Disruptive and Impulse-Control disorders, 1st edn. Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, pp 373–389 Matthys W, Powell NP (2018) Problem-solving structure of Assessment. In: Lochman JE, Matthys W (eds) The Wiley Handbook of Disruptive and Impulse-Control disorders, 1st edn. Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, pp 373–389
7.
go back to reference Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2001) Manual for the ASEBA School-Age forms & profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families, Burlington, VT Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2001) Manual for the ASEBA School-Age forms & profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families, Burlington, VT
8.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical Manual of Mental disorders. American Psychiatric Association American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical Manual of Mental disorders. American Psychiatric Association
9.
go back to reference World Health Organization (2015) ‎International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision, Fifth edition, 2016. World Health Organization World Health Organization (2015) ‎International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision, Fifth edition, 2016. World Health Organization
20.
37.
go back to reference Burke JD, Derella OJ, Johnsten OG (2018) Diagnostic issues in Oppositional defiant disorder. In: Lochman JE, Matthys W (eds) The Wiley Handbook of Disruptive and Impulse-Control disorders, 1st edn. Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, pp 21–36 Burke JD, Derella OJ, Johnsten OG (2018) Diagnostic issues in Oppositional defiant disorder. In: Lochman JE, Matthys W (eds) The Wiley Handbook of Disruptive and Impulse-Control disorders, 1st edn. Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, pp 21–36
39.
go back to reference World Health Organization (2020) International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 11th edn. World Health Organization World Health Organization (2020) International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 11th edn. World Health Organization
47.
go back to reference Döpfner M, Görtz-Dorten A, Lehmkuhl G (2008) Diagnostik-System für psychische Störungen Nach ICD-10 und DSM-IV für Kinder Und Jugendliche-II [Diagnostic System of Mental disorders in children and adolescents based on the ICD-10 and DSM-IV] (DISYPS-II). Hogrefe, Bern Döpfner M, Görtz-Dorten A, Lehmkuhl G (2008) Diagnostik-System für psychische Störungen Nach ICD-10 und DSM-IV für Kinder Und Jugendliche-II [Diagnostic System of Mental disorders in children and adolescents based on the ICD-10 and DSM-IV] (DISYPS-II). Hogrefe, Bern
48.
go back to reference Döpfner M, Görtz-Dorten A (2017) Diagnostik-System für psychische Störungen Nach ICD-10 und DSM-5 für Kinder Und Jugendliche-III [Diagnostic System of Mental disorders in children and adolescents based on the ICD-10 and DSM-5] (DISYPS–III). Hogrefe, Bern Döpfner M, Görtz-Dorten A (2017) Diagnostik-System für psychische Störungen Nach ICD-10 und DSM-5 für Kinder Und Jugendliche-III [Diagnostic System of Mental disorders in children and adolescents based on the ICD-10 and DSM-5] (DISYPS–III). Hogrefe, Bern
49.
go back to reference Döpfner M, Plück J, Kinnen C et al (2014) Manual deutsche Schulalter-Formen Der Child Behavior Checklist Von Thomas M. Achenbach. Elternfragebogen über das Verhalten Von Kindern Und Jugendlichen (CBCL/6-18R), Lehrerfragebogen über das Verhalten Von Kindern Und Jugendlichen (TRF/6-18R), Fragebogen für Jugendliche (YSR/11-18R) [Manual of the German versions of the child Behavior Checklist for school-aged children and adolescents by. In: Thomas M (ed) Achenbach. Child Behavior Checklist, vol CBCL/6–18R. Hogrefe, Bern. Teacher Report Form (TRF/6-18R), Youth Self Report (YSR/11-18R)] Döpfner M, Plück J, Kinnen C et al (2014) Manual deutsche Schulalter-Formen Der Child Behavior Checklist Von Thomas M. Achenbach. Elternfragebogen über das Verhalten Von Kindern Und Jugendlichen (CBCL/6-18R), Lehrerfragebogen über das Verhalten Von Kindern Und Jugendlichen (TRF/6-18R), Fragebogen für Jugendliche (YSR/11-18R) [Manual of the German versions of the child Behavior Checklist for school-aged children and adolescents by. In: Thomas M (ed) Achenbach. Child Behavior Checklist, vol CBCL/6–18R. Hogrefe, Bern. Teacher Report Form (TRF/6-18R), Youth Self Report (YSR/11-18R)]
50.
go back to reference Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2017) Mplus user’s guide, 8th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2017) Mplus user’s guide, 8th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles
51.
go back to reference IBM Corp (2020) IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY IBM Corp (2020) IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY
52.
go back to reference Kline RB (2016) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Methodology in the Social Sciences. Guilford Press, New York, London Kline RB (2016) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Methodology in the Social Sciences. Guilford Press, New York, London
54.
go back to reference Brown TA (2015) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, Second edition. Methodology in the Social Sciences. The Guilford Press, New York, London Brown TA (2015) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, Second edition. Methodology in the Social Sciences. The Guilford Press, New York, London
56.
go back to reference Raftery AE (1995) Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research. Sociological Methodology:111–163 Raftery AE (1995) Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research. Sociological Methodology:111–163
57.
go back to reference Morin AJS, Myers ND, Lee S (2020) Modern Factor Analytic Techniques. Bifactor Models, Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) and Bifactor-ESEM. In: Tenenbaum G, Eklund RC (eds) Handbook of Sport Psychology. Fourth Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp 1044–1073 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119568124.ch51 Morin AJS, Myers ND, Lee S (2020) Modern Factor Analytic Techniques. Bifactor Models, Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) and Bifactor-ESEM. In: Tenenbaum G, Eklund RC (eds) Handbook of Sport Psychology. Fourth Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp 1044–1073 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​9781119568124.​ch51
64.
go back to reference Field A (2018) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS statistics, 5th edition. SAGE edge. SAGE, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne Field A (2018) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS statistics, 5th edition. SAGE edge. SAGE, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne
Metagegevens
Titel
Self-Rated Symptoms of Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in a Clinical Sample of Adolescents
Auteurs
Simon Klos
Ann-Kathrin Thöne
Manfred Döpfner
Anja Görtz-Dorten
Publicatiedatum
10-12-2024
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Print ISSN: 0009-398X
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-024-01802-2