Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Ga naar:
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
BSL Shop
Inloggen

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Erasmus MC heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

» Andere revante producten voor Erasmus MC studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van Erasmus MC, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van Erasmus MC.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Gepubliceerd in:

01-12-2013

Psychometric Analysis of the Behavior Problems Inventory Using an Item-Response Theory Framework: A Sample of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities

Auteurs: Lucy Barnard-Brak, Johannes Rojahn, Tianlan Wei

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 4/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

The current study used an item response theory (IRT) framework to examine the psychometric properties of the long and short forms of the Behavior Problems Inventory (BPI-01 and BPI-S respectively). The BPI measures self-injurious, aggressive/destructive, and stereotyped behaviors as manifested among individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. With a sample of 1,122 individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, it is the first IRT examination of either form of the BPI. Results reveal acceptable psychometric properties for each form of the BPI as well as minimal differential item functioning according to sex.
vorige artikel Italian Version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II): Dimensionality, Reliability, Convergent and Criterion Validity
volgende artikel Behavioral and Psychophysiological Responsiveness During Child Feeding in Mothers with Histories of Eating Disorders: A Pilot Study
Literatuur
Ackerman, T. (1992). A didactic explanation of item bias, item impact, and item validity from a multidimensional perspective. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 674–691.CrossRef
Aman, M. G., Singh, N. N., Stewart, A. W., & Field, C. J. (1985a). The Aberrant Behavior Checklist: a behavior rating scale for the assessment of treatment effects. American Journal on Mental Deficiency, 89, 485–491.
Aman, M. G., Singh, N. N., Stewart, A. W., & Field, C. J. (1985b). Psychometric characteristics of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist. American Journal on Mental Deficiency, 89, 492–502.
Aman, M. G., Burrow, W., & Wolford, P. L. (1995). The Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community: factor validity and effect of subject variables for adults in group homes. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 283–292.PubMed
Aman, M. G., Tassé, M. J., Rojahn, J., & Hammer, D. (1996). The Nisonger CBRF: a child behavior rating form for children with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 17, 41–57.PubMedCrossRef
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
Baer, R. A., Samuel, D. B., & Lykins, E. L. B. (2011). Differential item functioning on the five facet mindfulness questionnaire is minimal in demographically matched meditators and nonmeditators. Assessment, 18(1), 3–10.PubMedCrossRef
Baker, F. B. (1985). The basics of item response theory. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory. College Park: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, University of Maryland.
Bodfish, J. W., Symons, F. J., & Lewis, M. H. (1999). Repetitive behavior scales. Western Carolina Center Research Reports.
Cai, L. (2008). SEM of another flavor: two new applications of the supplemented EM algorithm. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 309–329.PubMedCrossRef
Cho, Y. I., Martin, M. J., Conger, R. D., & Widaman, K. F. (2010). Differential item functioning on antisocial behavior scale items for adolescents and young adults from single-parent and two-parent families. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 157–168.PubMedCrossRef
Cooper, S. A., Smiley, E., Jackson, A., Finlayson, J., Allan, L., Mantry, D., et al. (2009). Adults with intellectual disabilities: prevalence, incidence, and remission of aggressive behavior and related factors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(3), 217–232.PubMedCrossRef
Crocker, A. G., Mercier, C., Lachapelle, Y., Brunet, A., Morin, D., & Roy, M. E. (2006). Prevalence and types of aggressive behavior among adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50(9), 652–661.PubMedCrossRef
Deb, S., Thomas, M., & Bright, C. (2001). Mental disorder in adults with intellectual disability: the rate of behaviour disorders among a community-based population aged between 16 and 64 years. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45(6), 506–514.PubMedCrossRef
DeMars, C. E., & Lau, A. (2011). Differential item functioning detection with latent classes: how accurately can we detect who is responding differentially? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(4), 597–616.CrossRef
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39(1), 1–38.
Ebesutani, C., Regan, J., Smith, A., Reise, S., Higa-McMillan, C., & Chorpita, B. F. (2012). The 10-item positive and negative affect schedule for children, child and parent shortened versions: application of Item Response Theory for more efficient assessment. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34, 191–203.CrossRef
Einfeld, S., & Tonge, B. J. (2002). Manual for the Developmental Behaviour Checklist: Primary carer version (DBC-P) and teacher version (DBC-T) (2nd ed.). Clayton: University of New South Wales and Monash University Centre for Developmental Psychiatry and Psychology.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Emerson, E., Kiernan, C., Alborz, A., Reeves, D., Mason, H., Swarbrick, R., et al. (2001). The prevalence of challenging behaviors: a total population study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22(1), 77–93.PubMedCrossRef
Farmer, C. A., & Aman, M. G. (2009). Psychometric properties of the Children’s Scale of Hostility and Aggression: Reactive/Proactive (C-SHARP). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 270–280.PubMedCrossRef
González, M. L., Dixon, D. R., Rojahn, J., Esbensen, A. J., Matson, J. L., Terlonge, C., et al. (2009). The Behavior Problems Inventory: reliability and factor validity in institutionalized adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22, 223–235.CrossRef
Harris, P. (1993). The nature and extent of aggressive behaviour amongst people with learning difficulties (mental handicap) in a single health district. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 37, 221–242.PubMedCrossRef
Hastings, R. P., Beck, A. & Hill, C. (2005). Positive contributions made by children with a learning disability in the family mothers’ and fathers’ perceptions. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 155–65.
Hattier, M. A., Matson, J. L., Tureck, K., & Horovitz, M. (2011). The effects of gender and age on repetitive and/or restricted behaviors and interests in adults with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2346–2351.PubMedCrossRef
Hattier, M. A., Matson, J. L., Belva, B., & Kozlowski, A. (2012). The effects of diagnostic group and gender on challenging behaviors in infants and toddlers with cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, or seizures. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 258–264.PubMedCrossRef
IRTPRO (Version 2.1) [Computer Software]. Skokie: Scientific Software International, Inc.
Kanne, S. M., & Mazurek, M. O. (2011). Aggression in children and adolescents with ASD: prevalence and risk factors. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(7), 926–937.PubMedCrossRef
Kozlowski, A. M., & Matson, J. L. (2012). An examination of challenging behaviors in autistic disorder versus pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified: significant differences and gender effects. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 319–325.CrossRef
Langer, M. M. (2008). A reexamination of Lord’s Wald test for differential item functioning using item response theory and modern error estimation (Doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Leekam, S., Tandos, J., McConachie, H., Meins, E., Parkinson, K., Wright, C., et al. (2007). Repetitive behaviors in typically developing 2-year-olds. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 1131–1138.PubMedCrossRef
Lord, F. M. (1977). A study of item bias using item characteristic curve theory. In Y. H. Poortinga (Ed.), Basic problems in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 19–29). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Matlock, S. T., & Aman, M. G. (2011). Development of the Adult Scale of Hostility and Aggression: Reactive/Proactive (A-SHARP). American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 116, 130–141.CrossRef
Matson, J. L., & Turygin, N. C. (2012). How do researchers define self-injurious behavior? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 1021–1026.PubMedCrossRef
McClintock, K., Hall, S., & Oliver, C. (2003). Risk markers associated with challenging behaviours in people with intellectual disabilities: a meta-analytic study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 405–416.PubMedCrossRef
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting statistical equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82.PubMedCrossRef
Meng, X. L., & Rubin, D. B. (1991). Using EM to obtain asymptotic variance-covariance matrices: the SEM algorithm. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 899–909.CrossRef
Mircea, C. E., Rojahn, J., & Esbensen, A. J. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of Romanian translations of the Behavior Problems Inventory-01 and the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 3, 51–65.CrossRef
Moss, J., Oliver, C., Arron, K., Burbidge, C., & Berg, K. (2009). The prevalence and phenomenology of repetitive behavior in genetic syndromes. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(4), 572–588.PubMedCrossRef
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Nugent, W. R. (2003). A psychometric study of the multi-problem screening inventory depression subscale using item response and generalizability theories. Research on Social Work Practice, 13(1), 65–79.CrossRef
Owen, D. M., Hastings, R. P., Noone, S. J., Chinn, J., Harman, K., Roberts, J., et al. (2004). Life events as correlates of problem behavior and mental health in a residential population of adults with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25, 309–20.
Penfield, R. D., & Algina, J. (2006). A generalized DIF effect variance estimator for measuring unsigned differential test functioning in mixed format tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43(4), 295–312.CrossRef
Peters-Scheffer, N., Didden, R., Green, V. A., Sigafoos, J., Korzilius, H., Pituch, K., et al. (2008). The Behavior Flexibility Rating Scale-Revised (BFRS-R): factor analysis, internal consistency, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, and convergent validity. Research in Developmental Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 29(5), 398–407.CrossRef
Reise, S. P., & Yu, J. (1990). Parameter recovery in the graded response model using MULTILOG. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 133–144.CrossRef
Rojahn, J., & Meier, L. J. (2010). Psychopathology in intellectual disabilities: Epidemiology and assessment. In R. M. Hodapp (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (app, Vol. 38, pp. 239–287). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Rojahn, J., Matson, J. L., Lott, D., Esbensen, A. J., & Smalls, Y. (2001). The Behavior Problems Inventory: an instrument for the assessment of self-injury, stereotyped behavior and aggression/destruction in individuals with developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 577–588.PubMedCrossRef
Rojahn, J., Matson, J. L., Naglieri, J. A., & Mayville, E. (2004). Relationships between psychiatric conditions and behavior problems among adults with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 109, 21–33.PubMedCrossRef
Rojahn, J., Rowe, E. W., Macken, J., Gray, A., Delitta, D., Booth, A., et al. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of the Behavior Problems Inventory-01 and the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form with children and adolescents. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 3, 28–50.CrossRef
Rojahn, J., Rowe, E. W., Kasdan, S., Moore, L., & van Ingen, D. J. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist, the Anxiety, Depression and Mood Scale, the Assessment of Dual Diagnosis and the Social Performance Survey Schedule in adults with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2309–2320.PubMedCrossRef
Rojahn, J., Rowe, E. W., Sharber, A. C., Hastings, R. P., Matson, J. L., Didden, R., et al. (2012a). The Behavior Problems Inventory-Short Form (BPI-S) for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities I: development and provisional clinical reference data. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 527–545.PubMedCrossRef
Rojahn, J., Rowe, E. W., Sharber, A. C., Hastings, R. P., Matson, J. L., Didden, R., et al. (2012b). The Behavior Problems Inventory-Short Form (BPI-S) for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities II: reliability and validity. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 546–565.PubMedCrossRef
Samejima, F. (1969). Calibration of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 19, 86–100.
Schalock, R. L., Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Bradley, V. J., Buntinx, W. H. E., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M., et al. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (11th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Segal, D. L., Coolidge, F. L., & Rosowsky, E. (2006). Personality disorders and older adults. Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. Hoboken: Wiley.
Sipes, M., Matson, J. L., Worley, J. A., & Kozlowski, A. M. (2011). Gender differences in symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 1465–1470.CrossRef
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.CrossRef
Teresi, J. A. (2001). Statistical methods for examination of differential item functioning (DIF) with applications to cross-cultural measurement of functional, physical and mental health. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 7(1), 31–40.
Teresi, J. A. (2006). Different approaches to differential item functioning in health applications: advantages, disadvantages and some neglected topics. Medical Care, 44(11), 152–170.CrossRef
Thomas, M. L. (2011). The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: a review. Assessment, 18(3), 291–307.PubMedCrossRef
Tyrer, F., McGrother, C. W., Thorp, C. F., Donaldson, M., Bhaumik, S., Watson, J. M., et al. (2006). Physical aggression towards others in adults with learning disabilities: prevalence and associated factors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 295–304.PubMedCrossRef
Van den Broeck, J., Rossi, G., Dierckx, E., & De Clercq, B. (2012). Age-neutrality of the NEO-PI-R: potential differential item functioning in older versus younger adults. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34(3), 361–369.
Ware, J. E. (2003). Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: comments on an evolving field. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(4), 43–51.CrossRef
Winterstein, B. P., Ackerman, T. A., Silvia, P. J., & Kwapil, T. R. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales in an undergraduate sample: classical test theory, item response theory, and differential item functioning. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 33, 480–490.CrossRef
Woods, C.M., Cai, L., & Wang, M. (2012). The Langer-improved Wald test for DIF testing with multiple groups: evaluation and comparison to two-group IRT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(3), 532–547.
Zaja, R. H., Moore, L., van Ingen, D. J., & Rojahn, J. (2011). Psychometric comparison of the functional assessment instruments QABF, FACT, and FAST for self-injurious, stereotypic and aggressive/destructive behavior. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 24, 18–28.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Psychometric Analysis of the Behavior Problems Inventory Using an Item-Response Theory Framework: A Sample of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities
Auteurs
Lucy Barnard-Brak
Johannes Rojahn
Tianlan Wei
Publicatiedatum
01-12-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9356-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2013

Screening for Dissociative Disorders in Psychiatric Out- and Day Care-Patients

A Pilot Trial of Supporting teens’ Academic Needs Daily (STAND): A Parent-Adolescent Collaborative Intervention for ADHD

Delivery of Evidence-Based Psychotherapy via Video Telehealth

Relation Between Treatment Satisfaction and Treatment Outcome in Veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Italian Version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II): Dimensionality, Reliability, Convergent and Criterion Validity

From Dispositional Traits to Psychopathological Symptoms: Social-Cognitive Vulnerabilities as Intervening Mechanisms