Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-04-2025 | Research

Processing of onomatopoeia by hearing-reduced students in sentence context: a study based on ERPs

Auteurs: Jinhe Han, Shuhua Su, Qiaoyun Liu

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2025

Abstract

Onomatopoeia plays a crucial role in the early language development of individuals, serving as one of the primary language symbols acquired at an early stage. It functions as a bridge, connecting external sounds with the language system. In this study, event-related potential technology was employed alongside a lexical decision task within sentence structures, introducing phonological and orthographic variables. The main objective was to explore the impact of sentence context on onomatopoeia processing among hearing-reduced (HR) students. The results showed that the accuracy of HR students was significantly lower than typical-hearing (TH) students. With sentence context, the P200 response to phonological similarity was significantly larger than the response to orthographic similarity in HR students, and the P200 response to orthographic similarity under sentence context conditions was smaller in HR students than in TH students. Compared to TH students, graphical similarity evoked a higher P200 in HR students. Moreover, the N400 in the contextless condition was lower than in the contextual condition in TH students. The findings revealed that sentence context can have an impact on the acquisition of meaning for onomatopoeic words, as well as the processing of their phonology and orthography, but the effect on HR students and TH students was different.

vorige artikel Musicianship modulates octave illusion perception differently across stimulation frequencies

volgende artikel The impact of task-irrelevant reward on object-based attentional selection in conflict contexts

In Chinese, assessing the visual similarity of vocabulary is part of the process of orthographic processing. However, using the term "orthographic" to describe the names at the variable level is too vague. Additionally, the structure of Chinese characters resembles graphics more than letters, which is why we have opted for "graphical similarity" rather than "orthographic similarity." The term "glyph" implies a form of representation that is closer to the visual appearance of Chinese characters, such as font, but it does not match the original intent of our expression, and thus, we have chosen not to use it.

Alison, S. M., Karen, E., Chantel, S. P., Lindsay, K., & Lee, O. (2017). Brain-based individual difference measures of reading skill in deaf and hearing adults. Neuropsychologia, 101, 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.004CrossRef

Andin, J., & Holmer, E. (2022). Reorganization of large-scale brain networks in deaf signing adults: The role of auditory cortex in functional reorganization following deafness. Neuropsychologia, 166, 108139. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00683PubMedCrossRef

Asano, M., Imai, M., Kita, S., Kitajo, K., Okada, H., & Thierry, G. (2015). Sound symbolism scaffolds language development in preverbal infants. Cortex, 63, 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.025PubMedCrossRef

Bélanger, N. N., & Rayner, K. (2015). What eye movements reveal about deaf readers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414567527PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Bonna, K., Finc, K., Zimmermann, M., Bola, L., Mostowski, P., Szul, M., & Szwed, M. (2021). Early deafness leads to re-shaping of functional connectivity beyond the auditory cortex. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 15(3), 1469–1482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1335-zPubMedCrossRef

Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2002). Modality independence of word comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 16(4), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/HBM.10054PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Booth, J. R., Perfetti, C. A., & MacWhinney, B. (1999). Quick, automatic, and general activation of orthographic and phonological representations in young readers. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.3PubMedCrossRef

Borgström, K., Von Koss Torkildsen, J., & Lindgren, M. (2015). Substantial gains in word learning ability between 20 and 24 months: A longitudinal ERP study. Brain and Language, 149, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.002PubMedCrossRef

Brigitte, R. O., Mark, W., Davide, B., Elena, N., Pia, L., & Francesco, P. (2010). Enhanced reactivity to visual stimuli in deaf individuals. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 28(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2014.09.001CrossRef

Brittany, L., Priscilla, M. M., Katherine, J. M., Phillip, J. H., & Karen, E. (2022). Sensitivity to orthographic vs. phonological constraints on word recognition: An ERP study with deaf and hearing readers. Neuropsychologia, 177, 108420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108420CrossRef

Cardin, V., Rudner, M., De Oliveira, R. F., Andin, J., Su, M. T., Beese, L., & Rönnberg, J. (2018). The organization of working memory networks is shaped by early sensory experience. Cerebral Cortex, 28(10), 3540–3554. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx222PubMedCrossRef

Catherine, E. L. (2017). A perceptual advantage for onomatopoeia in early word learning: Evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.017CrossRef

Chen, B., Liu, W., Wang, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2007). The timing of graphic, phonological and semantic activation of high and low frequency Chinese characters: An ERP study. Progress in Natural Science, 17, 62–70.

Chen, C., Liu, Z., Su, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2018). The prediction effects for skill and less-skill deaf readers in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movement. Psychological Development and Education, 34(6), 692–699.

Chou, L.-C., Pan, Y.-L., & Lee, C. (2020). Emotion anticipation induces emotion effects in neutral words during sentence reading: Evidence from event-related potentials. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20(6), 1294–1308.CrossRef

Chou, T. L., Booth, J. R., Bitan, T., Burman, D. D., Bigio, J. D., Cone, N. E., & Cao, F. (2006). Developmental and skill effects on the neural correlates of semantic processing to visually presented words. Human Brain Mapping, 27(11), 915–924. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20231PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Chou, T. L., Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Bitan, T., Bigio, J. D., Lu, D., & Cone, N. E. (2006). Developmental changes in the neural correlates of semantic processing. NeuroImage, 29(4), 1141–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.064PubMedCrossRef

Costello, B., Caffarra, S., Fariña, N., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2021). Reading without phonology: ERP evidence from skilled deaf readers of Spanish. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-021-84490-5CrossRef

Dambacher, M., Kliegl, R., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading. Brain Research, 1084(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.010PubMedCrossRef

Deacon, D., Dynowska, A., Ritter, W., & Grose-Fifer, J. (2004). Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: Implications for theories of N400 and word recognition. Psychophysiology, 41, 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00120PubMedCrossRef

DeLong, K. A., Troyer, M., & Kutas, M. (2014). Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(12), 631–645.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Du, L., & Shao, W. (2003). On the basic characteristics and cause of onomatopoeia. Linguistic Research, 4, 25–28.

Emmorey, K., & Lee, B. (2021). The neurocognitive basis of skilled reading in prelingually and profoundly deaf adults. Language and Linguistics Compass, 15(2), e12407. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12407PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Fang, Y., & Jiang, X. (2012). A study on individual differences of L2 Chinese learners in inferring novel word meanings by integrating information. Chinese Teaching in the Word, 26(3), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.13724/j.cnki.ctiw.2012.03.007CrossRef

Fariña, N., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2017). Phonological and orthographic coding in deaf skilled readers. Cognition, 168, 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.015PubMedCrossRef

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149.10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149PubMedCrossRef

Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., Pethick, S. J., & Stiles, J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(5), i–185.CrossRef

Friesen, D. C. , & Joanisse, M. F. (2012). Homophone effects in deaf readers: evidence from lexical decision. Reading & Writing, 25(2), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9275-6CrossRef

Gabriela, M., Brittany, L., Natasja, M., Phillip, J. H., Katherine, J. M., & Karen, E. (2021). The organization of the American Sign Language lexicon: Comparing one- and two-parameter ERP phonological priming effects across tasks. Brain and Language, 218, 104960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104960CrossRef

Geng, E. (1994). The symbol problems associated with onomatopoeia. Studies of the Chinese Language, (3), 186–189.

Gao, S., Lan, Z., Dong, C., Liang, X., & Yan, G. (2021). A longitudinal study on Chinese reading ability of deaf students in primary school. Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation, 19(1), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2021.01.014CrossRef

Grossman, M., Koenig, P., Glosser, G., DeVita, C., Moore, P., Rhee, J., & Gee, J. (2003). Neural basis for semantic memory difficulty in Alzheimer’s disease: An fMRI study. Brain, 126(2), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awg027PubMedCrossRef

Gutierrez-Sigut, E., Vergara-Martínez, M., & Perea, M. (2017). Early use of phonological codes in deaf readers: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 106, 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.006PubMedCrossRef

Gutierrez-Sigut, E., Vergara-Martínez, M., & Perea, M. (2022). The impact of visual cues during visual word recognition in deaf readers: An ERP study. Cognition, 218, 104938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104938PubMedCrossRef

Hao, M., & Zhou, S. (2019). A study on beginning learners’ accuracy and fluency of Chinese reading. Chinese Teaching in the World, 33(4), 548–562. https://doi.org/10.13724/j.cnki.ctiw.2019.04.002CrossRef

Hashimoto, T., Usui, N., Taira, M., Nose, I., Haji, T., & Kojima, S. (2006). The neural mechanism associated with the processing of onomatopoeic sounds. NeuroImage, 31(04), 1762–1770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.019PubMedCrossRef

Holcomb, P. J., Akers, E. M., Midgley, K. J., & Emmorey, K. (2024). Orthographic and phonological code activation in deaf and hearing readers. Journal of Cognition, 7(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.326PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series b, Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130298. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0298PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M., & Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition, 109(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.015PubMedCrossRef

Karen, E., Jill, W., Stephen, M., & Jennifer, A. F. P. (2013). Mapping the reading circuitry for skilled deaf readers: An fMRI study of semantic and phonological processing. Brain and Language, 126(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.001CrossRef

Kong, L., & Zhang, B. (2020). The Effect of sub-lexical phonology on P200 in Chinese word recognition. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 18(3), 304–310.

Kong, L., Zhang, B., Zhang, J. X., & Kang, C. P. (2012). P200 can be modulated by orthography alone in reading Chinese words. Neuroscience Letters, 529(2), 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.09.028PubMedCrossRef

Kong, L., Zhang, J. X., Kang, C. P., Du, Y. C., Zhang, B., & Wang, S. P. (2010). P200 and phonological processing in Chinese word recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 473(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.02.014PubMedCrossRef

Kramer, A. F., & Donchin, E. (1987). Brain potentials as indices of orthographic and phonological interaction during word matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.1.76PubMedCrossRef

Kretzschmar, F., Schlesewsky, M., & Staub, A. (2015). Dissociating word frequency and predictability effects in reading: Evidence from coregistration of eye movements and EEG. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1648–1662. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000128PubMedCrossRef

Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology, 11, 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(80)90046-0PubMedCrossRef

Laing, C. E. (2017). A perceptual advantage for onomatopoeia in early word learning: Evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.017PubMedCrossRef

Laing, C. E. (2019). Phonological motivation for the acquisition of onomatopoeia: An analysis of early words. Language Learning and Development, 15(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2019.1577138CrossRef

Lan, Z., Liang, X., Wang, Z., Jiang, K., Meng, Z., & Yan, G. (2020). Phonological processing during sentence reading in deaf college students: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Psychological Science, 43(4), 997–1003. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20200434CrossRef

Lee, B., Martinez, P. M., Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Emmorey, K. (2022). Sensitivity to orthographic vs. phonological constraints on word recognition: An ERP study with deaf and hearing readers. Neuropsychologia, 177, 108420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108420PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Lee, C. Y., Tsai, J. L., Chan, W. H., Hsu, C. H., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. (2007). Temporal dynamics of the consistency effect in reading Chinese: An event-related potentials study. NeuroReport, 18(2), 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e328010d4e4PubMedCrossRef

Lee, H. W., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). The time course of phonological, semantic and orthographic coding in reading: Evidence from the fast-priming technique. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 624–634. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212971CrossRef

Leybaert, J., Bayard, C., Colin, C., & LaSasso, C. (2015). Cued speech and cochlear implants: A powerful combination for natural spoken language acquisition and the development of reading. The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies in Language (pp. 359–376).

Leybaert, J., & LaSasso, C. J. (2010). Cued speech for enhancing speech perception and first language development of children with cochlear implants. Trends in Amplification, 14(2), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1084713810375567PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Li, H., He, S., & Liu, Z. (2020). ERPs study on the effect of fast reading training on attention based on visual beam search. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 18(1), 78–84.

Lin, D., & Teng, C. (2005). Event-related potentials (ERP). Journal of Chengde Medical University, 22(3), 257–258. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-6879.2005.03.042CrossRef

Liu, N., Wang, X., Liu, Z., Wang, Y., & Yan, G. (2019). The effect of contextual predictability on parafoveal process for highly-and low-skilled developing readers during Chinese reading. Journal of Psychological Science, 42(4), 848–853. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20190412CrossRef

Liu, Y., Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2003). ERP evidence for the time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic information in Chinese meaning and pronunciation decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), 1231–1247. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1231PubMedCrossRef

Liu, Z., Hao, M., & Wang, F. (2020). The relative importance of orthographic awareness and phonological awareness in the early stage of Chinese character acquisition among Chinese L2 learners. TCSOL Study, 3, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.16131/j.cnki.cn44-1669/g4.2020.03.007CrossRef

Liu, Z., Tong, W., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Predicting impacts word and character processing in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(9), 1031–1047. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.01031CrossRef

Lockwood, G., Dingemanse, M., & Hagoort, P. (2016). Sound-symbolism boosts novel word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(8), 1274–1281. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000235PubMedCrossRef

María, F. A., Juan, I. N., & Marcos, A. T. (2017). The anatomy of onomatopoeia. PLoS One, 6(12), e28317. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028317CrossRef

Misra, M., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Event-related potential indices of masked repetition priming. Psychophysiology, 40(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00012PubMedCrossRef

Munakata, Y., & Johnson, M. H. (2006). Attention and performance XXI: Processes of change in brain and cognitive development. Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Mutsumi, I., & Sotaro, K. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130298. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0298CrossRef

Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1999). Reading and “incidental” L2 vocabulary acquisition: An introspective study of lexical inferencing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 195–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/s027226319900203xCrossRef

Perfetti, C. A., & Sandak, R. (2000). Reading optimally builds on spoken language: Implications for deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/5.1.32PubMedCrossRef

Qiao, S. (2020). The Application Research of Contextual Theory in Secondary School Chinese Language Reading Teaching and Text Analysis (master’s thesis). Tianjin Normal University. https://doi.org/10.27363/d.cnki.gtsfu.2020.000476

Qing, C., & Marc, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One, 5(6), e10729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729CrossRef

Qiu, W. (2011). A brief analysis of context and english vocabulary learning. Youth Literator, 07, 74.

Rayner, K., Li, X., Juhasz, B. J., & Yan, G. (2005). The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 1089–1093. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206448CrossRef

Ren, G., Han, Y., & Yu, Z. (2008). Effects of sentence context on the resolution of Chinese lexical ambiguity. Psychological Science, 31(4), 875–879. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2008.04.019CrossRef

Ren, G., Han, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2007). An ERP study on the resolution of Chinese lexical ambiguity in sentence context. Psychological Science, 30(6), 1345–1350. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2007.06.025CrossRef

Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., & Rubenstein, M. A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(6), 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80094-4CrossRef

Rugg, M. D. (1987). Dissociation of semantic priming, word and non-word repetition effects by event-related potentials. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Sections A, 39(1), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724988743000060CrossRef

Sehyr, Z. S., & Emmorey, K. (2022). Contribution of lexical quality and sign language variables to reading comprehension. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 27(4), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enac018PubMedCrossRef

Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90029-0PubMedCrossRef

Shiell, M. M., Champoux, F., & Zatorre, R. J. (2015). Reorganization of auditory cortex in early-deaf people: Functional connectivity and relationship to hearing aid use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(1), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1162/JOCN_A_00683PubMedCrossRef

Smejkalova, A., & Chetail, F. (2023). Learning spelling from meaning. Experimental Psychology, 70(3), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000587PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Swaab, T. Y., Ledoux, K., Camblin, C. C., & Boudewyn, M. (2012). Language related ERP components. In: Steven J. Luck & Emily Kappenman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of event-related potential components.

Taft, M., & Van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(2), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2538CrossRef

Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Simmons, K., & Laughon, P. (1990). Identifying phonological coding problems in disabled readers: Naming, counting, or span measures? Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(4), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510350CrossRef

Wang, T., Zhou, M., & Wang, Q. (2018). Interaction of stimulus quality and frequency on N400 in Chinese Characters. Journal of Psychological Science, 41(2), 312–317. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20180209CrossRef

Wang, Y. (2006). Enhancing the efficiency of inferring word meanings and acquiring vocabulary in context. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2, 47–50.

Wauters, L. N., Van Bon, W. H., & Tellings, A. E. (2006). Reading comprehension of Dutch deaf children. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5894-0CrossRef

Wei, W., Huang, Z., Feng, C., & Qu, Q. (2023). Predicting phonological information in language comprehension: Evidence from ERP representational similarity analysis and Chinese idioms. Cerebral Cortex, 33(15), 9367–9375. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad209PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. Wiley Press.

Wu, Y., Mo, D. Y., Tsang, Y. K., & Chen, H. C. (2012). ERPs reveal sublexical processing in Chinese character recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 514(2), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.080PubMedCrossRef

Xu, Q., & Hu, X. (2019). A study of Chinese language reading ability of children with hearing impairment: The role of phonological processing and oral vocabulary. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 9, 35–43.

Zan, F. (2002). Phonological coding in Chinese characters reading of deaf subjects (Doctoral dissertation). Shanghai: East China Normal University.

Zhang, H., Su, I. F., Chen, F., Ng, M. L., Wang, L., & Yan, N. (2019). The time course of orthographic and semantic activation in Chinese character recognition: Evidence from anERP study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(3), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1652762CrossRef

Zhang, Q., Zhang, J. X., & Kong, L. Y. (2009). An ERP study on the time course of phonological and semantic activation in Chinese word recognition. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 73(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.04.001PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Processing of onomatopoeia by hearing-reduced students in sentence context: a study based on ERPs
Auteurs: Jinhe Han
Shuhua Su
Qiaoyun Liu
Publicatiedatum: 01-04-2025
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2025
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-025-02113-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2025

Not all emotional expressions facilitate recognition of other-race faces in Chinese infants

Open Access
Research

Facial expression adaptation impairs perceived social signal across expressions

Open Access
Research

Differences between children and young adults in the effects of difficulty and value of learning items on cognitive offloading strategies

Research

Does preparation generate the cost of task switching? A recipe for a switch cost after cue-only trials

Open Access
Research

Repetition increases the perceived truth of inferred statements: evidence from transitive relations and non-transitive relations

Research

Kinematic observation benefits from motor repertoire in episodic memory: a study in young and older adults

Research

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Processing of onomatopoeia by hearing-reduced students in sentence context: a study based on ERPs

Abstract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2025

Not all emotional expressions facilitate recognition of other-race faces in Chinese infants

Facial expression adaptation impairs perceived social signal across expressions

Differences between children and young adults in the effects of difficulty and value of learning items on cognitive offloading strategies

Does preparation generate the cost of task switching? A recipe for a switch cost after cue-only trials

Repetition increases the perceived truth of inferred statements: evidence from transitive relations and non-transitive relations

Kinematic observation benefits from motor repertoire in episodic memory: a study in young and older adults

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Not all emotional expressions facilitate recognition of other-race faces in Chinese infants

Facial expression adaptation impairs perceived social signal across expressions

Differences between children and young adults in the effects of difficulty and value of learning items on cognitive offloading strategies

Does preparation generate the cost of task switching? A recipe for a switch cost after cue-only trials

Repetition increases the perceived truth of inferred statements: evidence from transitive relations and non-transitive relations

Kinematic observation benefits from motor repertoire in episodic memory: a study in young and older adults