A paragraph describing intervention effects on explanatory style for negative events was accidentally left out of the paper Gillham, J.E., Hamilton, J., Freres, D.R., Patton, K., & Gallop, R. (2006). Preventing Depression among Early Adolescents in the Primary Care Setting: A randomized controlled study of the Penn Resiliency Program,
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 203-219. The missing paragraph is presented below along with Table
2 from the original paper which presents mean scores for explanatory style for negative events (CN) on the Children’s Attributional Style Questionnaire (CASQ: Seligman et al.
1984).
Table 2
Mean explanatory style for negative events (CN) scores by condition: raw mean (SD)
|
Baseline
|
7.85 (2.95)
|
8.02 (3.25)
|
7.52 (2.90)
|
8.20 (3.13)
|
8.22 (2.98)
|
7.83 (3.40)
|
|
n = 142
|
n = 112
|
n = 74
|
n = 57
|
n = 68
|
n = 55
|
|
Post
|
7.57 (3.25)
|
8.13 (3.11)
|
6.68 (2.93)
|
8.42 (2.90)
|
8.69 (3.30)
|
7.76 (3.36)
|
|
n = 111
|
n = 104
|
n = 62
|
n = 59
|
n = 49
|
n = 45
|
|
6 months
|
7.40 (3.26)
|
8.32 (3.04)
|
6.60 (3.03)
|
8.44 (2.67)
|
8.33 (3.31)
|
8.16 (3.53)
|
|
n = 110
|
n = 100
|
n = 59
|
n = 59
|
n = 51
|
n = 41
|
|
12 months
|
7.56 (3.52)
|
8.30 (3.36)
|
7.15 (3.26)
|
8.35 (3.12)
|
8.03 (3.79)
|
8.22 (3.78)
|
|
n = 101
|
n = 90
|
n = 54
|
n = 57
|
n = 47
|
n = 33
|
|
18 months
|
7.83 (3.38)
|
8.14 (3.29)
|
7.20 (3.12)
|
7.62 (2.74)
|
8.84 (3.57)
|
9.03 (3.96)
|
|
n = 96
|
n = 82
|
n = 59
|
n = 52
|
n = 37
|
n = 30
|
|
24 months
|
8.60 (3.75)
|
8.96 (3.22)
|
7.58 (3.51)
|
8.59 (2.88)
|
9.98 (3.67)
|
9.54 (3.66)
|
|
n = 96
|
n = 82
|
n = 55
|
n = 50
|
n = 41
|
n = 32
|
…
