Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Ga naar:
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
BSL Shop
Inloggen

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Erasmus MC heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

» Andere revante producten voor Erasmus MC studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van Erasmus MC, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van Erasmus MC.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research

20-01-2025 | Review

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used among liver transplant recipients: a systematic review and methodological quality appraisal

Auteurs: Qi Zhang, Xiao Chen, YiChen Kang, JingXian Yu, YuXia Zhang

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Aim

To identify instruments used to measure patient-reported outcomes after LT, and critically evaluate their measurement properties.

Methods

Five online databases were searched to find English-language LT-specific PROMs from their inception to October 2024. Studies describing the development or validation of PROMs were included. Two reviewers extracted and synthesized information about the characteristics of the studies and instruments. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instrument (COSMIN). Two reviewers independently evaluated the methodological quality of the included instruments.

Results

A total of 17 studies involving 14 PROMs met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The included PROMs assessed a range of outcomes, including health-related quality of life, therapeutic adherence, symptom experience, social participation, feeling for the donor, satisfaction and informational needs. None of the 14 scales reported the ten boxes of measurement properties outlined by the COSMIN. Among all the measurement properties, content validity from expert (64.3%, 9/14) and internal consistency (57.1%, 8/14) were the two most frequently measured attributes. Less than half of the studies evaluated the content validity from the patients’ perspective. Four studies evaluated structural validity using exploratory factor analysis, but no study conducted confirmatory factor analysis or used IRT method to measure the structural validity.

Conclusion

This systematic review provided an overall picture and detailed analysis of LT-specific PROMs, and highlighted the paucity of well-developed and validated instruments. Further studies are urgently needed, both in terms of exploring patients’ health concerns after LT and validating the instruments.

Reporting method

This study is reported according to the PRISMA Statement.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Dienstag, J. L., & Cosimi, A. B. (2012). Liver transplantation–a vision realized. New England Journal of Medicine, 367(16), 1483–1485.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Liao, L., Chung, S., Altamirano, J., Garcia, L., Fassiotto, M., Maldonado, B., Heidenreich, P., & Palaniappan, L. (2020). The association between Asian patient race/ethnicity and lower satisfaction scores. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1–11.CrossRef
3.
Dunn, M. A., Rogal, S. S., Duarte-Rojo, A., & Lai, J. C. (2020). Physical function, physical activity, and quality of life after liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation, 26(5), 702–708.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
Åberg, F. (2020). Quality of life after liver transplantation. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 46–47, 101684.CrossRef
5.
Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Powers, J. H., Scott, J. A., Rock, E. P., Dawisha, S., O’Neill, R., & Kennedy, D. L. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value in Health, 10, S125–S137.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Comins, J. D., Brodersen, J., Siersma, V., Jensen, J., Hansen, C. F., & Krogsgaard, M. R. (2021). How to develop a condition-specific PROM. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 31(6), 1216–1224.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A. C., Chiarotto, A., Westerman, M. J., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C. W., & Mokkink, L. B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 27(5), 1159–1170.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Gram, E. G., ÁR, J., Heiberg, A., Martiny, F., Bie, A., & Brodersen, J. B. (2023). Methodological quality of proms in psychosocial consequences of colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review. Patient Related Outcome Measures, 14, 31–47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Churruca, K., Pomare, C., Ellis, L. A., Long, J. C., Henderson, S. B., Murphy, L. E. D., Leahy, C. J., & Braithwaite, J. (2021). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): A review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues. Health Expectations, 24(4), 1015–1024.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Bernstein, D. N., Houck, J. R., Mahmood, B., & Hammert, W. C. (2019). Responsiveness of the PROMIS and its concurrent validity with other region- and condition-specific PROMs in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 477(11), 2544–2551.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Desai, R., Jamieson, N. V., Gimson, A. E., Watson, C. J., Gibbs, P., Bradley, J. A., & Praseedom, R. K. (2008). Quality of life up to 30 years following liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation, 14(10), 1473–1479.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Gangeri, L., Alfieri, S., Scrignaro, M., Brunellia, C., Bianchi, E., Bosisio, M., Zoncheddu, P., Ferri, F., Biffa, G., & Parks-Vernizzi, E. (2022). Development of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy - Liver transplant (FACT-LT) scale. International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine, 13(1), 28–35.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Vedadi, A., Khairalla, R., Che, A., Nagee, A., Saqib, M., Ayub, A., Wasim, A., Macanovic, S., Orchanian-Cheff, A., & Selzner-Malekkiani, N. (2023). Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in liver transplantation: A scoping review. Quality of Life Research, 32(9), 2435–2445.PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 19(4), 539–549.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L., Ostelo, R. W., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2012). Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 21(4), 651–657.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Beresford, T. P., Martin, B., & Alfers, J. (2004). Developing a brief monitoring procedure for alcohol-dependent liver graft recipients. Psychosomatics, 45(3), 220–223.PubMedCrossRef
18.
LoBiondo-Wood, G., Williams, L., Wood, R. P., & Shaw, B. W., Jr. (1997). Impact of liver transplantation on quality of life: A longitudinal perspective. Applied Nursing Research, 10(1), 27–32.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Saab, S., Ng, V., Landaverde, C., Lee, S. J., Comulada, W. S., Arevalo, J., Durazo, F., Han, S. H., Younossi, Z., & Busuttil, R. W. (2011). Development of a disease-specific questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transplantation, 17(5), 567–579.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Belle, S. H., Porayko, M. K., Hoofnagle, J. H., Lake, J. R., & Zetterman, R. K. (1997). Changes in quality of life after liver transplantation among adults. Liver Transplantation and Surgery, 3(2), 93–104.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Cowling, T., Jennings, L. W., Goldstein, R. M., Sanchez, E. Q., Chinnakotla, S., Klintmalm, G. B., & Levy, M. F. (2004). Societal reintegration after liver transplantation: Findings in alcohol-related and non–alcohol-related transplant recipients. Annals of Surgery, 239(1), 93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Tohidinezhad, F., Aliakbarian, M., Abu-Hanna, A., & Eslami, S. (2019). Development and psychometric testing of liver transplant therapeutic adherence questionnaire in a triphasic mixed-method study. Progress in Transplantation, 29(2), 122–128.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Khodaveisi, M., Khatiban, M., Toosi, M. N., Soltanian, A. R., Ebadi, A., & Sadat Moayed, M. (2021). Designing and psychometric properties of appraisal adherence to care and treatment scale in liver transplantation recipients. Hepatitis Monthly, 21(5), 1–10.CrossRef
24.
Yekta, Z. P., Tayebi, Z., Shahsavari, H., Ebadi, A., Tayebi, R., Bolourchifard, F., & Rafii, F. (2013). Liver transplant recipients quality of life instrument: Development and psychometric testing. Hepatitis Monthly, 13(10), e9701.
25.
Gangeri, L., Alfieri, S., Scrignaro, M., Brunelli, C., Bianchi, E., Bosisio, M., Zoncheddu, P., Ferri, F., Biffa, G., & Parks-Vernizzi, E. (2022). Development of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-liver transplant (FACT-LT) scale. International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine, 13(1), 28–35.PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Franciosi, M., Caccamo, L., De Simone, P., Pinna, A. D., Di Costanzo, G. G., Volpes, R., Scuderi, V., Strignano, P., Boccagni, P., & Burra, P. (2012). Development and validation of a questionnaire evaluating the impact of hepatitis B immune globulin prophylaxis on the quality of life of liver transplant recipients. Liver Transplantation, 18(3), 332–339.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Medeiros, R., Mattiello, R., Corruble, E., Sarria, E. E., Molski, C., & Brandão, A. (2018). Cultural validation of the transplanted organ questionnaire (TOQ) for the Brazilian population. Annals of Hepatology, 17(1), 92–97.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Molski, C., Mattiello, R., Sarria, E. E., Saab, S., Medeiros, R., & Brandão, A. (2016). Cultural validation of the post-Liver transplant quality of life (pLTQ) questionnaire for the Brazilian population. Annals of Hepatology, 15(3), 377–385.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Chen, X., Zhang, Y., & Yu, J. (2021). Symptom experience and related predictors in liver transplantation recipients. Asian Nursing Research, 15(1), 8–14.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Javaherian M, Abazari N, Nejatisafa A-A, Nasiri-Toosi M, Jafarian A, Soleimani M, Moghaddam BA: The Post-Liver Transplant Quality of Life Instrument: Translation, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version. 2021.
31.
Estraviz, B., Quintana, J. M., Valdivieso, A., Bilbao, A., Padierna, A., De Urbina, J. O., & Sarabia, S. (2007). Factors influencing change in health-related quality of life after liver transplantation. Clinical Transplantation, 21(4), 481–499.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Corruble, E., Barry, C., Varescon, I., Castaing, D., Samuel, D., & Falissard, B. (2012). The transplanted organ questionnaire: A validation study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 73(4), 319–324.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Ko, D., Lee, I., & Muehrer, R. J. (2016). Informational needs of liver transplant recipients during a two-year posttransplant period. Chronic Illness, 12(1), 29–40.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Lohr, K. N. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11, 193–205.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Cano, S., Browne, J., & Lamping, D. (2004). Patient-based measures of outcome in plastic surgery: Current approaches and future directions. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 57(1), 1–11.PubMedCrossRef
36.
37.
Stenner AJ, Smith III M, Burdick DS (2022). Toward a theory of construct definition. In: Explanatory Models, Unit Standards, and Personalized Learning in Educational Measurement: Selected Papers by A Jackson Stenner. Springer 43–55.
38.
39.
Thanasegaran G: Reliability and Validity Issues in Research. Integration & Dissemination 2009, 4.
40.
Primi, C., Morsanyi, K., Chiesi, F., Donati, M. A., & Hamilton, J. (2016). The development and testing of a new version of the cognitive reflection test applying item response theory (IRT). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(5), 453–469.CrossRef
41.
Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16, 5–18.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., Ader, D., Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Rose, M. (2007). The Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5), S3–S11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., & Choi, S. (2010). The Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Pettersen, K. I., Veenstra, M., Guldvog, B., & Kolstad, A. (2004). The Patient experiences questionnaire: Development, validity and reliability. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 16(6), 453–463.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Bastemeijer, C. M., Boosman, H., Zandbelt, L., Timman, R., de Boer, D., & Hazelzet, J. A. (2020). Patient experience monitor (PEM): The development of new short-form picker experience questionnaires for hospital patients with a wide range of literacy levels. Patient Related Outcome Measures, 11, 221–230.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Van Der Vleuten, C. P. (1996). The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 41–67.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used among liver transplant recipients: a systematic review and methodological quality appraisal
Auteurs
Qi Zhang
Xiao Chen
YiChen Kang
JingXian Yu
YuXia Zhang
Publicatiedatum
20-01-2025
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-03893-3