Introduction
As one of the primary cardiovascular afflictions in China, stroke imposes a substantial burden owing to its elevated prevalence, recurrence rates, mortality figures, and unfavorable prognoses [
1]. The incidence of ischemic stroke (IS), constituting 69.0–70.8% of stroke cases in China [
2] surged from 112 per 100,000 individuals in 2005 to 156 per 100,000 in 2017. Notably, the Chinese Health Statistics of 2020 revealed that the average direct medical expenditure for IS patients stands at Chinese Yuan (CNY) 9809, representing a third of the annual per capita disposable income recorded in 2019. With shifting lifestyles and an aging demographic, IS emerged as a significant health concern endangering the well-being of the Chinese populace.
Ischemic stroke can impair physical movements and trigger mental health challenges, significantly impacting the patient’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Various assessment scales have been devised to evaluate the health outcomes of stroke patients, including the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) [
3] and the National Institution of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) [
4]. Additionally, multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) such as EQ-5D and SF-6D are commonly employed to gauge the health outcomes of stroke patients. These scales are extensively utilized in both clinical trials and practice due to their ability to provide a comprehensive assessment of the patient's health status.
However, despite the crucial importance of generating evidence on HRQoL, there remains a need for more high-quality data from IS patients in China to bolster further research and inform healthcare decisions. Utility index scores measured using MAUIs could serve to compare different disease groups and aid in economic evaluations. Notably, the utility index scores of Chinese IS patients, as reported in current literature, exhibit considerable variation (range from 0.75 to 0.96) due to diverse study designs and patient characteristics [
5‐
7]. Moreover, there is a scarcity of studies focusing on the changes in health outcomes following stroke onset in China. Capturing the progress of disease could significantly benefit patient outcomes by enhancing disease management strategies and expanding treatment options.
Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to analyze and present the utility index scores of Chinese IS patients assessed with EQ-5D-3L utilizing data from a multi-center prospective longitudinal registration study. The secondary objective is to provide the HRQoL data of Chinses IS patients using disease specific measurements such as mRS and NIHSS. The results from this study aim to furnish data for heath assessment and clinical evidence for health decision-making.
Discussion
This study examined the HRQoL of Chinese IS patients measured by EQ-5D-3L from admission to 1-year post-stroke, utilizing data from a prospective multi-center real-world study. Utility index scores, mRS levels, and NIHSS scores measured at each visit were analyzed and compared. Substantial impairment of HRQoL was observed at admission compared to Chinese general population [
18], followed by significantly improvement thereafter. The gradual improvement was consistent with the findings reported in other studies [
19,
20]. However, the average utility index score of 1-year post-stroke patients was still worse than general population [
21], resulting from more problem reported in Mobility and Usual Activity. Compared to the 1-year post-stroke utility index scores (ranging from 0.33 to 0.83) reported by a systematic review [
22], the score from the current study is slightly higher (0.846). This difference may be attributed to variations baseline clinical status [
23] and differences in measurement properties across patients from different countries (e.g., the EQ-5D exhibits higher ceiling effect among the Chinese population) [
24]. According to the NIHSS scores, majority of the patients exhibited moderate or mild stroke. Sex and TOAST classification were found to significantly impact HRQoL, with IS notably affecting the Mobility and Usual Activity dimensions. Results from the mixed-effects regression analysis suggested that age, sex, insurance types, IS and diabetes history were impact factors during the disease recovery. These findings will contribute to the understanding of health outcomes research in Chinese IS patients. Additionally, summarizing the utility index scores stratified by mRS levels provides valuable evidence that can be applied in further research, including economic evaluation.
The representativeness of the characteristics for patients in our study is comparable with those reported from official statistical reports. As mentioned in the
China Stroke Statistics 2019 Report, the mean age for IS patients was 67.3, and the proportion of males accounted for 59.2% [
25]. Regarding medical insurance types, patients with Basic Medical insurance for Workers, Basic Medical insurance for Urban Residents, Basic Medical Insurance for Rural Residents accounted for 37.8, 22.9 and 15.4% [
25], respectively. The demographic characteristics of patients in our study (in Table
3) are similar to those from the stroke reports. According to the registry data from 2015 to 2018 in
China Stroke Statistics 2019 Report, proportions of patients with stroke history, diabetes history, high blood pressure history, dyslipidemia history, coronary heart disease, and atrial fibrillation are 23.9, 23.5, 63.0, 7.6, 10.5 and 6.9%, respectively [
26]. Disease histories reported in the report and our study are similar. However, the proportion of patients with cardioembolic stroke varies from 10 to 26% in the
Brief Report on Stroke Prevention and Treatment in China (2019) [
1]
, while patients with cardioembolic stroke was reported to be 4.25% at admission in our study. The lack of records of TOAST classifications in this study may explain this difference, though bias related to this factor was likely limited due to the relatively low percentage of cardioembolic stroke patients. The average length of stay was similar to that reported from
China Stroke Statistics 2019 Report [
27] (11.3 ± 8.3 days). It should be acknowledged that significant differences were observed between analytical samples and those excluded due to loss to follow-up, missing outcome data, or withdrawal. However, the large sample size likely mitigated the impact of loss to follow-up, missing outcome data or withdrawals. Overall, the patients included in our study were representative of individuals with IS in China.
Currently, there exists a research gap regarding the examination of HRQoL in Chinese patients diagnosed with IS. She et al. [
6] reported the HRQoL of IS patients using EQ-5D-3L within two weeks after admission. The results reported the average utility index and EQ-VAS scores as 0.746 and 72.7, similar to those reported at Visit B in the current study (utility = 0.714, EQ-VAS = 78.37). When conducting cost-utility analyses related to IS, careful consideration of the trend of utility index scores over time is crucial, especially since many analyses adopt a one-year cycle length [
28,
29]. Therefore, selecting the appropriate utility value to represent the health state in the first year of analysis is of paramount importance. Another gap exists in the economic evaluation related to IS. According to the economic evaluations of IS published recent years, Markov health state classified by mRS levels were widely applied [
30,
31]. However, high-quality evidence for economic evaluations specific to Chinese stroke patients remains limited. Consequently, most utility index scores for Chinese IS patients in the published literatures were derived from studies conducted in other countries [
32‐
34]. For example, the utility index scores used by Pan et al. in their cost-effectiveness analysis conducted in a Chinese context were derived from patients in other countries [
35]. These values differ from those estimated in current study (0.80 vs. 0.92 for mRS 0–1, 0.58 vs. 0.76 for mRS 2–3, 0.28 vs. 0.20 for mRS 4–5). The discrepancies in utility index scores may stem from different approaches for the measurement, and more importantly, diverse cultural backgrounds. In light of this difference, several guidelines for economic evaluation recommend using utility index scores from population within the same country or region [
36‐
38]. Therefore, summarizing the utility stratified by mRS from the representative study is valuable for future economic evaluation focus on the Chinese patients with IS.
As for health policy indications, firstly, sex differences significantly influence the utility index scores and mRS levels of patients, with female patients consistently experiencing worse outcomes than their male counterparts throughout the entire follow-up period. The disparities in the Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities dimensions were more pronounced. The cause of these differences may be attributed to the sex-specific differences in the recovery of body functions [
39,
40]. Additionally, females generally exhibit lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to males in the general population [
21]. These findings underscore the importance of considering sex-based heterogeneity in health outcomes and the unmet needs of cares for females during recovery. Secondly, the impact of TOAST classification on HRQoL suggests that cardioembolic stroke patients have the worst health status.
Brief Report on Stroke Prevention and Treatment in China (2019) revealed that atrial fibrillation was a major risk factor for cardioembolic stroke [
1]. Therefore, it is necessary to focus on preventing and screening for atrial fibrillation to reduce the prevalence of Cardioembolic stroke. Thirdly, as previously mentioned, IS affected various health dimensions differently, with Mobility and Usual Activities being the most impacted. Therefore, healthcare policies should be specifically designed to address the needs of physical function recovery. Furthermore, several impact factors were identified using the mix-effects models. Medical Insurance plans were found to significantly affect utility index scores and the five health dimensions. In general, people with BMIW, FMC, and BMI plans benefit from higher reimbursement rates and have better economic conditions. Thus, improving the medical insurance coverage could contribute to enhanced health outcomes. Patients with history of stroke or diabetes tended to report poorer HRQoL across all five health dimensions, and those with chronic heart disease (CHD) experienced severe status in Pain/Discomfort dimension. Consequently, disease management strategies should be strengthened for individuals with stroke, diabetes, or CHD history. Additionally, the mix-effect models revealed that TCM treatment showed negative impact on the HRQoL, particularly in the Usual Activity, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression dimensions. However, as information on other treatments received by patients was not included in this study, we are unable to account for the differences in HRQoL between patients receiving TCM treatment and those not receiving it. Future study could further investigate the impact of different treatments.
Despite the contribution of this study to the knowledge of IS and HRQoL, there remain some limitations. Firstly, this phase IV clinical trial relied on convenience sampling instead of random sampling, which may lead to sampling bias. Nevertheless, the comparison of patients' characteristics showed that the study's IS patients were representative. Secondly, the EQ-5D-3L was used instead of the EQ-5D-5L since EQ-5D-3L was more widely used when the study was initially designed in 2015. EQ-5D-5L could provide the advantage of reducing the ceiling effect observed in this study [
41]. Given that there are studies reporting mapping algorithms from EQ-5D-3L to EQ-5D-5L [
42‐
44], the results of our study can be transferred accordingly. However, as mentioned by Wailoo et al. [
45], EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L are not interchangeable in cost-effectiveness analysis. Therefore, researchers should take caution when mapping EQ-5D-3L values to EQ-5D-5L. Thirdly, the study excluded patients who were lost to follow-up, had missing data or withdrew from the study. Nevertheless, based on the comparison of characteristics, the impact of these exclusions appears to be limited. The sensitivity analysis of utility index scores yielded results similar to those of the base case. For the NIHSS scores, the sensitivity analysis showed slightly higher scores compared to the base case, likely because more severe patients failed to complete the NIHSS assessment, leading to the missing data.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.