Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Ga naar:
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
BSL Shop
Inloggen

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Erasmus MC heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

» Andere revante producten voor Erasmus MC studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van Erasmus MC, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van Erasmus MC.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Netherlands Heart Journal
Gepubliceerd in:

01-11-2007 | Original article

Long-term prognostic value of CFVR and FFR versus perfusion scintigraphy in patients with multivessel disease

Auteurs: S. A. J. Chamuleau, B. L. F. van Eck-Smit, M. Meuwissen, K. T. Koch, M. G. W. Dijkgraaf, H. J. Verberne, J. G. P. Tijssen, J. J. Piek

Gepubliceerd in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Uitgave 11/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Extract

Adequate patient selection for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is important in view of the potential procedural complications and the incidence of restenosis. Assessment of the functional significance of coronary lesions is mandatory, especially in intermediate coronary narrowings (40 to 70% diameter stenosis). Assessment can be performed noninvasively (using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy; MPS)1 or invasively during cardiac catheterisation using intracoronary derived haemodynamic indices.2 Previous validation studies have shown good agreement (80 to 90%) between these parameters and the results of noninvasive stress tests.3-5 …
vorige artikel Does glycoprotein IIB/IIIA resistance exist?
volgende artikel Inhibition of platelet function by abciximab or high-dose tirofiban in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI: a randomised trial
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Berman DS, Germano G, Shaw LJ. The role of nuclear cardiology in clinical decision making. Semin Nucl Med 1999;29:280-97.
2.
Kern MJ, Lerman A, Bech J-W, De Bruyne B, Eeckhout E, Fearon WF, et al. Physiological Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006;114:1321-41.
3.
Heller LI, Cates C, Popma J, Deckelbaum LI, Joye JD, Dahlberg ST, et al. Intracoronary Doppler assessment of moderate coronary artery disease: comparison with 201Tl imaging and coronary angiography. FACTS Study Group. Circulation 1997;96:484-90.
4.
Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Peels K, van der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek J, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1703-8.
5.
Chamuleau SAJ, Meuwissen M, Van Eck-Smit BLF, Koch KT, de Jong A, de Winter RJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1316-22.
6.
Chamuleau SAJ, Tio RA, De Cock CC, De Muinck ED, Pijls NHJ, van Eck-Smit BLF, et al. Prognostic value of coronary blood flow velocity and myocardial perfusion in intermediate coronary narrowings and multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:852-8.
7.
Bech GJW, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, de Muinck ED, Hoorntje JCA, Escaned J, et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation 2001;103:2928-34.
8.
Van der Zwet PM, Reiber JH. A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: the gradient field transform; basic principles and validation results. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:216-24.
9.
Verberne HJ, Piek JJ, van Liebergen RAM, Koch KT, Schroeder- Tanka JM, van Royen EA. Functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis by Doppler derived absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in comparison with Tc-99m MIBI SPECT. Heart 1999;82:509-14.
10.
Strauss HW, Miller DD, Wittry MD, Cerqueira MD, Garcia EV, Iskandrian AS, et al. Procedure guideline for myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med 1998;39:918-23.
11.
Gould KL, Kirkeeide RL, Buchi M. Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:459-74.
12.
Wijpkema JS, Van der Vleuten PA, Jessurun GA, Tio RA. Longterm safety of intracoronary haemodynamic assessment for deferral of angioplasty in intermediate coronary stenoses: a 5-year follow-up. Acta Cardiol 2005;60:207-11.
13.
Mates M, Hrabos V, Hajek P, Rataj O,Vojacek J. Long-term follow-up after deferral of coronary intervention based on myocardial fractional flow reserve measurement. Coron Artery Dis 2005;16:169-74.
14.
Berger A, Botman KJ, MacCarthy PA, Wijns W, Bartunek J, Heyndrikx GR, et al. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:438-42.
15.
Hachamovitch R, Berman DS. The use of nuclear cardiology in clinical decision making. Semin Nucl Med 2005;35:62-72.
16.
Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, Thomson LE, et al. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: Noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of non-invasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1107-18.
17.
Chamuleau SAJ, Dijkgraaf MGW, van Eck-Smit BLF, Tijssen JGP, Piek JJ. Cost-effectiveness of intracoronary flow velocity measurements and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for management of intermediate coronary lesions. Neth Heart J 2005;13:214-23.
18.
Fearon WF, Yeung AC, Lee DP, Yock PG, Heidenreich PA. Costeffectiveness of measuring fractional flow reserve to guide coronary interventions. Am Heart J 2003;145:882-7.
Metagegevens
Titel
Long-term prognostic value of CFVR and FFR versus perfusion scintigraphy in patients with multivessel disease
Auteurs
S. A. J. Chamuleau
B. L. F. van Eck-Smit
M. Meuwissen
K. T. Koch
M. G. W. Dijkgraaf
H. J. Verberne
J. G. P. Tijssen
J. J. Piek
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2007
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Uitgave 11/2007
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03086017

Andere artikelen Uitgave 11/2007

Inhibition of platelet function by abciximab or high-dose tirofiban in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI: a randomised trial

  • Original article

Transvenous pacing after the Mustard procedure: considering the complications

  • Case report

Stent thrombosis in real-world patients: a comparison of drug-eluting with bare metal stents

  • Original article

Coronary stent healing, endothelialisation and the role of co-medication

  • Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands

Images in cardiovascular medicine: Transkei heart

  • Imaging in cardiology

Does glycoprotein IIB/IIIA resistance exist?

  • Editorial