Top

Gepubliceerd in:

09-07-2024 | Letter to the Editor

Comment on “PRISMA–COSMIN guidance for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments”

Auteur: Kevin P. Weinfurt

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 8/2024

Extract

When choosing the most suitable outcome measurement instrument (OMI), investigators and other decision-makers often rely on the results of systematic reviews of OMIs. Improving the quality of reporting in such reviews can lead to better, and perhaps faster, decisions about which OMI is right for the job. Elsman and colleagues [1] report the results of an impressively systematic consensus process to develop guidance for reporting systematic reviews of OMIs. The resulting guidance—PRISMA–COSMIN for OMIs 2024—will be useful for those conducting systematic reviews of OMIs, journal editors, manuscript reviewers, and consumers of systematic reviews. …

vorige artikel Moving towards increased implementation of evidence-based measurements through comprehensive and transparent reporting: the PRISMA–COSMIN 2024 reporting guideline

volgende artikel Validation practice in health: where do we go from here?

Elsman, E. B., Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Beaton, D., Gagnier, J. J., Tricco, A. C., Baba, A., Butcher, N. J., Smith, M., Hofstetter, C., Aiyegbusi, O. L., Berardi, A., Farmer, J., Haywood, K. L., Krause, K. R., Markham, S., Mayo-Wilson, E., Mehdipour, A., Ricketts, J., … Offringa, M. (2024). Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03634-yCrossRefPubMed

Walton, M. K., Powers, J. H., Hobart, J., Patrick, D., Marquis, P., Vamvakas, S., et al. (2015). Clinical outcome assessments: Conceptual foundation—Report of the ISPOR Clinical Outcomes Assessment—Emerging good practices for outcomes research task force. Value in Health, 18(6), 741–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2015.08.006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Chung, D. C., McCague, S., Yu, Z., Thill, S., DiStefano-Pappas, J., Bennett, J., Cross, D., Marshall, K., Wellman, J., & High, K. (2018). Novel mobility test to assess functional vision in patients with inherited retinal dystrophies. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 46(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13022CrossRefPubMed

Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12000CrossRef

Weinfurt, K. P. (2022). Constructing and evaluating a validity argument for a performance outcome measure for clinical trials: An example using the Multi-luminance Mobility Test. Clinical Trials, 19(2), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745211073609CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Comment on “PRISMA–COSMIN guidance for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments”
Auteur: Kevin P. Weinfurt
Publicatiedatum: 09-07-2024
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 8/2024
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03671-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2024

Low resilience is associated with worse health-related quality of life in caregivers of service members and veterans with traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal study

An empirical comparison of sleep-specific versus generic quality of life instruments among Australians with sleep disorders

Open Access

Introduction to “PRISMA-COSMIN for outcome measurement instruments 2024”

Editorial

Response to letters in QoLR

Letter to the Editor

Extending the PROMIS item bank “ability to participate in social roles and activities”: a psychometric evaluation using IRT

Open Access

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Comment on “PRISMA–COSMIN guidance for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments”

Extract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2024

Low resilience is associated with worse health-related quality of life in caregivers of service members and veterans with traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal study

An empirical comparison of sleep-specific versus generic quality of life instruments among Australians with sleep disorders

Introduction to “PRISMA-COSMIN for outcome measurement instruments 2024”

Response to letters in QoLR

Extending the PROMIS item bank “ability to participate in social roles and activities”: a psychometric evaluation using IRT

Examining health-related quality of life in ambulatory adult patients with chronic heart failure: insights from Malaysia using EQ-5D-5L

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Extract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Low resilience is associated with worse health-related quality of life in caregivers of service members and veterans with traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal study

An empirical comparison of sleep-specific versus generic quality of life instruments among Australians with sleep disorders

Introduction to “PRISMA-COSMIN for outcome measurement instruments 2024”

Response to letters in QoLR

Extending the PROMIS item bank “ability to participate in social roles and activities”: a psychometric evaluation using IRT

Examining health-related quality of life in ambulatory adult patients with chronic heart failure: insights from Malaysia using EQ-5D-5L