Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Ga naar:
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
BSL Shop
Inloggen

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Erasmus MC heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

» Andere revante producten voor Erasmus MC studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van Erasmus MC, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van Erasmus MC.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

30-10-2017

Development and validation of the smart management strategy for health assessment tool-short form (SAT-SF) in cancer survivors

Auteurs: Young Ho Yun, Ju Youn Jung, Jin Ah Sim, JongMog Lee, Dong-Young Noh, Wonshik Han, Kyu Joo Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Ji Won Park, Hong-Gyun Wu, Eui Kyu Chie, Hak Jae Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Jae-Ill Zo, Sung Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Jin Nam, Eun Sook Lee, Jae Hwan Oh, Young-Woo Kim, Young Tae Kim, Young Mog Shim

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 2/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a short form (SF) of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT) for cancer patients.

Methods

Data for item reduction were derived from cancer patient data (n = 300) previously used to develop the original SAT. We used regression methods to select and score the new SAT-SF. To assess the instrument’s reliability and validity, we recruited another 354 cancer patients from the same hospitals who were older than 18 years and accustomed to using the web. All results were compared with that of the long-form SAT (original SAT).

Results

The SAT-SF used is the shorter version, a 30-item (from the original 91-item) instrument, to measure cancer patient’s health. The 30-item SAT-SF explained 97.7% of total variance of the full 91-item long-form SAT. All SAT-SF subscales demonstrated a high reliability with good internal consistency compared with the original SAT. The total short-form scores of the three SAT sets (SAT-Core, SAT-Preparation, SAT-Implementation) differentiated participant groups according to their stage of goal implementation and percentage of actions taken in the 10 Rules for Highly Effective Health Behavior. We found acceptable correlations between the three SAT-SF sets and the additional assessment tools compared with the original SAT.

Conclusions

The 30-item SAT-SF had a satisfactory internal consistency and validity for cancer patients with minimal loss of information compared with the original SAT.
vorige artikel International development of four EORTC disease-specific quality of life questionnaires for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, high- and low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
volgende artikel New resilience instrument for patients with cancer
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Jemal, A., et al. (2009). Cancer statistics, 2009. C CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 59(4), 225–249.
2.
Kinsey, T., et al. (2008). Secular trends in mortality from common cancers in the United States by educational attainment, 1993–2001. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 100(14), 1003–1012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Cheung, W. Y., Neville, B. A., & Earle, C. C. (2010). Associations among cancer survivorship discussions, patient and physician expectations, and receipt of follow-up care. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28(15), 2577–2583.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Snyder, C. F., et al. (2009). Prevention, screening, and surveillance care for breast cancer survivors compared with controls: Changes from 1998 to 2002. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 27(7), 1054–1061.CrossRef
5.
Grunfeld, E., & Earle, C. C. (2010). The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: Treatment through survivorship. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2010(40), 25–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Park, S. M., et al. (2007). Prediagnosis smoking, obesity, insulin resistance, and second primary cancer risk in male cancer survivors: National Health Insurance Corporation Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 25(30), 4835–4843.CrossRef
7.
McCorkle, R., Lazenby, E. E., Schulman-Green, M., Schilling, D., Lorig, L. S., & Wagner, K. (2011). EH, Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness. C CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 61(1), 50–62.
8.
9.
Yun, Y. H., et al. (2015) Patient-reported assessment of self-management strategies of health in cancer patients: Development and validation of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT). Psycho-Oncology, 24, 1723–1730.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Wong, G. K. C., et al. (2013). Development of a short form of stroke-specific quality of life scale for patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 335(1), 204–209.CrossRefPubMed
11.
O’Connell, K. A., & Skevington, S. M. (2012). An international quality of life instrument to assess wellbeing in adults who are HIV-positive: A short form of the WHOQOL-HIV (31 items). AIDS and Behavior, 16(2), 452–460.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Bann, C. M., Fehnel, S. E., & Gagnon, D. D. (2003). Development and validation of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-short form (DFS-SF). PharmacoEconomics, 21(17), 1277–1290.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Ware, J. Jr., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Fayers, P. M., et al. (2001) EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. Belgium: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
15.
Ostermann, T., et al. (2005). The Herdecke questionnaire on quality of life (HLQ): Validation of factorial structure and development of a short form within a naturopathy treated in-patient collective. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, 40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Houghton, J. D., Dawley, D., & DiLiello, T. C. (2012). The abbreviated self-leadership questionnaire (ASLQ): A more concise measure of self-leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(201403):381–392
17.
Covey, S. (2009). Seven Habits ® Profile: Self-scoring seven habits profile.
18.
Yun, Y. H., et al. (2014). The association of self-leadership, health behaviors, and posttraumatic growth with health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 23(12), 1423–1430.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455–471.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Holden, L., et al. (2014). Validation of the MOS Social Support Survey 6-item (MOS-SSS-6) measure with two large population-based samples of Australian women. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 23(10), 2849–2853.CrossRef
21.
O’Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making, 15(1), 25–30.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Mühlan, H., et al. (2008). Short forms of subjective quality of life assessments from cross-cultural studies for use in surveys with different populations. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 15(3), 142–153.CrossRef
23.
Newcombe, P. A., Sheffield, J. K., & Chang, A. B. (2013). Parent cough-specific quality of life: Development and validation of a short form. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 131(4), 1069–1074.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Development and validation of the smart management strategy for health assessment tool-short form (SAT-SF) in cancer survivors
Auteurs
Young Ho Yun
Ju Youn Jung
Jin Ah Sim
JongMog Lee
Dong-Young Noh
Wonshik Han
Kyu Joo Park
Seung-Yong Jeong
Ji Won Park
Hong-Gyun Wu
Eui Kyu Chie
Hak Jae Kim
Kyung Hae Jung
Jae-Ill Zo
Sung Kim
Jeong Eon Lee
Seok Jin Nam
Eun Sook Lee
Jae Hwan Oh
Young-Woo Kim
Young Tae Kim
Young Mog Shim
Publicatiedatum
30-10-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1723-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2018

Examining the effect of peer helping in a coping skills intervention: a randomized controlled trial for advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients and their family caregivers

Child and adolescent self-report symptom measurement in pediatric oncology research: a systematic literature review

  • Review

Mental health, loneliness, and illness perception outcomes in quality of life among young breast cancer patients after mastectomy: the role of breast reconstruction

  • Brief Communication

Internet use, social networks, loneliness, and quality of life among adults aged 50 and older: mediating and moderating effects

The Minneapolis-Manchester Quality of Life Instrument: reliability and validity of the Adult Form in cancer survivors

Using case management in a universal health coverage system to improve quality of life of frequent Emergency Department users: a randomized controlled trial

  • Open Access