Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Ga naar:
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
BSL Shop
Inloggen

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Erasmus MC heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

» Andere revante producten voor Erasmus MC studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van Erasmus MC, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van Erasmus MC.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-11-2012 | Commentary

Improving the evaluation of model fit in confirmatory factor analysis: A commentary on Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K. (2011). Comparing higher-order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6

Auteur: Cameron N. McIntosh

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 9/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

This article is a brief commentary in response to “Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K. (2011). Comparing higher-order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, doi:10.​1007/​s11136-011-0082-6.” The commentary argues that approximate goodness-of-fit indexes cannot be used to salvage confirmatory factor models rejected by the Chi-square test of exact fit. Instead, rigorous diagnostic procedures should be used to identify and resolve the particular sources of model misspecification.
vorige artikel Comparing higher order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30
volgende artikel “It ain’t over till the fat lady sings”: a response to Cameron N. McIntosh, improving the evaluation of model fit in confirmatory factor analysis
Literatuur
1.
Gundy, C. M., Fayers, P. M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N. W., Sprangers, M. A. J., Velikov, G., & Aaronson, N. K. (2011). Comparing higher order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.​1007/​s11136-011-0082-6.
2.
Hayduk, L. A., Cummings, G., Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H., & Boulianne, S. (2007). Testing! Testing! one, two, three testing the theory in structural equation models! Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 841–850.CrossRef
3.
Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815–824.CrossRef
4.
McIntosh, C. N. (2007). Rethinking fit assessment in structural equation modelling: A commentary and elaboration on Barrett. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 859–867.CrossRef
5.
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
6.
Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling, 16(4), 561–582.CrossRef
7.
Cox, D. R., & Wermuth, N. (1996). Multivariate dependencies: Models, analysis and interpretation. London: Chapman & Hall.
8.
Barker, S. F. (1989). The elements of logic (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(4), 557–595.CrossRef
10.
Sörbom, D. (2001). Karl Jöreskog and LISREL: A personal story. In R. Cudeck, K. G. Jöreskog, S. H. C. Du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future: A festschrift in honor of Karl G. Jöreskog (pp. 1–10). Lincolnville, NE: Scientific Software International.
11.
Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2004). On Chi-square difference and z-tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(5), 737–757.CrossRef
12.
Hancock, G. R. (1999). A sequential Scheffé-type respecification procedure for controlling Type I error in exploratory structural equation model modification. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(2), 158–168.CrossRef
13.
Shipley, B. (2003). Testing recursive path models with correlated errors using d-separation. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(2), 214–221.CrossRef
14.
Kirby, J. B., & Bollen, K. A. (2009). Using instrumental variable (IV) tests to evaluate model specification in latent variable structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 39(1), 327–355.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J.-P., & Zhang, Z. (2011). Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Accepted for publication in Journal of Personality. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1467-6494.​2011.​00739.​x.
16.
Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(2), 189–225.CrossRef
17.
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., Scheines, R., & Tillman, R. (2010). Automated search for causal relations: Theory and practice. In R. Dechter, H. Geffner, & J. Y. Halpern (Eds.), Heuristics, probability, and causality: A tribute to Judea Pearl (pp. 467–506). London, UK: College Publications.
18.
Landsheer, J. A. (2010). The specification of causal models with Tetrad IV: A review. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(4), 703–711.CrossRef
19.
Xu, L. (2010). Bayesian Ying-Yang system, best harmony learning, and five action circling. Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering in China, 5(3), 281–328.CrossRef
20.
Tu, S., & Xu, L. (2011). Parameterizations make different model selections: Empirical findings from factor analysis. Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering in China, 6(2), 256–274.CrossRef
21.
Zheng, Z. E., & Pavlou, P. A. (2010). Research note: Toward a causal interpretation from observational data: A new bayesian networks method for structural models with latent variables. Information Systems Research, 21(2), 365–391.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Improving the evaluation of model fit in confirmatory factor analysis: A commentary on Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K. (2011). Comparing higher-order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6
Auteur
Cameron N. McIntosh
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 9/2012
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0084-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 9/2012

Changes in life satisfaction in persons with spinal cord injury during and after inpatient rehabilitation: adaptation or measurement bias?

  • Open Access

Development of an item bank and computer adaptive test for role functioning

Comparing higher order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30

  • Open Access

Drinking patterns, psychological distress and quality of life in a Norwegian general population-based sample

Sense of control and sociodemographic differences in self-reported health in older adults

Diagnostic delay, quality of life and patient satisfaction among women diagnosed with endometrial or ovarian cancer: a nationwide Danish study