Skip to main content

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Erasmus MC heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van Erasmus MC, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van Erasmus MC.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Top
Gepubliceerd in:

01-11-2013 | Original Article

Egocentric updating of remote locations

Auteurs: Marios N. Avraamides, Alexia Galati, Christothea Papadopoulou

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The study examined whether people update remote spatial locations in unfamiliar environments during physical movement. Participants learned a layout of objects from one perspective and carried out perspective-taking trials after physically rotating to a new perspective in either the same room as learning or in an adjacent room. Prior to rotation in the adjacent room participants were instructed to visualize the objects as being around them. Responses to perspective-taking trials involved either pointing or verbal labeling. In both testing environments, participants pointed more efficiently from imagined perspectives aligned with either the initial learning perspective or their current facing orientation than from a novel imagined perspective; this indicates that they had updated the encoded spatial relations during the physical rotation and treated remote objects as immediate. Differences in performance among perspectives were less pronounced for verbal labeling in both environments, suggesting that this response mode is more flexibly used from imagined perspectives.
Voetnoten
1
We use the term on-line updating to refer to updating that takes place effortlessly during movement as opposed to the deliberate computation of updated spatial relations that may take place following the movement.
 
2
Spatial updating studies generally include practice block trials that involve physical rotation. Although it could be argued that completing the physical rotation session might have influenced the pattern of results for the imagined rotation session, the most likely influence would be improved performance for the novel perspective, which would work against our efforts to document a difference between performance for the updated and the novel perspectives.
 
3
In line with previous studies (e.g., Kelly & McNamara, 2008), we report latencies based on all data. Analyses based on correct responses only yielded the same findings.
 
4
Further testing carried out in our lab confirmed that angles at diagonals often function as attractors of responses. An alternative account is that the large pointing errors stem from the exocentric nature of pointing, i.e., reproducing the directional relation between the pointer and the target (Philbeck, Sargent, Arthur, & Dopkins, 2008).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Avraamides, M. N., Ioannidou, L. M., & Kyranidou, M. N. (2007). Locating targets from imagined perspectives: Comparing labelling with pointing responses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1660–1679.CrossRef Avraamides, M. N., Ioannidou, L. M., & Kyranidou, M. N. (2007). Locating targets from imagined perspectives: Comparing labelling with pointing responses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1660–1679.CrossRef
go back to reference Avraamides, M. N., & Kelly, J. W. (2008). Multiple systems of spatial memory and action. Cognitive Processing, 9, 93–106. Avraamides, M. N., & Kelly, J. W. (2008). Multiple systems of spatial memory and action. Cognitive Processing, 9, 93–106.
go back to reference Avraamides, M. N., Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., & Golledge, R. G. (2004). Use of cognitive versus perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on the response mode. Psychological Science, 15, 403–408.PubMedCrossRef Avraamides, M. N., Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., & Golledge, R. G. (2004). Use of cognitive versus perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on the response mode. Psychological Science, 15, 403–408.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Avraamides, M. N., & Sofroniou, S. G. (2006). Spatial frameworks in imagined navigation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 510–515.CrossRef Avraamides, M. N., & Sofroniou, S. G. (2006). Spatial frameworks in imagined navigation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 510–515.CrossRef
go back to reference Baldwin, C. L., & Reagan, I. (2009). Individual differences in route-learning strategy and associated working memory resources. Human Factors, 51, 368–377.PubMedCrossRef Baldwin, C. L., & Reagan, I. (2009). Individual differences in route-learning strategy and associated working memory resources. Human Factors, 51, 368–377.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference De Vega, M., & Rodrigo, M. J. (2001). Updating spatial layouts mediated by pointing and labelling under physical and imaginary rotation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 369–393. De Vega, M., & Rodrigo, M. J. (2001). Updating spatial layouts mediated by pointing and labelling under physical and imaginary rotation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 369–393.
go back to reference Easton, R. D., & Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 483–500.PubMedCrossRef Easton, R. D., & Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 483–500.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Epstein, R. A, Higgins, J. S., Jablonski, K., & Feiler, A. M. (2007). Visual scene processing in familiar and unfamiliar environments. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 3670–3683. Epstein, R. A, Higgins, J. S., Jablonski, K., & Feiler, A. M. (2007). Visual scene processing in familiar and unfamiliar environments. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 3670–3683.
go back to reference Frankenstein, J., Mohler, B. J., Bülthoff, H. H., & Meilinger, T. (2012). Is the map in our head oriented north? Psychological Science, 23, 120–125.PubMedCrossRef Frankenstein, J., Mohler, B. J., Bülthoff, H. H., & Meilinger, T. (2012). Is the map in our head oriented north? Psychological Science, 23, 120–125.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Garden, S., Cornoldi, C., & Logie, R. H. (2002). Visuo-spatial working memory in navigation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 35–50.CrossRef Garden, S., Cornoldi, C., & Logie, R. H. (2002). Visuo-spatial working memory in navigation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 35–50.CrossRef
go back to reference Kelly, J. W., Avraamides, M. N., & Loomis, J. M. (2007). Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1092–1107.PubMedCrossRef Kelly, J. W., Avraamides, M. N., & Loomis, J. M. (2007). Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1092–1107.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kelly, J. W., & McNamara, T. P. (2008). Response mode differences in perspective taking: Differences in representation or differences in retrieval? Memory & Cognition, 36, 863–872.CrossRef Kelly, J. W., & McNamara, T. P. (2008). Response mode differences in perspective taking: Differences in representation or differences in retrieval? Memory & Cognition, 36, 863–872.CrossRef
go back to reference Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., & Golledge, R. G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9, 293–298.CrossRef Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., & Golledge, R. G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9, 293–298.CrossRef
go back to reference May, M. (2007). Imaginal repositioning in everyday environments: Effects of testing method and setting. Psychological Research, 71, 277–287.PubMedCrossRef May, M. (2007). Imaginal repositioning in everyday environments: Effects of testing method and setting. Psychological Research, 71, 277–287.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference McNamara, T. P. (2003). How are the locations of objects in the environment represented in memory? In. C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition III: Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial reasoning, LNAI 2685 (pp. 174–191). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. McNamara, T. P. (2003). How are the locations of objects in the environment represented in memory? In. C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition III: Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial reasoning, LNAI 2685 (pp. 174–191). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
go back to reference Meilinger, T., Knauff, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2008). Working memory in wayfinding: A dual task experiment in a virtual city. Cognitive Science, 32, 755–770.PubMedCrossRef Meilinger, T., Knauff, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2008). Working memory in wayfinding: A dual task experiment in a virtual city. Cognitive Science, 32, 755–770.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Meneghetti, C., De Beni, R., Gyselinck, V., & Pazzaglia, F. (2011). Working memory involvement in spatial text processing: What advantages are gained from extended learning and visuo-spatial strategies? British Journal of Psychology, 102, 499–518.PubMedCrossRef Meneghetti, C., De Beni, R., Gyselinck, V., & Pazzaglia, F. (2011). Working memory involvement in spatial text processing: What advantages are gained from extended learning and visuo-spatial strategies? British Journal of Psychology, 102, 499–518.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mou, W., McNamara, T. P., Valiquette, C. M., & Rump, B. (2004). Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 142–157.PubMedCrossRef Mou, W., McNamara, T. P., Valiquette, C. M., & Rump, B. (2004). Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 142–157.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Philbeck, J., Sargent, J., Arthur, J., & Dopkins, S. (2008). Large manual pointing errors, but accurate verbal reports, for indication of target azimuth. Perception, 37, 511–534.PubMedCrossRef Philbeck, J., Sargent, J., Arthur, J., & Dopkins, S. (2008). Large manual pointing errors, but accurate verbal reports, for indication of target azimuth. Perception, 37, 511–534.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Presson, C. C., & Montello, D. R. (1994). Updating after rotational and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space. Perception, 23, 1447–1455.PubMedCrossRef Presson, C. C., & Montello, D. R. (1994). Updating after rotational and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space. Perception, 23, 1447–1455.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rider, E. A., & Rieser, J. J. (1988). Pointing at objects in other rooms: young children’s sensitivity to perspective after walking with and without vision. Child Development, 59, 480–494.PubMedCrossRef Rider, E. A., & Rieser, J. J. (1988). Pointing at objects in other rooms: young children’s sensitivity to perspective after walking with and without vision. Child Development, 59, 480–494.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1157–1165.PubMedCrossRef Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1157–1165.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rieser, J. J., Guth, D. A., & Hill, E. W. (1986). Sensitivity to perspective structure while walking without vision. Perception, 15, 173–188. Rieser, J. J., Guth, D. A., & Hill, E. W. (1986). Sensitivity to perspective structure while walking without vision. Perception, 15, 173–188.
go back to reference Rieser, J. J., Garing, A. E., & Young, M. F. (1994). Imagery, action, and young children’s spatial orientation: It’s not being there that counts, it’s what one has in mind. Child Development, 65, 1262–1278.PubMedCrossRef Rieser, J. J., Garing, A. E., & Young, M. F. (1994). Imagery, action, and young children’s spatial orientation: It’s not being there that counts, it’s what one has in mind. Child Development, 65, 1262–1278.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rodrigo, M. J., de Vega, M., & Padrón, I. (2012). Common retrieval processes in producers and comprehenders of spatial information in a non-interactive task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 342–358.CrossRef Rodrigo, M. J., de Vega, M., & Padrón, I. (2012). Common retrieval processes in producers and comprehenders of spatial information in a non-interactive task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 342–358.CrossRef
go back to reference Waller, D., & Hodgson, E. (2006). Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 867–882.PubMedCrossRef Waller, D., & Hodgson, E. (2006). Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 867–882.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Waller, D., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., & Hegarty, M. (2002). Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1051–1063.PubMedCrossRef Waller, D., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., & Hegarty, M. (2002). Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1051–1063.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wang, R. F., & Brockmole, J. R. (2003a). Human navigation in nested environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 398–404.PubMedCrossRef Wang, R. F., & Brockmole, J. R. (2003a). Human navigation in nested environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 398–404.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wang, R. F., & Brockmole, J. R. (2003b). Simultaneous spatial updating in nested environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 981–986.CrossRef Wang, R. F., & Brockmole, J. R. (2003b). Simultaneous spatial updating in nested environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 981–986.CrossRef
go back to reference Wang, R. F., & Simons, D. J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 70, 191–210.PubMedCrossRef Wang, R. F., & Simons, D. J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 70, 191–210.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wraga, M. (2003). Thinking outside the body: An advantage for spatial updating during imagined versus physical self-rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 993–1005.PubMedCrossRef Wraga, M. (2003). Thinking outside the body: An advantage for spatial updating during imagined versus physical self-rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 993–1005.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Egocentric updating of remote locations
Auteurs
Marios N. Avraamides
Alexia Galati
Christothea Papadopoulou
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0465-5