Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Ga naar:
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
BSL Shop
Inloggen

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Erasmus MC heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

» Andere revante producten voor Erasmus MC studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van Erasmus MC, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van Erasmus MC.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-04-2007 | Original Article

Cognitive Neuroscience and Depression: Legitimate Versus Illegitimate Reductionism and Five Challenges

Auteur: Scott O. Lilienfeld

Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Uitgave 2/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

The provocative articles in this Special Issue underscore the potential of cognitive neuroscience to achieve fruitful integration across diverging levels of analysis. After a discussion of different forms of reductionism and the pragmatic, ideological, and cognitive obstacles standing in the way of achieving integrative explanatory pluralism, I outline five challenges to applying cognitive neuroscience to the study of depression and allied conditions: (1) comorbidity, (2) etiological heterogeneity, (3) ambiguity concerning causal primacy, (4) distinguishing state from trait markers, and (5) distinguishing specific from nonspecific treatment effects. Greater attention to these challenges should assist in bringing about consilience in the conceptualization of depression.
vorige artikel Neurobehavioral Therapies in the 21st Century: Summary of an Emerging Field and an Extended Example of Cognitive Control Training for Depression
Literatuur
Akiskal, H. S., & McKinney W. T. (1973). Depressive disorders: Toward a unified hypothesis. Science, 182, 20–29.PubMedCrossRef
Black, D. (2000). On the origin of morality. In L. D. Katz (Ed.), Evolutionary origins of morality: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 107–119). Bowling Green, OH: Imprint Academic.
Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Sheridan, J. F., & McClintock, M. K. (2000). Multi-level integrative analyses of human behavior: Social neuroscience and the complementing nature of social and biological approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 829–843.PubMedCrossRef
Caspi, A., Sugden, K., Moffitt, T. E., Taylor, A., Craig, I. W., Harrington. H., et al. (2003). Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science, 301, 386–389.PubMedCrossRef
Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685–716.PubMedCrossRef
Comte, A. (1830–1842). Cours de Philosophie positive, selections translated by Margaret Clarke as The Essential Comte. New York: Barnes and Noble.
Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Barkow, J. (1992). Introduction: Evolutionary psychology and conceptual integration. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 3–15). New York: Oxford University Press.
Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.CrossRef
De Jong, H. L. (2002). Levels of explanation in biological psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 15, 441–462.CrossRef
Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998). The Mind’s past. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gottesman, I. I., & Shields, J. (1972). Schizophrenia and genetics: A twin study vantage point. New York: Academic.
Heller, W. (1993). Neuropsychological mechanisms of individual differences in emotion, personality, and arousal. Neuropsychology, 7, 476–489.CrossRef
Iacono, W. G. (1983). Psychophysiology and genetics: A key to psychopathology research. Psychophysiology, 20, 371–383.PubMedCrossRef
Ilardi, S. S., & Feldman, D. (2001). The cognitive neuroscience paradigm: A unifying meta-theoretical framework for the science and practice of clinical psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 1067–1088.PubMedCrossRef
Ilardi, S. S., Rand, K., & Karwoski, L. (2007). The cognitive neuroscience perspective allows us to understand abnormal behavior at multiple levels of complexity. In S. O. Lilienfeld & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), The great ideas of clinical science: 17 principles that every mental health professional should understand (pp. 291–309). New York: Routledge.
Kendler, K. S. (2005). Toward a philosophical structure for psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 433–440.PubMedCrossRef
Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and Its problems. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lewinsohn, P. M. (1974). Clinical and theoretical aspects of depression. In K. S. Calhoun, H. E. Adams, & K. M. Mitchell (Eds.), Innovative treatment methods in psychopathology (pp. 63–120). New York: Wiley.
Lilienfeld, S. O., Waldman, I. D., & Israel, A. C. (1994). A critical examination of the term and concept of ‘comorbidity’ in psychopathology research. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1, 71–83.CrossRef
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Waller, N. G. (2005). A great pioneer of clinical science remembered: Introduction to the Special Issue in honor of Paul E. Meehl. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 1201–1207.PubMedCrossRef
Maser, J. D., & Cloninger, C. R. (1990) (Eds.) Comorbidity of mood and anxiety disorders. Washington, DC: The American Psychiatric Press.
Miller, G. A. (1996). How we think about cognition, emotion, and biology in psychopathology. Psychophysiology, 33, 615–628.PubMedCrossRef
Mitchell, S. D., Datson, L., Gigerenzer, G., Sesardic, N., & Sloep, P. (1997). The why’s and how’s of interdisciplinarity. In S. Maasen, S. D. Mitchell., P. J. Richerson, & P. Weingart (Eds.), Human by nature: Between biology and the social sciences (pp. 103–150). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
Robinson, D. N. (1995). The logic of reductionist models. New Ideas in Psychology, 13, 1–8.CrossRef
Schaffner, K. F. (1994). Psychiatry and molecular biology: Reductionistic approaches to schizophrenia. In J. Z. Sadler, O. P. Wiggins, & M. Schwartz (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives on psychiatric diagnostic classification (pp. 279–294). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Staats, A. W. (1991). Unified positivism and unification psychology. American Psychologist, 46, 899–912.CrossRef
Sternberg, R. J. (2006, Spring). Is there still any hope of a unified Psychology?. The General Psychologist, 41(1), 15–16.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.CrossRefPubMed
Wachtel, P. L. (1980). Investigation and its discontents: Some constraints on progress in psychological research. American Psychologist, 35, 399–408.CrossRef
Walsh, A. (1997). Methodological individualism and vertical integration in the social sciences. Behavior and Philosophy, 25, 121–136.
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience unpleasant emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 465–490.CrossRef
Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. New York: The MacMillan Company.
Metagegevens
Titel
Cognitive Neuroscience and Depression: Legitimate Versus Illegitimate Reductionism and Five Challenges
Auteur
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Publicatiedatum
01-04-2007
Gepubliceerd in
Cognitive Therapy and Research / Uitgave 2/2007
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-007-9127-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2007

Increased Parietal and Frontal Activation after Remission from Recurrent Major Depression: A Repeated fMRI Study

  • Original Article

Neurobehavioral Therapies in the 21st Century: Summary of an Emerging Field and an Extended Example of Cognitive Control Training for Depression

  • Original Article

The Promise of Cognitive Neuroscience for Advancing Depression Research

  • Introduction

Risk Aversion Among Depressed Older Adults with Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder

  • Original Article

Cognitive Deficits in Depression and Functional Specificity of Regional Brain Activity

  • Original Paper

Neurophysiology of Motivated Learning: Adaptive Mechanisms Underlying Cognitive Bias in Depression

  • Original Article