Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Ga naar:
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
BSL Shop
Inloggen

Welkom bij Erasmus MC & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Erasmus MC heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

» Andere revante producten voor Erasmus MC studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van Erasmus MC, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van Erasmus MC.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Psychological Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-05-2008 | Original Article

Attentional demand and memory retrieval in negative priming

Auteurs: Hsuan-Fu Chao, Yei-Yu Yeh

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2008

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Negative priming refers to delayed response to previous distractors, and can reflect the operation of attentional selection in prime trials. One important feature of negative priming is that it is modulated by the characteristics of probe trials. The current study manipulated competition from probe distractors and prime–probe similarity to examine the effects of attentional demand and memory retrieval in probe trials. The results demonstrated that the effects of attentional demand and memory retrieval on negative priming were dynamic. Distractor competition in probe trials affected negative priming in Experiment 1, and prime–probe similarity affected negative priming in Experiment 2. Moreover, negative priming in Experiment 3 was observed either when competition from probe distractors was strong or when identical spatial layouts were used in prime–probe couplets. Taken together, either competition from probe distractors or prime–probe similarity of spatial layouts was critical to the manifestation of negative priming at one time. Implications for distractor inhibition and memory retrieval in negative priming were discussed.
vorige artikel Prime-trial processing demands and their impact on distractor processing in a spatial negative priming task
volgende artikel Endogenous orienting modulates the Simon effect: critical factors in experimental design
Voetnoten
1
We thank Raymond Klein for noting this absence of effect in the control condition.
 
2
We thank Steven Tipper for suggesting this way of analysis.
 
3
To examine whether different layout configuration interacted with negative priming, we further conducted a four-way repeated measures ANOVA that included layout type as a factor. Although responding to a target in a linear layout was significantly slower than that in the non-linear layout [F(1, 23) = 5.25, MSE = 488.27, P < 0.05], this effect did not interact with other variables. Thus, only the effect of competition and prime–probe similarity were discussed.
 
Literatuur
Chao, H.-F., & Yeh, Y.-Y. (2004). Distractors of low activation can produce negative priming. Memory & Cognition, 32, 979–989.
Chao, H.-F., & Yeh, Y.-Y. (2005). Location negative priming in identity discrimination relies on location repetition. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 789–801.
Chiappe, D. L., & MacLeod, C. M. (1995). Negative priming is not task bound: A consistent pattern across naming and categorization tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 364–369.
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71.PubMedCrossRef
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360–365.CrossRef
Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., & Budayr, D. (1966). Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 23, 1211–1214.
DeSchepper, B., & Treisman A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 27–47.PubMedCrossRef
Driver, J., & Tipper, S. P. (1989). On the nonselectivity of “selective” seeing: Contrasts between interference and priming in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 304–314.CrossRef
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.PubMedCrossRef
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 155–160.
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.
Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 145–173.
Fox, E., & de Fockert, J. W. (1998). Negative priming depends on prime–probe similarity: Evidence for episodic retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 107–113.
Frings, C., & Wentura, D. (2006). Strategy effects counteract distractor inhibition: Negative priming with constantly absent probe distractors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 854–864.PubMedCrossRef
Goldstone, R. L., Medin, D. L., & Halberstadt, J. (1997). Similarity in context. Memory & Cognition, 25, 237–255.
Grison, S., Kessler, K., Paul, M. A., Jordan, H., & Tipper, S. P. (2004). Object- and location-based inhibition in goal-directed action: Inhibition of return reveals behavioural, anatomical dissociations and interactions with memory processes. In: G. W. Humphreys, & J. Riddoch (Eds.), Attention in action. Hove: Psychology Press.
Grison, S., Tipper, S. P., & Hewitt, O. (2005). Long-term negative priming: Support for retrieval of prior attentional processes. Quarterly Journal of Experiment Psychology, 58A, 1199–1224.
Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In: D. Dagenbach, & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53–112). San Diego: Academic.
Houghton, G., Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Shore, D. I. (1996). Inhibition and interference in selective attention: Some tests of a neural network model. Visual Cognition, 3, 119–164.CrossRef
Kane, M. J., May, C. P., Hasher, L., Rahhal, T., & Stoltzfus, E. R. (1997). Dual mechanisms of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 632–650.PubMedCrossRef
Kramer, A. F., & Strayer, D. L. (2001). Influence of stimulus repetition on negative priming. Psychology & Aging, 16, 580–587.CrossRef
Lavie, N., & Fox, E. (2000). The role of perceptual load in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1038–1052.PubMedCrossRef
Lowe, D. G. (1979). Strategies, context and the mechanisms of response inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 382–389.
MacDonald, P. A., & Joordens, S. (2000). Investigating a memory-based account of negative priming: Support for selection-feature mismatch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1478–1496.PubMedCrossRef
MacDonald, P. A., Joordens, S., & Seergobin, K. N. (1999). Negative priming effects that are bigger than a breadbox: Attending to distractors does not eliminate negative priming but rather enhance it. Memory & Cognition, 27, 197–207.
Malley, G. B., & Strayer, D. L. (1995). Effect of stimulus repetition on positive and negative identity priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 657–667.
May, C. P., Kane, M. J., & Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35–54.PubMedCrossRef
Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2006). Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 932–943.PubMedCrossRef
Milliken, B., Joordens, S., Merikle, P. M., & Seiffert, A. E. (1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203–229.PubMedCrossRef
Moore, C. M. (1994). Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone? Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 133–147.
Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 444–450.CrossRef
Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1291–1305.CrossRef
Neill, W. T., & Mathis, K. M. (1998). Transfer-inappropriate processing: Negative priming and related phenomena. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 38, pp. 1–44). San Diego: Academic.
Neill, W. T., Terry, K. M., & Valdes, L. A. (1994). Negative priming without probe selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 119–121.
Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 565–576.CrossRef
Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1996). Facilitatory and inhibitory aspects of attention. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 77–106). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., & Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. N. Dempster, & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207–261). New York: Academic.
Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 993–1000.PubMedCrossRef
Paquet, L. (2001). Eliminating flanker effects and negative priming in the flankers task: Evidence for early selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 301–306.
Strayer, D. L., & Grison, S. (1999). Negative identity priming is contingent on stimulus repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 24–38.PubMedCrossRef
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.CrossRef
The Ministry of Education Committee for the Promotion and Propagation of the National Language. (1997). The frequency statistics of the words and phrases in the compiled materials of the Concise Mandarin Dictionary. Taipei, Taiwan: The Ministry of Education.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571–590.
Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321–343.CrossRef
Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 492–504.PubMedCrossRef
Tipper, S. P., & Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 591–611.
Tipper, S. P., & Driver, J. (1988). Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task: Evidence for semantic processing of ignored stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 16, 64–70.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Houghton, G. (1994). Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 809–840.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.PubMedCrossRef
Wong, K. F. E. (2000). Dissociative prime–probe contextual similarity effects on negative priming and repetition priming: A challenge to episodic retrieval as a unified account of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1411–1422.PubMedCrossRef
Yang, T.-Y., Yeh, Y.-Y., & Chao, H.-F. (2004). The effect of contextual similarity on negative priming. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 46, 15–27.
Yee, P. L. (1991). Semantic inhibition of ignored words during a figure classification task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 127–153.
Yeh, Y.-Y., & Chao, H.-F. (2004). Probe distractors can influence negative priming by perceptual grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 208–218.
Metagegevens
Titel
Attentional demand and memory retrieval in negative priming
Auteurs
Hsuan-Fu Chao
Yei-Yu Yeh
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2008
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0106-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2008

Solving the credit assignment problem: explicit and implicit learning of action sequences with probabilistic outcomes

  • Original Article

Offline and online automatic number comparison

  • Erratum

ERP predictors of individual performance on a prospective temporal reproduction task

  • Original Article

Prime-trial processing demands and their impact on distractor processing in a spatial negative priming task

  • Original Article

Affective stimulus properties influence size perception and the Ebbinghaus illusion

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

Offline and online automatic number comparison

  • Original Article